Cargando…

Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) migration and colon perforation is a rare but serious complication occurring sometimes years after insertion. Laparoscopic removal of a colon-perforating device is a seldom-used approach. CASE: A 35-year-old presented with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitterman, Arie, Lefel, Oleg, Segev, Yakir, Lavie, Ofer
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333210
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466006963
_version_ 1782198408411348992
author Bitterman, Arie
Lefel, Oleg
Segev, Yakir
Lavie, Ofer
author_facet Bitterman, Arie
Lefel, Oleg
Segev, Yakir
Lavie, Ofer
author_sort Bitterman, Arie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) migration and colon perforation is a rare but serious complication occurring sometimes years after insertion. Laparoscopic removal of a colon-perforating device is a seldom-used approach. CASE: A 35-year-old presented with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pain one year following intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Upon vaginal examination, no IUD string was detected. An abdominal X-ray depicted the IUD in a position below the hepatic flexure. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan suggested an IUD-like foreign object posterior and medial to the hepatic flexure. Colon perforation by an intrauterine device was diagnosed, the device was identified and removed, and the intestinal damage was repaired with a laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis and surgical removal of a perforating intrauterine device reduces the possible risks of abdominal complications this condition presents. In select cases, the laparoscopic approach for intrauterine device removal may be a simple and safe approach, thus minimizing possible postoperative complications.
format Text
id pubmed-3041053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30410532011-02-18 Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation Bitterman, Arie Lefel, Oleg Segev, Yakir Lavie, Ofer JSLS Case Reports BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) migration and colon perforation is a rare but serious complication occurring sometimes years after insertion. Laparoscopic removal of a colon-perforating device is a seldom-used approach. CASE: A 35-year-old presented with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pain one year following intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Upon vaginal examination, no IUD string was detected. An abdominal X-ray depicted the IUD in a position below the hepatic flexure. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan suggested an IUD-like foreign object posterior and medial to the hepatic flexure. Colon perforation by an intrauterine device was diagnosed, the device was identified and removed, and the intestinal damage was repaired with a laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis and surgical removal of a perforating intrauterine device reduces the possible risks of abdominal complications this condition presents. In select cases, the laparoscopic approach for intrauterine device removal may be a simple and safe approach, thus minimizing possible postoperative complications. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3041053/ /pubmed/21333210 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466006963 Text en © 2010 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Bitterman, Arie
Lefel, Oleg
Segev, Yakir
Lavie, Ofer
Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
title Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
title_full Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
title_short Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
title_sort laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device following colon perforation
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333210
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466006963
work_keys_str_mv AT bittermanarie laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation
AT lefeloleg laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation
AT segevyakir laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation
AT lavieofer laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation