Cargando…
Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
Protein N-glycosylation requires the presence of asparagine (N) in the consensus tri-peptide NXS/T (where X is any amino acid, S is serine and T is threonine). Several factors affect the glycosylation potential of NXS/T sequons and one such factor is the type of amino acid at position X. While proli...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Biomedical Informatics
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21364799 |
_version_ | 1782198325845426176 |
---|---|
author | Rao, R Shyama Prasad Bernd, Wollenweber |
author_facet | Rao, R Shyama Prasad Bernd, Wollenweber |
author_sort | Rao, R Shyama Prasad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein N-glycosylation requires the presence of asparagine (N) in the consensus tri-peptide NXS/T (where X is any amino acid, S is serine and T is threonine). Several factors affect the glycosylation potential of NXS/T sequons and one such factor is the type of amino acid at position X. While proline was shown to negatively affect N-glycosylation, the nature of other amino acids at this position is not clear. Using Markov chain analysis of tri-peptide NXS/T from viral, archaeal and eukaryotic proteins as well as experimentally confirmed N-glycosylated sequons from eukaryotic proteins, we show here that the occurrence of most sequon types differ significantly from the expected probability. Sequon types with F, G, I, S, T and V amino acids are consistently preferred while those with P and charged amino acids are under-represented in all four groups. Further, proteins contained far fewer number of possible sequon types (maximum 20 types for NXS or NXT taken separately) for any given number of sequons, which may be explained based on random sampling. Consistent with the present finding, majority of the over-represented sequons found in two important viral envelope glycoproteins (hemagglutinin of influenza A H3N2 and glycoprotein120 of HIV-1) are indeed preferred sequon types, which may provide a selective advantage. Accordingly, although there seems to be some preference for sequons, this preference may not be unique to N-glycosylation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3040501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Biomedical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30405012011-03-01 Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? Rao, R Shyama Prasad Bernd, Wollenweber Bioinformation Hypothesis Protein N-glycosylation requires the presence of asparagine (N) in the consensus tri-peptide NXS/T (where X is any amino acid, S is serine and T is threonine). Several factors affect the glycosylation potential of NXS/T sequons and one such factor is the type of amino acid at position X. While proline was shown to negatively affect N-glycosylation, the nature of other amino acids at this position is not clear. Using Markov chain analysis of tri-peptide NXS/T from viral, archaeal and eukaryotic proteins as well as experimentally confirmed N-glycosylated sequons from eukaryotic proteins, we show here that the occurrence of most sequon types differ significantly from the expected probability. Sequon types with F, G, I, S, T and V amino acids are consistently preferred while those with P and charged amino acids are under-represented in all four groups. Further, proteins contained far fewer number of possible sequon types (maximum 20 types for NXS or NXT taken separately) for any given number of sequons, which may be explained based on random sampling. Consistent with the present finding, majority of the over-represented sequons found in two important viral envelope glycoproteins (hemagglutinin of influenza A H3N2 and glycoprotein120 of HIV-1) are indeed preferred sequon types, which may provide a selective advantage. Accordingly, although there seems to be some preference for sequons, this preference may not be unique to N-glycosylation. Biomedical Informatics 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3040501/ /pubmed/21364799 Text en © 2010 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Hypothesis Rao, R Shyama Prasad Bernd, Wollenweber Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
title | Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
title_full | Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
title_fullStr | Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
title_short | Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
title_sort | do n-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? |
topic | Hypothesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21364799 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raorshyamaprasad donglycoproteinshavepreferenceforspecificsequons AT berndwollenweber donglycoproteinshavepreferenceforspecificsequons |