Cargando…

Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra

BACKGROUND: We developed a new version of the open source software package Peptrix that can yet compare large numbers of Orbitrap™ LC-MS data. The peptide profiling results for Peptrix on MS1 spectra were compared with those obtained from a small selection of open source and commercial software pack...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Titulaer, Mark K, de Costa, Dominique, Stingl, Christoph, Dekker, Lennard J, Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE, Luider, Theo M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-21
_version_ 1782198542215938048
author Titulaer, Mark K
de Costa, Dominique
Stingl, Christoph
Dekker, Lennard J
Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE
Luider, Theo M
author_facet Titulaer, Mark K
de Costa, Dominique
Stingl, Christoph
Dekker, Lennard J
Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE
Luider, Theo M
author_sort Titulaer, Mark K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We developed a new version of the open source software package Peptrix that can yet compare large numbers of Orbitrap™ LC-MS data. The peptide profiling results for Peptrix on MS1 spectra were compared with those obtained from a small selection of open source and commercial software packages: msInspect, Sieve™ and Progenesis™. The properties compared in these packages were speed, total number of detected masses, redundancy of masses, reproducibility in numbers and CV of intensity, overlap of masses, and differences in peptide peak intensities. Reproducibility measurements were taken for the different MS1 software applications by measuring in triplicate a complex peptide mixture of immunoglobulin on the Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer. Values of peptide masses detected from the high intensity peaks of the MS1 spectra by peptide profiling were verified with values of the MS2 fragmented and sequenced masses that resulted in protein identifications with a significant score. FINDINGS: Peptrix finds about the same number of peptide features as the other packages, but peptide masses are in some cases approximately 5 to 10 times less redundant present in the peptide profile matrix. The Peptrix profile matrix displays the largest overlap when comparing the number of masses in a pair between two software applications. The overlap of peptide masses between software packages of low intensity peaks in the spectra is remarkably low with about 50% of the detected masses in the individual packages. Peptrix does not differ from the other packages in detecting 96% of the masses that relate to highly abundant sequenced proteins. MS1 peak intensities vary between the applications in a non linear way as they are not processed using the same method. CONCLUSIONS: Peptrix is capable of peptide profiling using Orbitrap™ files and finding differential expressed peptides in body fluid and tissue samples. The number of peptide masses detected in Orbitrap™ files can be increased by using more MS1 peptide profiling applications, including Peptrix, since it appears from the comparison of Peptrix with the other applications that all software packages have likely a high false negative rate of low intensity peptide peaks (missing peptides).
format Text
id pubmed-3042405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30424052011-02-25 Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra Titulaer, Mark K de Costa, Dominique Stingl, Christoph Dekker, Lennard J Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE Luider, Theo M BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: We developed a new version of the open source software package Peptrix that can yet compare large numbers of Orbitrap™ LC-MS data. The peptide profiling results for Peptrix on MS1 spectra were compared with those obtained from a small selection of open source and commercial software packages: msInspect, Sieve™ and Progenesis™. The properties compared in these packages were speed, total number of detected masses, redundancy of masses, reproducibility in numbers and CV of intensity, overlap of masses, and differences in peptide peak intensities. Reproducibility measurements were taken for the different MS1 software applications by measuring in triplicate a complex peptide mixture of immunoglobulin on the Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer. Values of peptide masses detected from the high intensity peaks of the MS1 spectra by peptide profiling were verified with values of the MS2 fragmented and sequenced masses that resulted in protein identifications with a significant score. FINDINGS: Peptrix finds about the same number of peptide features as the other packages, but peptide masses are in some cases approximately 5 to 10 times less redundant present in the peptide profile matrix. The Peptrix profile matrix displays the largest overlap when comparing the number of masses in a pair between two software applications. The overlap of peptide masses between software packages of low intensity peaks in the spectra is remarkably low with about 50% of the detected masses in the individual packages. Peptrix does not differ from the other packages in detecting 96% of the masses that relate to highly abundant sequenced proteins. MS1 peak intensities vary between the applications in a non linear way as they are not processed using the same method. CONCLUSIONS: Peptrix is capable of peptide profiling using Orbitrap™ files and finding differential expressed peptides in body fluid and tissue samples. The number of peptide masses detected in Orbitrap™ files can be increased by using more MS1 peptide profiling applications, including Peptrix, since it appears from the comparison of Peptrix with the other applications that all software packages have likely a high false negative rate of low intensity peptide peaks (missing peptides). BioMed Central 2011-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3042405/ /pubmed/21272362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-21 Text en Copyright ©2011 Titulaer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Titulaer, Mark K
de Costa, Dominique
Stingl, Christoph
Dekker, Lennard J
Sillevis Smitt, Peter AE
Luider, Theo M
Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
title Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
title_full Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
title_fullStr Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
title_full_unstemmed Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
title_short Label-free peptide profiling of Orbitrap™ full mass spectra
title_sort label-free peptide profiling of orbitrap™ full mass spectra
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-21
work_keys_str_mv AT titulaermarkk labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra
AT decostadominique labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra
AT stinglchristoph labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra
AT dekkerlennardj labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra
AT sillevissmittpeterae labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra
AT luidertheom labelfreepeptideprofilingoforbitrapfullmassspectra