Cargando…

Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network

Recognition of acoustic signals may be impeded by two factors: extrinsic noise, which degrades sounds before they arrive at the receiver’s ears, and intrinsic neuronal noise, which reveals itself in the trial-to-trial variability of the responses to identical sounds. Here we analyzed how these two n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuhofer, Daniela, Stemmler, Martin, Ronacher, Bernhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0606-5
_version_ 1782198381379059712
author Neuhofer, Daniela
Stemmler, Martin
Ronacher, Bernhard
author_facet Neuhofer, Daniela
Stemmler, Martin
Ronacher, Bernhard
author_sort Neuhofer, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Recognition of acoustic signals may be impeded by two factors: extrinsic noise, which degrades sounds before they arrive at the receiver’s ears, and intrinsic neuronal noise, which reveals itself in the trial-to-trial variability of the responses to identical sounds. Here we analyzed how these two noise sources affect the recognition of acoustic signals from potential mates in grasshoppers. By progressively corrupting the envelope of a female song, we determined the critical degradation level at which males failed to recognize a courtship call in behavioral experiments. Using the same stimuli, we recorded intracellularly from auditory neurons at three different processing levels, and quantified the corresponding changes in spike train patterns by a spike train metric, which assigns a distance between spike trains. Unexpectedly, for most neurons, intrinsic variability accounted for the main part of the metric distance between spike trains, even at the strongest degradation levels. At consecutive levels of processing, intrinsic variability increased, while the sensitivity to external noise decreased. We followed two approaches to determine critical degradation levels from spike train dissimilarities, and compared the results with the limits of signal recognition measured in behaving animals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0606-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Text
id pubmed-3040818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30408182011-03-29 Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network Neuhofer, Daniela Stemmler, Martin Ronacher, Bernhard J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Original Paper Recognition of acoustic signals may be impeded by two factors: extrinsic noise, which degrades sounds before they arrive at the receiver’s ears, and intrinsic neuronal noise, which reveals itself in the trial-to-trial variability of the responses to identical sounds. Here we analyzed how these two noise sources affect the recognition of acoustic signals from potential mates in grasshoppers. By progressively corrupting the envelope of a female song, we determined the critical degradation level at which males failed to recognize a courtship call in behavioral experiments. Using the same stimuli, we recorded intracellularly from auditory neurons at three different processing levels, and quantified the corresponding changes in spike train patterns by a spike train metric, which assigns a distance between spike trains. Unexpectedly, for most neurons, intrinsic variability accounted for the main part of the metric distance between spike trains, even at the strongest degradation levels. At consecutive levels of processing, intrinsic variability increased, while the sensitivity to external noise decreased. We followed two approaches to determine critical degradation levels from spike train dissimilarities, and compared the results with the limits of signal recognition measured in behaving animals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0606-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2010-11-10 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3040818/ /pubmed/21063712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0606-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Neuhofer, Daniela
Stemmler, Martin
Ronacher, Bernhard
Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
title Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
title_full Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
title_fullStr Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
title_full_unstemmed Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
title_short Neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
title_sort neuronal precision and the limits for acoustic signal recognition in a small neuronal network
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3040818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0606-5
work_keys_str_mv AT neuhoferdaniela neuronalprecisionandthelimitsforacousticsignalrecognitioninasmallneuronalnetwork
AT stemmlermartin neuronalprecisionandthelimitsforacousticsignalrecognitioninasmallneuronalnetwork
AT ronacherbernhard neuronalprecisionandthelimitsforacousticsignalrecognitioninasmallneuronalnetwork