Cargando…

Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ho, Christopher C K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000100033
_version_ 1782198742336667648
author Ho, Christopher C K
author_facet Ho, Christopher C K
author_sort Ho, Christopher C K
collection PubMed
description
format Text
id pubmed-3044584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30445842011-02-24 Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones Ho, Christopher C K Clinics (Sao Paulo) Letter to the Editor Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2011-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3044584/ /pubmed/21437459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000100033 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Ho, Christopher C K
Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
title Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
title_full Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
title_fullStr Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
title_full_unstemmed Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
title_short Re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
title_sort re: comparison between two shock wave regimens using frequencies of 60 and 90 impulses per minute for urinary stones
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000100033
work_keys_str_mv AT hochristopherck recomparisonbetweentwoshockwaveregimensusingfrequenciesof60and90impulsesperminuteforurinarystones