Cargando…

Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis

BACKGROUND: School closure was employed as a non-pharmaceutical intervention against pandemic 2009 H1N1, particularly during the first wave. More than 700 schools in the United States were closed. However, closure decisions reflected significant variation in rationales, decision triggers, and author...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klaiman, Tamar, Kraemer, John D, Stoto, Michael A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21284865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-73
_version_ 1782198202537082880
author Klaiman, Tamar
Kraemer, John D
Stoto, Michael A
author_facet Klaiman, Tamar
Kraemer, John D
Stoto, Michael A
author_sort Klaiman, Tamar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: School closure was employed as a non-pharmaceutical intervention against pandemic 2009 H1N1, particularly during the first wave. More than 700 schools in the United States were closed. However, closure decisions reflected significant variation in rationales, decision triggers, and authority for closure. This variability presents the opportunity for improved efficiency and decision-making. METHODS: We identified media reports relating to school closure as a response to 2009 H1N1 by monitoring high-profile sources and searching Lexis-Nexis and Google news alerts, and reviewed reports for key themes. News stories were supplemented by observing conference calls and meetings with health department and school officials, and by discussions with decision-makers and community members. RESULTS: There was significant variation in the stated goal of closure decision, including limiting community spread of the virus, protecting particularly vulnerable students, and responding to staff shortages or student absenteeism. Because the goal of closure is relevant to its timing, nature, and duration, unclear rationales for closure can challenge its effectiveness. There was also significant variation in the decision-making authority to close schools in different jurisdictions, which, in some instances, was reflected in open disagreement between school and public health officials. Finally, decision-makers did not appear to expect the level of scientific uncertainty encountered early in the pandemic, and they often expressed significant frustration over changing CDC guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The use of school closure as a public health response to epidemic disease can be improved by ensuring that officials clarify the goals of closure and tailor closure decisions to those goals. Additionally, authority to close schools should be clarified in advance, and decision-makers should expect to encounter uncertainty disease emergencies unfold and plan accordingly.
format Text
id pubmed-3039590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30395902011-02-16 Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis Klaiman, Tamar Kraemer, John D Stoto, Michael A BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: School closure was employed as a non-pharmaceutical intervention against pandemic 2009 H1N1, particularly during the first wave. More than 700 schools in the United States were closed. However, closure decisions reflected significant variation in rationales, decision triggers, and authority for closure. This variability presents the opportunity for improved efficiency and decision-making. METHODS: We identified media reports relating to school closure as a response to 2009 H1N1 by monitoring high-profile sources and searching Lexis-Nexis and Google news alerts, and reviewed reports for key themes. News stories were supplemented by observing conference calls and meetings with health department and school officials, and by discussions with decision-makers and community members. RESULTS: There was significant variation in the stated goal of closure decision, including limiting community spread of the virus, protecting particularly vulnerable students, and responding to staff shortages or student absenteeism. Because the goal of closure is relevant to its timing, nature, and duration, unclear rationales for closure can challenge its effectiveness. There was also significant variation in the decision-making authority to close schools in different jurisdictions, which, in some instances, was reflected in open disagreement between school and public health officials. Finally, decision-makers did not appear to expect the level of scientific uncertainty encountered early in the pandemic, and they often expressed significant frustration over changing CDC guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The use of school closure as a public health response to epidemic disease can be improved by ensuring that officials clarify the goals of closure and tailor closure decisions to those goals. Additionally, authority to close schools should be clarified in advance, and decision-makers should expect to encounter uncertainty disease emergencies unfold and plan accordingly. BioMed Central 2011-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3039590/ /pubmed/21284865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-73 Text en Copyright ©2011 Klaiman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Klaiman, Tamar
Kraemer, John D
Stoto, Michael A
Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
title Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
title_full Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
title_fullStr Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
title_full_unstemmed Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
title_short Variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 H1N1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
title_sort variability in school closure decisions in response to 2009 h1n1: a qualitative systems improvement analysis
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3039590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21284865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-73
work_keys_str_mv AT klaimantamar variabilityinschoolclosuredecisionsinresponseto2009h1n1aqualitativesystemsimprovementanalysis
AT kraemerjohnd variabilityinschoolclosuredecisionsinresponseto2009h1n1aqualitativesystemsimprovementanalysis
AT stotomichaela variabilityinschoolclosuredecisionsinresponseto2009h1n1aqualitativesystemsimprovementanalysis