Cargando…
Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population
OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of life valuation of a hypothetical depression health state between a general population versus a depressive patient population, and within a patient population. METHOD: In a self-administered Internet questionnaire, both patient and general population groups filled...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20882357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9746-x |
_version_ | 1782198676055130112 |
---|---|
author | Gerhards, Sylvia A. H. Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Sabel, Philip W. M. Huibers, Marcus J. H. |
author_facet | Gerhards, Sylvia A. H. Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Sabel, Philip W. M. Huibers, Marcus J. H. |
author_sort | Gerhards, Sylvia A. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of life valuation of a hypothetical depression health state between a general population versus a depressive patient population, and within a patient population. METHOD: In a self-administered Internet questionnaire, both patient and general population groups filled in the Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire for a hypothetical depression health state describing mild (N = 740), moderate (N = 691), or severe (N = 670) depression and valued it using a rating scale (RS). The ‘patient’ group consisted of people reporting depressive complaints on the Internet questionnaire, subdivided into three depression severity groups (mild, moderate, severe) based on the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) and two groups according to self-perceived duration (≤3 months, ≥4 months) of depressive complaints (SPDD). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the patient and general population and within the patient population on RS outcomes and on the Euroqol domains usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The direction of the differences shows that subgroups with higher severity or longer duration of depressive complaints value depression health states worse compared with subgroups with less severe complaints, a shorter duration, or no depressive complaints. Moreover, the discrepancy in valuation of a health state between different subgroups changes according to the severity of the health state described. CONCLUSION: There are discrepancies in the valuation of a hypothetical depression health state between a patient and general population, whereby depression leads to a worse valuation. But also within the patient population, the valuation differs according to depression severity and duration. Identification with the hypothetical health state description might explain the varying differences found between subgroups for the different hypothetical health state descriptions. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3044084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30440842011-04-04 Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population Gerhards, Sylvia A. H. Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Sabel, Philip W. M. Huibers, Marcus J. H. Qual Life Res Brief Communication OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of life valuation of a hypothetical depression health state between a general population versus a depressive patient population, and within a patient population. METHOD: In a self-administered Internet questionnaire, both patient and general population groups filled in the Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire for a hypothetical depression health state describing mild (N = 740), moderate (N = 691), or severe (N = 670) depression and valued it using a rating scale (RS). The ‘patient’ group consisted of people reporting depressive complaints on the Internet questionnaire, subdivided into three depression severity groups (mild, moderate, severe) based on the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) and two groups according to self-perceived duration (≤3 months, ≥4 months) of depressive complaints (SPDD). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the patient and general population and within the patient population on RS outcomes and on the Euroqol domains usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The direction of the differences shows that subgroups with higher severity or longer duration of depressive complaints value depression health states worse compared with subgroups with less severe complaints, a shorter duration, or no depressive complaints. Moreover, the discrepancy in valuation of a health state between different subgroups changes according to the severity of the health state described. CONCLUSION: There are discrepancies in the valuation of a hypothetical depression health state between a patient and general population, whereby depression leads to a worse valuation. But also within the patient population, the valuation differs according to depression severity and duration. Identification with the hypothetical health state description might explain the varying differences found between subgroups for the different hypothetical health state descriptions. Springer Netherlands 2010-09-30 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3044084/ /pubmed/20882357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9746-x Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Gerhards, Sylvia A. H. Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Sabel, Philip W. M. Huibers, Marcus J. H. Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
title | Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
title_full | Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
title_fullStr | Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
title_short | Discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
title_sort | discrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general population |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20882357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9746-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gerhardssylviaah discrepancyinratinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeofdepressionbetweenpatientandgeneralpopulation AT everssilviamaa discrepancyinratinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeofdepressionbetweenpatientandgeneralpopulation AT sabelphilipwm discrepancyinratinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeofdepressionbetweenpatientandgeneralpopulation AT huibersmarcusjh discrepancyinratinghealthrelatedqualityoflifeofdepressionbetweenpatientandgeneralpopulation |