Cargando…
CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
Prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction amounts to 50% of all cases with heart failure. Diagnosis assessment requires evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Currently, echocardiography is the method of choice for diastolic function testing in clinic...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Current Science Inc.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z |
_version_ | 1782199065269764096 |
---|---|
author | Westenberg, Jos J. M. |
author_facet | Westenberg, Jos J. M. |
author_sort | Westenberg, Jos J. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction amounts to 50% of all cases with heart failure. Diagnosis assessment requires evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Currently, echocardiography is the method of choice for diastolic function testing in clinical practice. Various applications are in use and recommended criteria are followed for classifying the severity of dysfunction. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a variety of alternative applications for evaluation of diastolic function, some superior to echocardiography in accuracy and reproducibility, some being complementary. In this article, the role of the available CMR applications for diastolic function testing in clinical practice and research is reviewed and compared to echocardiography. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3047728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Current Science Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30477282011-04-05 CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function Westenberg, Jos J. M. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep Article Prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction amounts to 50% of all cases with heart failure. Diagnosis assessment requires evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Currently, echocardiography is the method of choice for diastolic function testing in clinical practice. Various applications are in use and recommended criteria are followed for classifying the severity of dysfunction. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a variety of alternative applications for evaluation of diastolic function, some superior to echocardiography in accuracy and reproducibility, some being complementary. In this article, the role of the available CMR applications for diastolic function testing in clinical practice and research is reviewed and compared to echocardiography. Current Science Inc. 2011-01-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3047728/ /pubmed/21475412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Westenberg, Jos J. M. CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function |
title | CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function |
title_full | CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function |
title_fullStr | CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function |
title_full_unstemmed | CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function |
title_short | CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function |
title_sort | cmr for assessment of diastolic function |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT westenbergjosjm cmrforassessmentofdiastolicfunction |