Cargando…
Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-la...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21285388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1900 |
_version_ | 1782198414403960832 |
---|---|
author | Gallwitz, Baptist Böhmer, Michael Segiet, Thomas Mölle, Andrea Milek, Karsten Becker, Bernd Helsberg, Karin Petto, Helmut Peters, Natalie Bachmann, Oliver |
author_facet | Gallwitz, Baptist Böhmer, Michael Segiet, Thomas Mölle, Andrea Milek, Karsten Becker, Bernd Helsberg, Karin Petto, Helmut Peters, Natalie Bachmann, Oliver |
author_sort | Gallwitz, Baptist |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-label study, metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 26-week treatment with exenatide BID (4 weeks 5 μg, then 10 μg) or PIA. RESULTS: Exenatide BID (n = 181) was noninferior to PIA (n = 173) for A1C control (least squares [LS] mean change −1.0 vs. −1.14%; difference [95% CI] 0.14 [−0.003 to 0.291]) and associated with a lower risk for hypoglycemia (8.0 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.05). LS mean weight decreased by 4.1 kg and increased by 1.0 kg with PIA (P < 0.001). A total of 39.2 vs. 20.8% of patients reached the composite end point of A1C <7.0%, no weight gain, and no hypoglycemia (P < 0.001; post hoc analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3041190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30411902012-03-01 Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia Gallwitz, Baptist Böhmer, Michael Segiet, Thomas Mölle, Andrea Milek, Karsten Becker, Bernd Helsberg, Karin Petto, Helmut Peters, Natalie Bachmann, Oliver Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-label study, metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 26-week treatment with exenatide BID (4 weeks 5 μg, then 10 μg) or PIA. RESULTS: Exenatide BID (n = 181) was noninferior to PIA (n = 173) for A1C control (least squares [LS] mean change −1.0 vs. −1.14%; difference [95% CI] 0.14 [−0.003 to 0.291]) and associated with a lower risk for hypoglycemia (8.0 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.05). LS mean weight decreased by 4.1 kg and increased by 1.0 kg with PIA (P < 0.001). A total of 39.2 vs. 20.8% of patients reached the composite end point of A1C <7.0%, no weight gain, and no hypoglycemia (P < 0.001; post hoc analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control. American Diabetes Association 2011-03 2011-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3041190/ /pubmed/21285388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1900 Text en © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gallwitz, Baptist Böhmer, Michael Segiet, Thomas Mölle, Andrea Milek, Karsten Becker, Bernd Helsberg, Karin Petto, Helmut Peters, Natalie Bachmann, Oliver Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
title | Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
title_full | Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
title_fullStr | Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
title_short | Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
title_sort | exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21285388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1900 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gallwitzbaptist exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT bohmermichael exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT segietthomas exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT molleandrea exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT milekkarsten exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT beckerbernd exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT helsbergkarin exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT pettohelmut exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT petersnatalie exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia AT bachmannoliver exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia |