Cargando…

Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the single most prevalent cancer in US men whose gold standard of diagnosis is histologic assessment of biopsies. Manual assessment of stained tissue of all biopsies limits speed and accuracy in clinical practice and research of prostate cancer diagnosis. We sought to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwak, Jin Tae, Hewitt, Stephen M, Sinha, Saurabh, Bhargava, Rohit
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3045985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-62
_version_ 1782198899114508288
author Kwak, Jin Tae
Hewitt, Stephen M
Sinha, Saurabh
Bhargava, Rohit
author_facet Kwak, Jin Tae
Hewitt, Stephen M
Sinha, Saurabh
Bhargava, Rohit
author_sort Kwak, Jin Tae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the single most prevalent cancer in US men whose gold standard of diagnosis is histologic assessment of biopsies. Manual assessment of stained tissue of all biopsies limits speed and accuracy in clinical practice and research of prostate cancer diagnosis. We sought to develop a fully-automated multimodal microscopy method to distinguish cancerous from non-cancerous tissue samples. METHODS: We recorded chemical data from an unstained tissue microarray (TMA) using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic imaging. Using pattern recognition, we identified epithelial cells without user input. We fused the cell type information with the corresponding stained images commonly used in clinical practice. Extracted morphological features, optimized by two-stage feature selection method using a minimum-redundancy-maximal-relevance (mRMR) criterion and sequential floating forward selection (SFFS), were applied to classify tissue samples as cancer or non-cancer. RESULTS: We achieved high accuracy (area under ROC curve (AUC) >0.97) in cross-validations on each of two data sets that were stained under different conditions. When the classifier was trained on one data set and tested on the other data set, an AUC value of ~0.95 was observed. In the absence of IR data, the performance of the same classification system dropped for both data sets and between data sets. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to achieve very effective fusion of the information from two different images that provide very different types of data with different characteristics. The method is entirely transparent to a user and does not involve any adjustment or decision-making based on spectral data. By combining the IR and optical data, we achieved high accurate classification.
format Text
id pubmed-3045985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30459852011-03-01 Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer Kwak, Jin Tae Hewitt, Stephen M Sinha, Saurabh Bhargava, Rohit BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the single most prevalent cancer in US men whose gold standard of diagnosis is histologic assessment of biopsies. Manual assessment of stained tissue of all biopsies limits speed and accuracy in clinical practice and research of prostate cancer diagnosis. We sought to develop a fully-automated multimodal microscopy method to distinguish cancerous from non-cancerous tissue samples. METHODS: We recorded chemical data from an unstained tissue microarray (TMA) using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic imaging. Using pattern recognition, we identified epithelial cells without user input. We fused the cell type information with the corresponding stained images commonly used in clinical practice. Extracted morphological features, optimized by two-stage feature selection method using a minimum-redundancy-maximal-relevance (mRMR) criterion and sequential floating forward selection (SFFS), were applied to classify tissue samples as cancer or non-cancer. RESULTS: We achieved high accuracy (area under ROC curve (AUC) >0.97) in cross-validations on each of two data sets that were stained under different conditions. When the classifier was trained on one data set and tested on the other data set, an AUC value of ~0.95 was observed. In the absence of IR data, the performance of the same classification system dropped for both data sets and between data sets. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to achieve very effective fusion of the information from two different images that provide very different types of data with different characteristics. The method is entirely transparent to a user and does not involve any adjustment or decision-making based on spectral data. By combining the IR and optical data, we achieved high accurate classification. BioMed Central 2011-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3045985/ /pubmed/21303560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-62 Text en Copyright ©2011 Kwak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kwak, Jin Tae
Hewitt, Stephen M
Sinha, Saurabh
Bhargava, Rohit
Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
title Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
title_full Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
title_fullStr Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
title_short Multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
title_sort multimodal microscopy for automated histologic analysis of prostate cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3045985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-62
work_keys_str_mv AT kwakjintae multimodalmicroscopyforautomatedhistologicanalysisofprostatecancer
AT hewittstephenm multimodalmicroscopyforautomatedhistologicanalysisofprostatecancer
AT sinhasaurabh multimodalmicroscopyforautomatedhistologicanalysisofprostatecancer
AT bhargavarohit multimodalmicroscopyforautomatedhistologicanalysisofprostatecancer