Cargando…

Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals

BACKGROUND: Qualitative research appears to be gaining acceptability in medical journals. Yet, little is actually known about the proportion of qualitative research and factors affecting its publication. This study describes the proportion of qualitative research over a 10 year period and correlates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shuval, Kerem, Harker, Karen, Roudsari, Bahman, Groce, Nora E., Mills, Britain, Siddiqi, Zoveen, Shachak, Aviv
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016937
_version_ 1782198762078208000
author Shuval, Kerem
Harker, Karen
Roudsari, Bahman
Groce, Nora E.
Mills, Britain
Siddiqi, Zoveen
Shachak, Aviv
author_facet Shuval, Kerem
Harker, Karen
Roudsari, Bahman
Groce, Nora E.
Mills, Britain
Siddiqi, Zoveen
Shachak, Aviv
author_sort Shuval, Kerem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Qualitative research appears to be gaining acceptability in medical journals. Yet, little is actually known about the proportion of qualitative research and factors affecting its publication. This study describes the proportion of qualitative research over a 10 year period and correlates associated with its publication. DESIGN: A quantitative longitudinal examination of the proportion of original qualitative research in 67 journals of general medicine during a 10 year period (1998–2007). The proportion of qualitative research was determined by dividing original qualitative studies published (numerator) by all original research articles published (denominator). We used a generalized estimating equations approach to assess the longitudinal association between the proportion of qualitative studies and independent variables (i.e. journals' country of publication and impact factor; editorial/methodological papers discussing qualitative research; and specific journal guidelines pertaining to qualitative research). FINDINGS: A 2.9% absolute increase and 3.4-fold relative increase in qualitative research publications occurred over a 10 year period (1.2% in 1998 vs. 4.1% in 2007). The proportion of original qualitative research was independently and significantly associated with the publication of editorial/methodological papers in the journal (b = 3.688, P = 0.012); and with qualitative research specifically mentioned in guidelines for authors (b = 6.847, P<0.001). Additionally, a higher proportion of qualitative research was associated only with journals published in the UK in comparison to other countries, yet with borderline statistical significance (b = 1.776, P = 0.075). The journals' impact factor was not associated with the publication of qualitative research. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the proportion of qualitative research in medical journals over a 10 year period, the proportion remains low. Journals' policies pertaining to qualitative research, as expressed by the appearance of specific guidelines and editorials/methodological papers on the subject, are independently associated with the publication of original qualitative research; irrespective of the journals' impact factor.
format Text
id pubmed-3044713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30447132011-03-07 Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals Shuval, Kerem Harker, Karen Roudsari, Bahman Groce, Nora E. Mills, Britain Siddiqi, Zoveen Shachak, Aviv PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Qualitative research appears to be gaining acceptability in medical journals. Yet, little is actually known about the proportion of qualitative research and factors affecting its publication. This study describes the proportion of qualitative research over a 10 year period and correlates associated with its publication. DESIGN: A quantitative longitudinal examination of the proportion of original qualitative research in 67 journals of general medicine during a 10 year period (1998–2007). The proportion of qualitative research was determined by dividing original qualitative studies published (numerator) by all original research articles published (denominator). We used a generalized estimating equations approach to assess the longitudinal association between the proportion of qualitative studies and independent variables (i.e. journals' country of publication and impact factor; editorial/methodological papers discussing qualitative research; and specific journal guidelines pertaining to qualitative research). FINDINGS: A 2.9% absolute increase and 3.4-fold relative increase in qualitative research publications occurred over a 10 year period (1.2% in 1998 vs. 4.1% in 2007). The proportion of original qualitative research was independently and significantly associated with the publication of editorial/methodological papers in the journal (b = 3.688, P = 0.012); and with qualitative research specifically mentioned in guidelines for authors (b = 6.847, P<0.001). Additionally, a higher proportion of qualitative research was associated only with journals published in the UK in comparison to other countries, yet with borderline statistical significance (b = 1.776, P = 0.075). The journals' impact factor was not associated with the publication of qualitative research. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the proportion of qualitative research in medical journals over a 10 year period, the proportion remains low. Journals' policies pertaining to qualitative research, as expressed by the appearance of specific guidelines and editorials/methodological papers on the subject, are independently associated with the publication of original qualitative research; irrespective of the journals' impact factor. Public Library of Science 2011-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3044713/ /pubmed/21383987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016937 Text en Shuval et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shuval, Kerem
Harker, Karen
Roudsari, Bahman
Groce, Nora E.
Mills, Britain
Siddiqi, Zoveen
Shachak, Aviv
Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals
title Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals
title_full Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals
title_fullStr Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals
title_full_unstemmed Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals
title_short Is Qualitative Research Second Class Science? A Quantitative Longitudinal Examination of Qualitative Research in Medical Journals
title_sort is qualitative research second class science? a quantitative longitudinal examination of qualitative research in medical journals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016937
work_keys_str_mv AT shuvalkerem isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals
AT harkerkaren isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals
AT roudsaribahman isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals
AT grocenorae isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals
AT millsbritain isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals
AT siddiqizoveen isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals
AT shachakaviv isqualitativeresearchsecondclassscienceaquantitativelongitudinalexaminationofqualitativeresearchinmedicaljournals