Cargando…

HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm

BACKGROUND: Recently, a Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) utilising human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and CA125 successfully classified patients as presenting a high or low risk for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We validated this algorithm in an independent prospective study. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Gorp, T, Cadron, I, Despierre, E, Daemen, A, Leunen, K, Amant, F, Timmerman, D, De Moor, B, Vergote, I
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092
_version_ 1782199129078759424
author Van Gorp, T
Cadron, I
Despierre, E
Daemen, A
Leunen, K
Amant, F
Timmerman, D
De Moor, B
Vergote, I
author_facet Van Gorp, T
Cadron, I
Despierre, E
Daemen, A
Leunen, K
Amant, F
Timmerman, D
De Moor, B
Vergote, I
author_sort Van Gorp, T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, a Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) utilising human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and CA125 successfully classified patients as presenting a high or low risk for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We validated this algorithm in an independent prospective study. METHODS: Women with a pelvic mass, who were scheduled to have surgery, were enrolled in a prospective study. Preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 were measured in 389 patients. The performance of each of the markers, as well as that of ROMA, was analysed. RESULTS: When all malignant tumours were included, ROMA (receiver operator characteristic (ROC)-area under curve (AUC)=0.898) and HE4 (ROC-AUC)=0.857) did not perform significantly better than CA125 alone (ROC–AUC=0.877). Using a cutoff for ROMA of 12.5% for pre-menopausal patients, the test had a sensitivity of 67.5% and a specificity of 87.9%. With a cutoff of 14.4% for post-menopausal patients, the test had a sensitivity of 90.8% and a specificity of 66.3%. For EOC vs benign disease, the ROC–AUC of ROMA increased to 0.913 and for invasive EOC vs benign disease to 0.957. CONCLUSION: This independent validation study demonstrated similar performance indices to those recently published. However, in this study, HE4 and ROMA did not increase the detection of malignant disease compared with CA125 alone. Although the initial reports were promising, measurement of HE4 serum levels does not contribute to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-3048204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30482042012-03-01 HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm Van Gorp, T Cadron, I Despierre, E Daemen, A Leunen, K Amant, F Timmerman, D De Moor, B Vergote, I Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Recently, a Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) utilising human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and CA125 successfully classified patients as presenting a high or low risk for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We validated this algorithm in an independent prospective study. METHODS: Women with a pelvic mass, who were scheduled to have surgery, were enrolled in a prospective study. Preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 were measured in 389 patients. The performance of each of the markers, as well as that of ROMA, was analysed. RESULTS: When all malignant tumours were included, ROMA (receiver operator characteristic (ROC)-area under curve (AUC)=0.898) and HE4 (ROC-AUC)=0.857) did not perform significantly better than CA125 alone (ROC–AUC=0.877). Using a cutoff for ROMA of 12.5% for pre-menopausal patients, the test had a sensitivity of 67.5% and a specificity of 87.9%. With a cutoff of 14.4% for post-menopausal patients, the test had a sensitivity of 90.8% and a specificity of 66.3%. For EOC vs benign disease, the ROC–AUC of ROMA increased to 0.913 and for invasive EOC vs benign disease to 0.957. CONCLUSION: This independent validation study demonstrated similar performance indices to those recently published. However, in this study, HE4 and ROMA did not increase the detection of malignant disease compared with CA125 alone. Although the initial reports were promising, measurement of HE4 serum levels does not contribute to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2011-03-01 2011-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3048204/ /pubmed/21304524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Van Gorp, T
Cadron, I
Despierre, E
Daemen, A
Leunen, K
Amant, F
Timmerman, D
De Moor, B
Vergote, I
HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
title HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
title_full HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
title_fullStr HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
title_short HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
title_sort he4 and ca125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092
work_keys_str_mv AT vangorpt he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT cadroni he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT despierree he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT daemena he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT leunenk he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT amantf he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT timmermand he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT demoorb he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm
AT vergotei he4andca125asadiagnostictestinovariancancerprospectivevalidationoftheriskofovarianmalignancyalgorithm