Cargando…
Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
BACKGROUND: We developed a new version of the open source software package Peptrix that can yet compare large numbers of Orbitrap™ LC-MS data. The peptide profiling results for Peptrix on MS1 spectra were compared with those obtained from a small selection of open source and commercial software pack...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-21 |
_version_ | 1782198542215938048 |
---|---|
author | Titulaer, Mark K de Costa, Dominique Stingl, Christoph Dekker, Lennard J Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE Luider, Theo M |
author_facet | Titulaer, Mark K de Costa, Dominique Stingl, Christoph Dekker, Lennard J Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE Luider, Theo M |
author_sort | Titulaer, Mark K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We developed a new version of the open source software package Peptrix that can yet compare large numbers of Orbitrap™ LC-MS data. The peptide profiling results for Peptrix on MS1 spectra were compared with those obtained from a small selection of open source and commercial software packages: msInspect, Sieve™ and Progenesis™. The properties compared in these packages were speed, total number of detected masses, redundancy of masses, reproducibility in numbers and CV of intensity, overlap of masses, and differences in peptide peak intensities. Reproducibility measurements were taken for the different MS1 software applications by measuring in triplicate a complex peptide mixture of immunoglobulin on the Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer. Values of peptide masses detected from the high intensity peaks of the MS1 spectra by peptide profiling were verified with values of the MS2 fragmented and sequenced masses that resulted in protein identifications with a significant score. FINDINGS: Peptrix finds about the same number of peptide features as the other packages, but peptide masses are in some cases approximately 5 to 10 times less redundant present in the peptide profile matrix. The Peptrix profile matrix displays the largest overlap when comparing the number of masses in a pair between two software applications. The overlap of peptide masses between software packages of low intensity peaks in the spectra is remarkably low with about 50% of the detected masses in the individual packages. Peptrix does not differ from the other packages in detecting 96% of the masses that relate to highly abundant sequenced proteins. MS1 peak intensities vary between the applications in a non linear way as they are not processed using the same method. CONCLUSIONS: Peptrix is capable of peptide profiling using Orbitrap™ files and finding differential expressed peptides in body fluid and tissue samples. The number of peptide masses detected in Orbitrap™ files can be increased by using more MS1 peptide profiling applications, including Peptrix, since it appears from the comparison of Peptrix with the other applications that all software packages have likely a high false negative rate of low intensity peptide peaks (missing peptides). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3042405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30424052011-02-25 Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra Titulaer, Mark K de Costa, Dominique Stingl, Christoph Dekker, Lennard J Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE Luider, Theo M BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: We developed a new version of the open source software package Peptrix that can yet compare large numbers of Orbitrap™ LC-MS data. The peptide profiling results for Peptrix on MS1 spectra were compared with those obtained from a small selection of open source and commercial software packages: msInspect, Sieve™ and Progenesis™. The properties compared in these packages were speed, total number of detected masses, redundancy of masses, reproducibility in numbers and CV of intensity, overlap of masses, and differences in peptide peak intensities. Reproducibility measurements were taken for the different MS1 software applications by measuring in triplicate a complex peptide mixture of immunoglobulin on the Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer. Values of peptide masses detected from the high intensity peaks of the MS1 spectra by peptide profiling were verified with values of the MS2 fragmented and sequenced masses that resulted in protein identifications with a significant score. FINDINGS: Peptrix finds about the same number of peptide features as the other packages, but peptide masses are in some cases approximately 5 to 10 times less redundant present in the peptide profile matrix. The Peptrix profile matrix displays the largest overlap when comparing the number of masses in a pair between two software applications. The overlap of peptide masses between software packages of low intensity peaks in the spectra is remarkably low with about 50% of the detected masses in the individual packages. Peptrix does not differ from the other packages in detecting 96% of the masses that relate to highly abundant sequenced proteins. MS1 peak intensities vary between the applications in a non linear way as they are not processed using the same method. CONCLUSIONS: Peptrix is capable of peptide profiling using Orbitrap™ files and finding differential expressed peptides in body fluid and tissue samples. The number of peptide masses detected in Orbitrap™ files can be increased by using more MS1 peptide profiling applications, including Peptrix, since it appears from the comparison of Peptrix with the other applications that all software packages have likely a high false negative rate of low intensity peptide peaks (missing peptides). BioMed Central 2011-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3042405/ /pubmed/21272362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-21 Text en Copyright ©2011 Titulaer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Titulaer, Mark K de Costa, Dominique Stingl, Christoph Dekker, Lennard J Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE Luider, Theo M Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
title | Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
title_full | Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
title_fullStr | Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
title_full_unstemmed | Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
title_short | Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
title_sort | label-free peptide profiling of orbitrap™ full mass spectra |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT titulaermarkk labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra AT decostadominique labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra AT stinglchristoph labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra AT dekkerlennardj labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra AT sillevissmittpeterae labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra AT luidertheom labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra |