Cargando…

CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function

Prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction amounts to 50% of all cases with heart failure. Diagnosis assessment requires evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Currently, echocardiography is the method of choice for diastolic function testing in clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Westenberg, Jos J. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Current Science Inc. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z
_version_ 1782199065269764096
author Westenberg, Jos J. M.
author_facet Westenberg, Jos J. M.
author_sort Westenberg, Jos J. M.
collection PubMed
description Prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction amounts to 50% of all cases with heart failure. Diagnosis assessment requires evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Currently, echocardiography is the method of choice for diastolic function testing in clinical practice. Various applications are in use and recommended criteria are followed for classifying the severity of dysfunction. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a variety of alternative applications for evaluation of diastolic function, some superior to echocardiography in accuracy and reproducibility, some being complementary. In this article, the role of the available CMR applications for diastolic function testing in clinical practice and research is reviewed and compared to echocardiography.
format Text
id pubmed-3047728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Current Science Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30477282011-04-05 CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function Westenberg, Jos J. M. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep Article Prevalence of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction amounts to 50% of all cases with heart failure. Diagnosis assessment requires evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Currently, echocardiography is the method of choice for diastolic function testing in clinical practice. Various applications are in use and recommended criteria are followed for classifying the severity of dysfunction. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers a variety of alternative applications for evaluation of diastolic function, some superior to echocardiography in accuracy and reproducibility, some being complementary. In this article, the role of the available CMR applications for diastolic function testing in clinical practice and research is reviewed and compared to echocardiography. Current Science Inc. 2011-01-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3047728/ /pubmed/21475412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
title CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
title_full CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
title_fullStr CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
title_full_unstemmed CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
title_short CMR for Assessment of Diastolic Function
title_sort cmr for assessment of diastolic function
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21475412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z
work_keys_str_mv AT westenbergjosjm cmrforassessmentofdiastolicfunction