Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and leading cause of disability in the United States. To maximize a stroke patient's chances of receiving thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke, it is important to improve prehospital recognition of stroke. However, it is known from publis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Govindarajan, Prasanthi, Ghilarducci, David, McCulloch, Charles, Pierog, Jessica, Bloom, Evan, Johnston, Claiborne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-14
_version_ 1782198539823087616
author Govindarajan, Prasanthi
Ghilarducci, David
McCulloch, Charles
Pierog, Jessica
Bloom, Evan
Johnston, Claiborne
author_facet Govindarajan, Prasanthi
Ghilarducci, David
McCulloch, Charles
Pierog, Jessica
Bloom, Evan
Johnston, Claiborne
author_sort Govindarajan, Prasanthi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and leading cause of disability in the United States. To maximize a stroke patient's chances of receiving thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke, it is important to improve prehospital recognition of stroke. However, it is known from published reports that emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) using Card 28 of the Medical Priority Dispatch System protocols recognize stroke poorly. Therefore, to improve EMD's recognition of stroke, the National Association of Emergency Medical Dispatchers recently designed a new diagnostic stroke tool (Cincinnati Stroke Scale -CSS) to be used with Card 28. The objective of this study is to determine whether the addition of CSS improves diagnostic accuracy of stroke triage. METHODS/DESIGN: This prospective experimental study will be conducted during a one-year period in the 911 call center of Santa Clara County, CA. We will include callers aged ≥ 18 years with a chief complaint suggestive of stroke and second party callers (by-stander or family who are in close proximity to the patient and can administer the tool) ≥ 18 years of age. Life threatening calls will be excluded from the study. Card 28 questions will be administered to subjects who meet study criteria. After completion of Card 28, CSS tool will be administered to all calls. EMDs will record their initial assessment of a cerebro-vascular accident (stroke) after completion of Card 28 and their final assessment after completion of CSS. These assessments will be compared with the hospital discharge diagnosis (ICD-9 codes) recorded in the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database after linking the EMD database and OSHPD database using probabilistic linkage. The primary analysis will compare the sensitivity of the two stroke protocols using logistic regression and generalizing estimating equations to account for clustering by EMDs. To detect a 15% difference in sensitivity between the two groups with 80% power, we will enroll a total of 370 subjects in this trial. DISCUSSION: A three week pilot study was performed which demonstrated the feasibility of implementation of the study protocol.
format Text
id pubmed-3042392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30423922011-02-22 Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol Govindarajan, Prasanthi Ghilarducci, David McCulloch, Charles Pierog, Jessica Bloom, Evan Johnston, Claiborne BMC Neurol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of death and leading cause of disability in the United States. To maximize a stroke patient's chances of receiving thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke, it is important to improve prehospital recognition of stroke. However, it is known from published reports that emergency medical dispatchers (EMDs) using Card 28 of the Medical Priority Dispatch System protocols recognize stroke poorly. Therefore, to improve EMD's recognition of stroke, the National Association of Emergency Medical Dispatchers recently designed a new diagnostic stroke tool (Cincinnati Stroke Scale -CSS) to be used with Card 28. The objective of this study is to determine whether the addition of CSS improves diagnostic accuracy of stroke triage. METHODS/DESIGN: This prospective experimental study will be conducted during a one-year period in the 911 call center of Santa Clara County, CA. We will include callers aged ≥ 18 years with a chief complaint suggestive of stroke and second party callers (by-stander or family who are in close proximity to the patient and can administer the tool) ≥ 18 years of age. Life threatening calls will be excluded from the study. Card 28 questions will be administered to subjects who meet study criteria. After completion of Card 28, CSS tool will be administered to all calls. EMDs will record their initial assessment of a cerebro-vascular accident (stroke) after completion of Card 28 and their final assessment after completion of CSS. These assessments will be compared with the hospital discharge diagnosis (ICD-9 codes) recorded in the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database after linking the EMD database and OSHPD database using probabilistic linkage. The primary analysis will compare the sensitivity of the two stroke protocols using logistic regression and generalizing estimating equations to account for clustering by EMDs. To detect a 15% difference in sensitivity between the two groups with 80% power, we will enroll a total of 370 subjects in this trial. DISCUSSION: A three week pilot study was performed which demonstrated the feasibility of implementation of the study protocol. BioMed Central 2011-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3042392/ /pubmed/21272365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-14 Text en Copyright ©2011 Govindarajan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Govindarajan, Prasanthi
Ghilarducci, David
McCulloch, Charles
Pierog, Jessica
Bloom, Evan
Johnston, Claiborne
Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol
title Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Stroke Triage Algorithms for Emergency Medical Dispatchers (MeDS): Prospective Cohort Study Protocol
title_sort comparative evaluation of stroke triage algorithms for emergency medical dispatchers (meds): prospective cohort study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-14
work_keys_str_mv AT govindarajanprasanthi comparativeevaluationofstroketriagealgorithmsforemergencymedicaldispatchersmedsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT ghilarduccidavid comparativeevaluationofstroketriagealgorithmsforemergencymedicaldispatchersmedsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT mccullochcharles comparativeevaluationofstroketriagealgorithmsforemergencymedicaldispatchersmedsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT pierogjessica comparativeevaluationofstroketriagealgorithmsforemergencymedicaldispatchersmedsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT bloomevan comparativeevaluationofstroketriagealgorithmsforemergencymedicaldispatchersmedsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol
AT johnstonclaiborne comparativeevaluationofstroketriagealgorithmsforemergencymedicaldispatchersmedsprospectivecohortstudyprotocol