Cargando…

Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections

BACKGROUND: Two NF-kappaB signaling pathways, Toll and immune deficiency (imd), are required for survival to bacterial infections in Drosophila. In response to septic injury, these pathways mediate rapid transcriptional activation of distinct sets of effector molecules, including antimicrobial pepti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nehme, Nadine T., Quintin, Jessica, Cho, Ju Hyun, Lee, Janice, Lafarge, Marie-Céline, Kocks, Christine, Ferrandon, Dominique
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21390224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014743
_version_ 1782199152800694272
author Nehme, Nadine T.
Quintin, Jessica
Cho, Ju Hyun
Lee, Janice
Lafarge, Marie-Céline
Kocks, Christine
Ferrandon, Dominique
author_facet Nehme, Nadine T.
Quintin, Jessica
Cho, Ju Hyun
Lee, Janice
Lafarge, Marie-Céline
Kocks, Christine
Ferrandon, Dominique
author_sort Nehme, Nadine T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two NF-kappaB signaling pathways, Toll and immune deficiency (imd), are required for survival to bacterial infections in Drosophila. In response to septic injury, these pathways mediate rapid transcriptional activation of distinct sets of effector molecules, including antimicrobial peptides, which are important components of a humoral defense response. However, it is less clear to what extent macrophage-like hemocytes contribute to host defense. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In order to dissect the relative importance of humoral and cellular defenses after septic injury with three different Gram-positive bacteria (Micrococcus luteus, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus), we used latex bead pre-injection to ablate macrophage function in flies wildtype or mutant for various Toll and imd pathway components. We found that in all three infection models a compromised phagocytic system impaired fly survival – independently of concomitant Toll or imd pathway activation. Our data failed to confirm a role of the PGRP-SA and GNBP1 Pattern Recognition Receptors for phagocytosis of S. aureus. The Drosophila scavenger receptor Eater mediates the phagocytosis by hemocytes or S2 cells of E. faecalis and S. aureus, but not of M. luteus. In the case of M. luteus and E. faecalis, but not S. aureus, decreased survival due to defective phagocytosis could be compensated for by genetically enhancing the humoral immune response. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results underscore the fundamental importance of both cellular and humoral mechanisms in Drosophila immunity and shed light on the balance between these two arms of host defense depending on the invading pathogen.
format Text
id pubmed-3048390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30483902011-03-09 Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections Nehme, Nadine T. Quintin, Jessica Cho, Ju Hyun Lee, Janice Lafarge, Marie-Céline Kocks, Christine Ferrandon, Dominique PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Two NF-kappaB signaling pathways, Toll and immune deficiency (imd), are required for survival to bacterial infections in Drosophila. In response to septic injury, these pathways mediate rapid transcriptional activation of distinct sets of effector molecules, including antimicrobial peptides, which are important components of a humoral defense response. However, it is less clear to what extent macrophage-like hemocytes contribute to host defense. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In order to dissect the relative importance of humoral and cellular defenses after septic injury with three different Gram-positive bacteria (Micrococcus luteus, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus), we used latex bead pre-injection to ablate macrophage function in flies wildtype or mutant for various Toll and imd pathway components. We found that in all three infection models a compromised phagocytic system impaired fly survival – independently of concomitant Toll or imd pathway activation. Our data failed to confirm a role of the PGRP-SA and GNBP1 Pattern Recognition Receptors for phagocytosis of S. aureus. The Drosophila scavenger receptor Eater mediates the phagocytosis by hemocytes or S2 cells of E. faecalis and S. aureus, but not of M. luteus. In the case of M. luteus and E. faecalis, but not S. aureus, decreased survival due to defective phagocytosis could be compensated for by genetically enhancing the humoral immune response. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results underscore the fundamental importance of both cellular and humoral mechanisms in Drosophila immunity and shed light on the balance between these two arms of host defense depending on the invading pathogen. Public Library of Science 2011-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3048390/ /pubmed/21390224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014743 Text en Nehme et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nehme, Nadine T.
Quintin, Jessica
Cho, Ju Hyun
Lee, Janice
Lafarge, Marie-Céline
Kocks, Christine
Ferrandon, Dominique
Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
title Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
title_full Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
title_fullStr Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
title_full_unstemmed Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
title_short Relative Roles of the Cellular and Humoral Responses in the Drosophila Host Defense against Three Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
title_sort relative roles of the cellular and humoral responses in the drosophila host defense against three gram-positive bacterial infections
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21390224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014743
work_keys_str_mv AT nehmenadinet relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections
AT quintinjessica relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections
AT chojuhyun relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections
AT leejanice relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections
AT lafargemarieceline relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections
AT kockschristine relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections
AT ferrandondominique relativerolesofthecellularandhumoralresponsesinthedrosophilahostdefenseagainstthreegrampositivebacterialinfections