Cargando…
Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
Wolbachia is a maternally inherited bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its host. Recent studies have shown that male-killing strains can induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) when introgressed into a resistant host. Phylogenetic studies suggest that transitions between CI and other Wol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0756-x |
_version_ | 1782198304560381952 |
---|---|
author | Kraaijeveld, Ken Reumer, Barbara M Mouton, Laurence Kremer, Natacha Vavre, Fabrice van Alphen, Jacques J M |
author_facet | Kraaijeveld, Ken Reumer, Barbara M Mouton, Laurence Kremer, Natacha Vavre, Fabrice van Alphen, Jacques J M |
author_sort | Kraaijeveld, Ken |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wolbachia is a maternally inherited bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its host. Recent studies have shown that male-killing strains can induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) when introgressed into a resistant host. Phylogenetic studies suggest that transitions between CI and other Wolbachia phenotypes have also occurred frequently, raising the possibility that latent CI may be widespread among Wolbachia. Here, we investigate whether a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia strain can also induce CI. Parthenogenetic females of the parasitoid wasp Asobara japonica regularly produce a small number of males that may be either infected or not. Uninfected males were further obtained through removal of the Wolbachia using antibiotics and from a naturally uninfected strain. Uninfected females that had mated with infected males produced a slightly, but significantly more male-biased sex ratio than uninfected females that had mated with uninfected males. This effect was strongest in females that mated with males that had a relatively high Wolbachia titer. Quantitative PCR indicated that infected males did not show higher ratios of nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA content. Wolbachia therefore does not cause diploidization of cells in infected males. While these results are consistent with CI, other alternatives such as production of abnormal sperm by infected males cannot be completely ruled out. Overall, the effect was very small (9%), suggesting that if CI is involved it may have degenerated through the accumulation of mutations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3040317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30403172011-03-29 Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? Kraaijeveld, Ken Reumer, Barbara M Mouton, Laurence Kremer, Natacha Vavre, Fabrice van Alphen, Jacques J M Naturwissenschaften Original Paper Wolbachia is a maternally inherited bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its host. Recent studies have shown that male-killing strains can induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) when introgressed into a resistant host. Phylogenetic studies suggest that transitions between CI and other Wolbachia phenotypes have also occurred frequently, raising the possibility that latent CI may be widespread among Wolbachia. Here, we investigate whether a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia strain can also induce CI. Parthenogenetic females of the parasitoid wasp Asobara japonica regularly produce a small number of males that may be either infected or not. Uninfected males were further obtained through removal of the Wolbachia using antibiotics and from a naturally uninfected strain. Uninfected females that had mated with infected males produced a slightly, but significantly more male-biased sex ratio than uninfected females that had mated with uninfected males. This effect was strongest in females that mated with males that had a relatively high Wolbachia titer. Quantitative PCR indicated that infected males did not show higher ratios of nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA content. Wolbachia therefore does not cause diploidization of cells in infected males. While these results are consistent with CI, other alternatives such as production of abnormal sperm by infected males cannot be completely ruled out. Overall, the effect was very small (9%), suggesting that if CI is involved it may have degenerated through the accumulation of mutations. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-08 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3040317/ /pubmed/21221516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0756-x Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kraaijeveld, Ken Reumer, Barbara M Mouton, Laurence Kremer, Natacha Vavre, Fabrice van Alphen, Jacques J M Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
title | Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
title_full | Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
title_fullStr | Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
title_short | Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
title_sort | does a parthenogenesis-inducing wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0756-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kraaijeveldken doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility AT reumerbarbaram doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility AT moutonlaurence doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility AT kremernatacha doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility AT vavrefabrice doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility AT vanalphenjacquesjm doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility |