Cargando…
Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery
BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most common procedure for weight loss surgery but has multiple complications. This study evaluates the use of reinforced circular staplers (RCS) and their effects on reducing gastrojejunal anastomotic complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333188 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466007089 |
_version_ | 1782198403138060288 |
---|---|
author | Ramirez, Marcela C. Rodriguez, Joaquin Varghese, Flora Atkinson, William H. Rhodes, Daniel Rajab, M. Hassan Symmonds, Richard |
author_facet | Ramirez, Marcela C. Rodriguez, Joaquin Varghese, Flora Atkinson, William H. Rhodes, Daniel Rajab, M. Hassan Symmonds, Richard |
author_sort | Ramirez, Marcela C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most common procedure for weight loss surgery but has multiple complications. This study evaluates the use of reinforced circular staplers (RCS) and their effects on reducing gastrojejunal anastomotic complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review from January 2007 to November 2008. Laparoscopic RYGBP were performed in 287 patients. A comparison was made of the complications with and without the use of reinforced circular staplers. The comparison was between a nonreinforced circular stapler (NRCS) group comprising 182 patients and an RCS group comprising 105 patients. RESULTS: Complications at gastrojejunal anastomosis were experienced by 15.3% of the patients; 9.5% were in the RCS group and 18.7% were in the NRCS group (P=0.026). Neither group had anastomotic leaks. Bleeding rate was 4.8% in the RCS group vs. 6.6% in the NRCS group. Ulcers occurred in 2.9% of the RCS group vs. 6.0% of the NRCS group. Stricture rate was 1.9% in the RCS group vs. 6.6% in the NRCS group. CONCLUSION: The application of RCS reduced the incidence of gastrojejunal anastomotic complications. Patients are twice as likely to develop complications when no RCS device is used (95% CI 1.03, 4.623). Therefore, it is beneficial to utilize RCS for the gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGBP procedures. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3041031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30410312011-02-18 Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery Ramirez, Marcela C. Rodriguez, Joaquin Varghese, Flora Atkinson, William H. Rhodes, Daniel Rajab, M. Hassan Symmonds, Richard JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is the most common procedure for weight loss surgery but has multiple complications. This study evaluates the use of reinforced circular staplers (RCS) and their effects on reducing gastrojejunal anastomotic complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review from January 2007 to November 2008. Laparoscopic RYGBP were performed in 287 patients. A comparison was made of the complications with and without the use of reinforced circular staplers. The comparison was between a nonreinforced circular stapler (NRCS) group comprising 182 patients and an RCS group comprising 105 patients. RESULTS: Complications at gastrojejunal anastomosis were experienced by 15.3% of the patients; 9.5% were in the RCS group and 18.7% were in the NRCS group (P=0.026). Neither group had anastomotic leaks. Bleeding rate was 4.8% in the RCS group vs. 6.6% in the NRCS group. Ulcers occurred in 2.9% of the RCS group vs. 6.0% of the NRCS group. Stricture rate was 1.9% in the RCS group vs. 6.6% in the NRCS group. CONCLUSION: The application of RCS reduced the incidence of gastrojejunal anastomotic complications. Patients are twice as likely to develop complications when no RCS device is used (95% CI 1.03, 4.623). Therefore, it is beneficial to utilize RCS for the gastrojejunal anastomosis in RYGBP procedures. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3041031/ /pubmed/21333188 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466007089 Text en © 2010 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Ramirez, Marcela C. Rodriguez, Joaquin Varghese, Flora Atkinson, William H. Rhodes, Daniel Rajab, M. Hassan Symmonds, Richard Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery |
title | Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery |
title_full | Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery |
title_fullStr | Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery |
title_short | Reinforced Circular Stapler in Bariatric Surgery |
title_sort | reinforced circular stapler in bariatric surgery |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333188 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466007089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramirezmarcelac reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery AT rodriguezjoaquin reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery AT vargheseflora reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery AT atkinsonwilliamh reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery AT rhodesdaniel reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery AT rajabmhassan reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery AT symmondsrichard reinforcedcircularstaplerinbariatricsurgery |