Cargando…

Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006

BACKGROUND: Observation evaluation is an alternate pathway to inpatient admission following Emergency Department (ED) assessment. AIMS: We aimed to describe the variation in observation use and charges between acute care hospitals in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2006. METHODS: Retrospective pilot anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuur, Jeremiah D., Venkatesh, Arjun K., Bohan, J. Stephen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21373306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0188-6
_version_ 1782199082139254784
author Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Bohan, J. Stephen
author_facet Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Bohan, J. Stephen
author_sort Schuur, Jeremiah D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Observation evaluation is an alternate pathway to inpatient admission following Emergency Department (ED) assessment. AIMS: We aimed to describe the variation in observation use and charges between acute care hospitals in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2006. METHODS: Retrospective pilot analysis of hospital administrative data. Patients discharged from a Massachusetts hospital between 2003 and 2006 after an observation visit or inpatient hospitalization for six emergency medical conditions, grouped by the Clinical Classification System (CCS), were included. Patients discharged with a primary obstetric condition were excluded. The primary outcome measure, “Observation Proportion” (pOBS), was the use of observation evaluation relative to inpatient evaluation (pOBS = n Observation/(n Observation + n Inpatient). We calculated pOBS, descriptive statistics of use and charges by the hospital for each condition. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2006 the number of observation visits in Massachusetts increased 3.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8% to 4.0%] from 128,825 to 133,859, while inpatient hospitalization increased 1.29% (95% CI 1.26% to 1.31%) from 832,415 to 843,617. Nonspecific chest pain (CCS 102) was the most frequently observed condition with 85,843 (16.3% of total) observation evaluations. Observation visits for nonspecific chest pain increased 43.5% from 2003 to 2006. Relative observation utilization (pOBS) for nonspecific chest pain ranged from 25% to 95% across hospitals. Wide variation in hospital use of observation and charges was seen for all six emergency medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: There was wide variation in use of observation across six common emergency conditions in Massachusetts in this pilot analysis. This variation may have a substantial impact on hospital resource utilization. Further investigation into the patient, provider and hospital-level characteristics that explain the variation in observation use could help improve hospital efficiency.
format Text
id pubmed-3047847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30478472011-03-03 Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006 Schuur, Jeremiah D. Venkatesh, Arjun K. Bohan, J. Stephen Int J Emerg Med Brief Research Report BACKGROUND: Observation evaluation is an alternate pathway to inpatient admission following Emergency Department (ED) assessment. AIMS: We aimed to describe the variation in observation use and charges between acute care hospitals in Massachusetts from 2003 to 2006. METHODS: Retrospective pilot analysis of hospital administrative data. Patients discharged from a Massachusetts hospital between 2003 and 2006 after an observation visit or inpatient hospitalization for six emergency medical conditions, grouped by the Clinical Classification System (CCS), were included. Patients discharged with a primary obstetric condition were excluded. The primary outcome measure, “Observation Proportion” (pOBS), was the use of observation evaluation relative to inpatient evaluation (pOBS = n Observation/(n Observation + n Inpatient). We calculated pOBS, descriptive statistics of use and charges by the hospital for each condition. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2006 the number of observation visits in Massachusetts increased 3.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8% to 4.0%] from 128,825 to 133,859, while inpatient hospitalization increased 1.29% (95% CI 1.26% to 1.31%) from 832,415 to 843,617. Nonspecific chest pain (CCS 102) was the most frequently observed condition with 85,843 (16.3% of total) observation evaluations. Observation visits for nonspecific chest pain increased 43.5% from 2003 to 2006. Relative observation utilization (pOBS) for nonspecific chest pain ranged from 25% to 95% across hospitals. Wide variation in hospital use of observation and charges was seen for all six emergency medical conditions. CONCLUSIONS: There was wide variation in use of observation across six common emergency conditions in Massachusetts in this pilot analysis. This variation may have a substantial impact on hospital resource utilization. Further investigation into the patient, provider and hospital-level characteristics that explain the variation in observation use could help improve hospital efficiency. Springer-Verlag 2010-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3047847/ /pubmed/21373306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0188-6 Text en © Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2010
spellingShingle Brief Research Report
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Bohan, J. Stephen
Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
title Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
title_full Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
title_fullStr Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
title_full_unstemmed Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
title_short Variation in the use of observation status evaluation in Massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
title_sort variation in the use of observation status evaluation in massachusetts acute care hospitals, 2003–2006
topic Brief Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21373306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12245-010-0188-6
work_keys_str_mv AT schuurjeremiahd variationintheuseofobservationstatusevaluationinmassachusettsacutecarehospitals20032006
AT venkatesharjunk variationintheuseofobservationstatusevaluationinmassachusettsacutecarehospitals20032006
AT bohanjstephen variationintheuseofobservationstatusevaluationinmassachusettsacutecarehospitals20032006