Cargando…

Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?

Wolbachia is a maternally inherited bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its host. Recent studies have shown that male-killing strains can induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) when introgressed into a resistant host. Phylogenetic studies suggest that transitions between CI and other Wol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraaijeveld, Ken, Reumer, Barbara M, Mouton, Laurence, Kremer, Natacha, Vavre, Fabrice, van Alphen, Jacques J M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0756-x
_version_ 1782198304560381952
author Kraaijeveld, Ken
Reumer, Barbara M
Mouton, Laurence
Kremer, Natacha
Vavre, Fabrice
van Alphen, Jacques J M
author_facet Kraaijeveld, Ken
Reumer, Barbara M
Mouton, Laurence
Kremer, Natacha
Vavre, Fabrice
van Alphen, Jacques J M
author_sort Kraaijeveld, Ken
collection PubMed
description Wolbachia is a maternally inherited bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its host. Recent studies have shown that male-killing strains can induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) when introgressed into a resistant host. Phylogenetic studies suggest that transitions between CI and other Wolbachia phenotypes have also occurred frequently, raising the possibility that latent CI may be widespread among Wolbachia. Here, we investigate whether a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia strain can also induce CI. Parthenogenetic females of the parasitoid wasp Asobara japonica regularly produce a small number of males that may be either infected or not. Uninfected males were further obtained through removal of the Wolbachia using antibiotics and from a naturally uninfected strain. Uninfected females that had mated with infected males produced a slightly, but significantly more male-biased sex ratio than uninfected females that had mated with uninfected males. This effect was strongest in females that mated with males that had a relatively high Wolbachia titer. Quantitative PCR indicated that infected males did not show higher ratios of nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA content. Wolbachia therefore does not cause diploidization of cells in infected males. While these results are consistent with CI, other alternatives such as production of abnormal sperm by infected males cannot be completely ruled out. Overall, the effect was very small (9%), suggesting that if CI is involved it may have degenerated through the accumulation of mutations.
format Text
id pubmed-3040317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30403172011-03-29 Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility? Kraaijeveld, Ken Reumer, Barbara M Mouton, Laurence Kremer, Natacha Vavre, Fabrice van Alphen, Jacques J M Naturwissenschaften Original Paper Wolbachia is a maternally inherited bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its host. Recent studies have shown that male-killing strains can induce cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) when introgressed into a resistant host. Phylogenetic studies suggest that transitions between CI and other Wolbachia phenotypes have also occurred frequently, raising the possibility that latent CI may be widespread among Wolbachia. Here, we investigate whether a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia strain can also induce CI. Parthenogenetic females of the parasitoid wasp Asobara japonica regularly produce a small number of males that may be either infected or not. Uninfected males were further obtained through removal of the Wolbachia using antibiotics and from a naturally uninfected strain. Uninfected females that had mated with infected males produced a slightly, but significantly more male-biased sex ratio than uninfected females that had mated with uninfected males. This effect was strongest in females that mated with males that had a relatively high Wolbachia titer. Quantitative PCR indicated that infected males did not show higher ratios of nuclear versus mitochondrial DNA content. Wolbachia therefore does not cause diploidization of cells in infected males. While these results are consistent with CI, other alternatives such as production of abnormal sperm by infected males cannot be completely ruled out. Overall, the effect was very small (9%), suggesting that if CI is involved it may have degenerated through the accumulation of mutations. Springer-Verlag 2011-01-08 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3040317/ /pubmed/21221516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0756-x Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kraaijeveld, Ken
Reumer, Barbara M
Mouton, Laurence
Kremer, Natacha
Vavre, Fabrice
van Alphen, Jacques J M
Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
title Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
title_full Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
title_fullStr Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
title_full_unstemmed Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
title_short Does a parthenogenesis-inducing Wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
title_sort does a parthenogenesis-inducing wolbachia induce vestigial cytoplasmic incompatibility?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21221516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0756-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kraaijeveldken doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility
AT reumerbarbaram doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility
AT moutonlaurence doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility
AT kremernatacha doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility
AT vavrefabrice doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility
AT vanalphenjacquesjm doesaparthenogenesisinducingwolbachiainducevestigialcytoplasmicincompatibility