Cargando…

Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and determine the contribution of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of women with endometrial cancer and compare with the open technique. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was carried out on 120 women who underwent laparoscopic sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holub, Zdenek, Jabor, Antonín, Bartos, Pavel, Eim, Josef, Kliment, Lev
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12113415
_version_ 1782198645368553472
author Holub, Zdenek
Jabor, Antonín
Bartos, Pavel
Eim, Josef
Kliment, Lev
author_facet Holub, Zdenek
Jabor, Antonín
Bartos, Pavel
Eim, Josef
Kliment, Lev
author_sort Holub, Zdenek
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and determine the contribution of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of women with endometrial cancer and compare with the open technique. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was carried out on 120 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery (96 women) and open procedures (24 women) for endometrial cancer between April 1996 and March 2000. RESULTS: Four patients whose laparoscopic surgery was completed by laparotomy were excluded from the study. The other 92 laparoscopic procedures were successfully completed. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) was performed based on the grade of the tumor and the depth of myometrial invasion. Sixty-seven of the patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy (BSO), and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 25 women also had para-aortic lymph node sampling dissection. Eleven of these patients had positive pelvic or para-aortic nodes. The mean operating time for the laparoscopic procedure was significantly longer (173.8 min, P < 0.0001) than the time for the open procedure (135.0 min). The rate of complications was similar in both groups. The recovery time was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma is an attractive alternative to the abdominal surgical approach. The advantages of laparoscopically assisted surgical staging are patient related. Because the abdominal incision is avoided, the recovery time is reduced. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is a procedure that is appropriate, when applicable.
format Text
id pubmed-3043417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30434172011-03-22 Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study Holub, Zdenek Jabor, Antonín Bartos, Pavel Eim, Josef Kliment, Lev JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and determine the contribution of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of women with endometrial cancer and compare with the open technique. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was carried out on 120 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery (96 women) and open procedures (24 women) for endometrial cancer between April 1996 and March 2000. RESULTS: Four patients whose laparoscopic surgery was completed by laparotomy were excluded from the study. The other 92 laparoscopic procedures were successfully completed. Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) was performed based on the grade of the tumor and the depth of myometrial invasion. Sixty-seven of the patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy (BSO), and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 25 women also had para-aortic lymph node sampling dissection. Eleven of these patients had positive pelvic or para-aortic nodes. The mean operating time for the laparoscopic procedure was significantly longer (173.8 min, P < 0.0001) than the time for the open procedure (135.0 min). The rate of complications was similar in both groups. The recovery time was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma is an attractive alternative to the abdominal surgical approach. The advantages of laparoscopically assisted surgical staging are patient related. Because the abdominal incision is avoided, the recovery time is reduced. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is a procedure that is appropriate, when applicable. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2002 /pmc/articles/PMC3043417/ /pubmed/12113415 Text en © 2002 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Holub, Zdenek
Jabor, Antonín
Bartos, Pavel
Eim, Josef
Kliment, Lev
Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
title Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
title_full Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
title_short Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study
title_sort laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a multicenter study
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12113415
work_keys_str_mv AT holubzdenek laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy
AT jaborantonin laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy
AT bartospavel laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy
AT eimjosef laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy
AT klimentlev laparoscopicpelviclymphadenectomyinthesurgicaltreatmentofendometrialcancerresultsofamulticenterstudy