Cargando…

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our case of robot-assisted ureterolysis (RU), describe our surgical technique, and review the literature on minimally invasive ureterolysis. METHODS: One patient managed with robot-assisted ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was identified. The chart was ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seixas-Mikelus, Stéfanie A., Marshall, Susan J., Stephens, D. Dawon, Blumenfeld, Aaron, Arnone, Eric D., Guru, Khurshid A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20932393
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12785289145088
_version_ 1782198664324710400
author Seixas-Mikelus, Stéfanie A.
Marshall, Susan J.
Stephens, D. Dawon
Blumenfeld, Aaron
Arnone, Eric D.
Guru, Khurshid A.
author_facet Seixas-Mikelus, Stéfanie A.
Marshall, Susan J.
Stephens, D. Dawon
Blumenfeld, Aaron
Arnone, Eric D.
Guru, Khurshid A.
author_sort Seixas-Mikelus, Stéfanie A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our case of robot-assisted ureterolysis (RU), describe our surgical technique, and review the literature on minimally invasive ureterolysis. METHODS: One patient managed with robot-assisted ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was identified. The chart was analyzed for demographics, operative parameters, and immediate postoperative outcome. The surgical technique was assessed and modified. Lastly, a review of the published literature on ureterolysis managed with minimally invasive surgery was performed. RESULTS: One patient underwent robot-assisted ureterolysis at our institution in 2 separate settings. Operative time (OR) decreased from 279 minutes to 191 minutes. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was less than 50mL. The patient has been free of symptoms and both renal units are unobstructed. According to the published literature, 302 renal units underwent successful laparoscopic ureterolysis (LU), and 6 renal units underwent RU. There were 9 open conversions (all in LU). Mean OR in LU was 248 minutes for unilateral and 386 minutes for bilateral cases. In RU, mean OR was 220 minutes for unilateral and 390 minutes for bilateral cases. EBL averaged 200mL in LU and 30 mL in RU. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal that robot-assisted ureterolysis is safe and feasible. Published data demonstrate the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.
format Text
id pubmed-3043593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30435932011-08-29 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach Seixas-Mikelus, Stéfanie A. Marshall, Susan J. Stephens, D. Dawon Blumenfeld, Aaron Arnone, Eric D. Guru, Khurshid A. JSLS Case Reports OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our case of robot-assisted ureterolysis (RU), describe our surgical technique, and review the literature on minimally invasive ureterolysis. METHODS: One patient managed with robot-assisted ureterolysis for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis was identified. The chart was analyzed for demographics, operative parameters, and immediate postoperative outcome. The surgical technique was assessed and modified. Lastly, a review of the published literature on ureterolysis managed with minimally invasive surgery was performed. RESULTS: One patient underwent robot-assisted ureterolysis at our institution in 2 separate settings. Operative time (OR) decreased from 279 minutes to 191 minutes. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was less than 50mL. The patient has been free of symptoms and both renal units are unobstructed. According to the published literature, 302 renal units underwent successful laparoscopic ureterolysis (LU), and 6 renal units underwent RU. There were 9 open conversions (all in LU). Mean OR in LU was 248 minutes for unilateral and 386 minutes for bilateral cases. In RU, mean OR was 220 minutes for unilateral and 390 minutes for bilateral cases. EBL averaged 200mL in LU and 30 mL in RU. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal that robot-assisted ureterolysis is safe and feasible. Published data demonstrate the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3043593/ /pubmed/20932393 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12785289145088 Text en © 2010 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Seixas-Mikelus, Stéfanie A.
Marshall, Susan J.
Stephens, D. Dawon
Blumenfeld, Aaron
Arnone, Eric D.
Guru, Khurshid A.
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach
title Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach
title_full Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach
title_fullStr Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach
title_short Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureterolysis: Case Report and Literature Review of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach
title_sort robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterolysis: case report and literature review of the minimally invasive surgical approach
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20932393
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680810X12785289145088
work_keys_str_mv AT seixasmikelusstefaniea robotassistedlaparoscopicureterolysiscasereportandliteraturereviewoftheminimallyinvasivesurgicalapproach
AT marshallsusanj robotassistedlaparoscopicureterolysiscasereportandliteraturereviewoftheminimallyinvasivesurgicalapproach
AT stephensddawon robotassistedlaparoscopicureterolysiscasereportandliteraturereviewoftheminimallyinvasivesurgicalapproach
AT blumenfeldaaron robotassistedlaparoscopicureterolysiscasereportandliteraturereviewoftheminimallyinvasivesurgicalapproach
AT arnoneericd robotassistedlaparoscopicureterolysiscasereportandliteraturereviewoftheminimallyinvasivesurgicalapproach
AT gurukhurshida robotassistedlaparoscopicureterolysiscasereportandliteraturereviewoftheminimallyinvasivesurgicalapproach