Cargando…
Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation
BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) migration and colon perforation is a rare but serious complication occurring sometimes years after insertion. Laparoscopic removal of a colon-perforating device is a seldom-used approach. CASE: A 35-year-old presented with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333210 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466006963 |
_version_ | 1782198408411348992 |
---|---|
author | Bitterman, Arie Lefel, Oleg Segev, Yakir Lavie, Ofer |
author_facet | Bitterman, Arie Lefel, Oleg Segev, Yakir Lavie, Ofer |
author_sort | Bitterman, Arie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) migration and colon perforation is a rare but serious complication occurring sometimes years after insertion. Laparoscopic removal of a colon-perforating device is a seldom-used approach. CASE: A 35-year-old presented with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pain one year following intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Upon vaginal examination, no IUD string was detected. An abdominal X-ray depicted the IUD in a position below the hepatic flexure. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan suggested an IUD-like foreign object posterior and medial to the hepatic flexure. Colon perforation by an intrauterine device was diagnosed, the device was identified and removed, and the intestinal damage was repaired with a laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis and surgical removal of a perforating intrauterine device reduces the possible risks of abdominal complications this condition presents. In select cases, the laparoscopic approach for intrauterine device removal may be a simple and safe approach, thus minimizing possible postoperative complications. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3041053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30410532011-02-18 Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation Bitterman, Arie Lefel, Oleg Segev, Yakir Lavie, Ofer JSLS Case Reports BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) migration and colon perforation is a rare but serious complication occurring sometimes years after insertion. Laparoscopic removal of a colon-perforating device is a seldom-used approach. CASE: A 35-year-old presented with right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pain one year following intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. Upon vaginal examination, no IUD string was detected. An abdominal X-ray depicted the IUD in a position below the hepatic flexure. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan suggested an IUD-like foreign object posterior and medial to the hepatic flexure. Colon perforation by an intrauterine device was diagnosed, the device was identified and removed, and the intestinal damage was repaired with a laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis and surgical removal of a perforating intrauterine device reduces the possible risks of abdominal complications this condition presents. In select cases, the laparoscopic approach for intrauterine device removal may be a simple and safe approach, thus minimizing possible postoperative complications. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3041053/ /pubmed/21333210 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466006963 Text en © 2010 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Case Reports Bitterman, Arie Lefel, Oleg Segev, Yakir Lavie, Ofer Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation |
title | Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation |
title_full | Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation |
title_short | Laparoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device Following Colon Perforation |
title_sort | laparoscopic removal of an intrauterine device following colon perforation |
topic | Case Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333210 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12924466006963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bittermanarie laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation AT lefeloleg laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation AT segevyakir laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation AT lavieofer laparoscopicremovalofanintrauterinedevicefollowingcolonperforation |