Cargando…
Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and determine the contribution of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of women with endometrial cancer and compare with the open technique. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was carried out on 120 women who underwent laparoscopic sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12113415 |
_version_ | 1782198645368553472 |
---|---|
author | Holub, Zdenek Jabor, Antonín Bartos, Pavel Eim, Josef Kliment, Lev |
author_facet | Holub, Zdenek Jabor, Antonín Bartos, Pavel Eim, Josef Kliment, Lev |
author_sort | Holub, Zdenek |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and determine the contribution of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of women with endometrial cancer and compare with the open technique. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was carried out on 120 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery (96 women) and open procedures (24 women) for endometrial cancer between April 1996 and March 2000. RESULTS: Four patients whose laparoscopic surgery was completed by laparotomy were excluded from the study. The other 92 laparoscopic procedures were successfully completed. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) was performed based on the grade of the tumor and the depth of myometrial invasion. Sixty-seven of the patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy (BSO), and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 25 women also had para-aortic lymph node sampling dissection. Eleven of these patients had positive pelvic or para-aortic nodes. The mean operating time for the laparoscopic procedure was significantly longer (173.8 min, P < 0.0001) than the time for the open procedure (135.0 min). The rate of complications was similar in both groups. The recovery time was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma is an attractive alternative to the abdominal surgical approach. The advantages of laparoscopically assisted surgical staging are patient related. Because the abdominal incision is avoided, the recovery time is reduced. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is a procedure that is appropriate, when applicable. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3043417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30434172011-03-22 Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study Holub, Zdenek Jabor, Antonín Bartos, Pavel Eim, Josef Kliment, Lev JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and determine the contribution of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of women with endometrial cancer and compare with the open technique. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was carried out on 120 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery (96 women) and open procedures (24 women) for endometrial cancer between April 1996 and March 2000. RESULTS: Four patients whose laparoscopic surgery was completed by laparotomy were excluded from the study. The other 92 laparoscopic procedures were successfully completed. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) was performed based on the grade of the tumor and the depth of myometrial invasion. Sixty-seven of the patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy (BSO), and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 25 women also had para-aortic lymph node sampling dissection. Eleven of these patients had positive pelvic or para-aortic nodes. The mean operating time for the laparoscopic procedure was significantly longer (173.8 min, P < 0.0001) than the time for the open procedure (135.0 min). The rate of complications was similar in both groups. The recovery time was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma is an attractive alternative to the abdominal surgical approach. The advantages of laparoscopically assisted surgical staging are patient related. Because the abdominal incision is avoided, the recovery time is reduced. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is a procedure that is appropriate, when applicable. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2002 /pmc/articles/PMC3043417/ /pubmed/12113415 Text en © 2002 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Holub, Zdenek Jabor, Antonín Bartos, Pavel Eim, Josef Kliment, Lev Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study |
title | Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study |
title_full | Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study |
title_short | Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study |
title_sort | laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12113415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holubzdenek laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy AT jaborantonin laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy AT bartospavel laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy AT eimjosef laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy AT klimentlev laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy |