Cargando…

Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?

Protein N-glycosylation requires the presence of asparagine (N) in the consensus tri-peptide NXS/T (where X is any amino acid, S is serine and T is threonine). Several factors affect the glycosylation potential of NXS/T sequons and one such factor is the type of amino acid at position X. While proli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, R Shyama Prasad, Bernd, Wollenweber
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21364799
_version_ 1782198325845426176
author Rao, R Shyama Prasad
Bernd, Wollenweber
author_facet Rao, R Shyama Prasad
Bernd, Wollenweber
author_sort Rao, R Shyama Prasad
collection PubMed
description Protein N-glycosylation requires the presence of asparagine (N) in the consensus tri-peptide NXS/T (where X is any amino acid, S is serine and T is threonine). Several factors affect the glycosylation potential of NXS/T sequons and one such factor is the type of amino acid at position X. While proline was shown to negatively affect N-glycosylation, the nature of other amino acids at this position is not clear. Using Markov chain analysis of tri-peptide NXS/T from viral, archaeal and eukaryotic proteins as well as experimentally confirmed N-glycosylated sequons from eukaryotic proteins, we show here that the occurrence of most sequon types differ significantly from the expected probability. Sequon types with F, G, I, S, T and V amino acids are consistently preferred while those with P and charged amino acids are under-represented in all four groups. Further, proteins contained far fewer number of possible sequon types (maximum 20 types for NXS or NXT taken separately) for any given number of sequons, which may be explained based on random sampling. Consistent with the present finding, majority of the over-represented sequons found in two important viral envelope glycoproteins (hemagglutinin of influenza A H3N2 and glycoprotein120 of HIV-1) are indeed preferred sequon types, which may provide a selective advantage. Accordingly, although there seems to be some preference for sequons, this preference may not be unique to N-glycosylation.
format Text
id pubmed-3040501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30405012011-03-01 Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons? Rao, R Shyama Prasad Bernd, Wollenweber Bioinformation Hypothesis Protein N-glycosylation requires the presence of asparagine (N) in the consensus tri-peptide NXS/T (where X is any amino acid, S is serine and T is threonine). Several factors affect the glycosylation potential of NXS/T sequons and one such factor is the type of amino acid at position X. While proline was shown to negatively affect N-glycosylation, the nature of other amino acids at this position is not clear. Using Markov chain analysis of tri-peptide NXS/T from viral, archaeal and eukaryotic proteins as well as experimentally confirmed N-glycosylated sequons from eukaryotic proteins, we show here that the occurrence of most sequon types differ significantly from the expected probability. Sequon types with F, G, I, S, T and V amino acids are consistently preferred while those with P and charged amino acids are under-represented in all four groups. Further, proteins contained far fewer number of possible sequon types (maximum 20 types for NXS or NXT taken separately) for any given number of sequons, which may be explained based on random sampling. Consistent with the present finding, majority of the over-represented sequons found in two important viral envelope glycoproteins (hemagglutinin of influenza A H3N2 and glycoprotein120 of HIV-1) are indeed preferred sequon types, which may provide a selective advantage. Accordingly, although there seems to be some preference for sequons, this preference may not be unique to N-glycosylation. Biomedical Informatics 2010-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3040501/ /pubmed/21364799 Text en © 2010 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Rao, R Shyama Prasad
Bernd, Wollenweber
Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
title Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
title_full Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
title_fullStr Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
title_full_unstemmed Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
title_short Do N-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
title_sort do n-glycoproteins have preference for specific sequons?
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21364799
work_keys_str_mv AT raorshyamaprasad donglycoproteinshavepreferenceforspecificsequons
AT berndwollenweber donglycoproteinshavepreferenceforspecificsequons