Cargando…

Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallwitz, Baptist, Böhmer, Michael, Segiet, Thomas, Mölle, Andrea, Milek, Karsten, Becker, Bernd, Helsberg, Karin, Petto, Helmut, Peters, Natalie, Bachmann, Oliver
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21285388
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1900
_version_ 1782198414403960832
author Gallwitz, Baptist
Böhmer, Michael
Segiet, Thomas
Mölle, Andrea
Milek, Karsten
Becker, Bernd
Helsberg, Karin
Petto, Helmut
Peters, Natalie
Bachmann, Oliver
author_facet Gallwitz, Baptist
Böhmer, Michael
Segiet, Thomas
Mölle, Andrea
Milek, Karsten
Becker, Bernd
Helsberg, Karin
Petto, Helmut
Peters, Natalie
Bachmann, Oliver
author_sort Gallwitz, Baptist
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-label study, metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 26-week treatment with exenatide BID (4 weeks 5 μg, then 10 μg) or PIA. RESULTS: Exenatide BID (n = 181) was noninferior to PIA (n = 173) for A1C control (least squares [LS] mean change −1.0 vs. −1.14%; difference [95% CI] 0.14 [−0.003 to 0.291]) and associated with a lower risk for hypoglycemia (8.0 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.05). LS mean weight decreased by 4.1 kg and increased by 1.0 kg with PIA (P < 0.001). A total of 39.2 vs. 20.8% of patients reached the composite end point of A1C <7.0%, no weight gain, and no hypoglycemia (P < 0.001; post hoc analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control.
format Text
id pubmed-3041190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30411902012-03-01 Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia Gallwitz, Baptist Böhmer, Michael Segiet, Thomas Mölle, Andrea Milek, Karsten Becker, Bernd Helsberg, Karin Petto, Helmut Peters, Natalie Bachmann, Oliver Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: Hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated if exenatide twice daily (BID) was noninferior to premixed insulin aspart 70/30 BID (PIA) for glycemic control and associated with less hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-label study, metformin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 26-week treatment with exenatide BID (4 weeks 5 μg, then 10 μg) or PIA. RESULTS: Exenatide BID (n = 181) was noninferior to PIA (n = 173) for A1C control (least squares [LS] mean change −1.0 vs. −1.14%; difference [95% CI] 0.14 [−0.003 to 0.291]) and associated with a lower risk for hypoglycemia (8.0 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.05). LS mean weight decreased by 4.1 kg and increased by 1.0 kg with PIA (P < 0.001). A total of 39.2 vs. 20.8% of patients reached the composite end point of A1C <7.0%, no weight gain, and no hypoglycemia (P < 0.001; post hoc analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control. American Diabetes Association 2011-03 2011-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3041190/ /pubmed/21285388 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1900 Text en © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gallwitz, Baptist
Böhmer, Michael
Segiet, Thomas
Mölle, Andrea
Milek, Karsten
Becker, Bernd
Helsberg, Karin
Petto, Helmut
Peters, Natalie
Bachmann, Oliver
Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
title Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
title_full Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
title_fullStr Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
title_full_unstemmed Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
title_short Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Premixed Insulin Aspart 70/30 in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
title_sort exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21285388
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1900
work_keys_str_mv AT gallwitzbaptist exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT bohmermichael exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT segietthomas exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT molleandrea exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT milekkarsten exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT beckerbernd exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT helsbergkarin exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT pettohelmut exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT petersnatalie exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia
AT bachmannoliver exenatidetwicedailyversuspremixedinsulinaspart7030inmetformintreatedpatientswithtype2diabetesarandomized26weekstudyonglycemiccontrolandhypoglycemia