Cargando…

Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants

BACKGROUND: The objective of this process evaluation study was to gain insight into the reach, compliance, appreciation, usage barriers, and users' perceived effectiveness of a web-based intervention http://www.wiagesprek.nl. This intervention was aimed at empowerment of disability claimants, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samoocha, David, Snels, Ingrid AK, Bruinvels, David J, Anema, Johannes R, Kowalczyk, Wojtek, van der Beek, Allard J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21324172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-10
_version_ 1782199162540916736
author Samoocha, David
Snels, Ingrid AK
Bruinvels, David J
Anema, Johannes R
Kowalczyk, Wojtek
van der Beek, Allard J
author_facet Samoocha, David
Snels, Ingrid AK
Bruinvels, David J
Anema, Johannes R
Kowalczyk, Wojtek
van der Beek, Allard J
author_sort Samoocha, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this process evaluation study was to gain insight into the reach, compliance, appreciation, usage barriers, and users' perceived effectiveness of a web-based intervention http://www.wiagesprek.nl. This intervention was aimed at empowerment of disability claimants, prior to the assessment of disability by an insurance physician. METHODS: Reach was determined by registering claimants exposed to the study's invitation brochures, and by comparing trial participant characteristics with non-participants and nationwide claimant data. Compliance was registered by analyzing weblogs, which were automatically collected during the period of the trial. This made it possible to analyze individual use of the intervention. Appreciation, usage barriers, and users' perceived effectiveness were assessed using an online questionnaire that was sent to participants from the intervention group, 6 weeks after enrolment. RESULTS: Only 9% of the target population enrolled in the internet program. Because of selective enrolment, more females, higher educated claimants, and less ethnical minorities were reached. Compliance was ambiguous: out of the 123 participants randomized into the intervention group, a significant proportion (33%) did not use the intervention at all, while, at the same time, many participants (32%) used the intervention for more than two hours (i.e. in approximately two weeks). Overall satisfaction with the intervention was good. Claimants perceived the intervention most effective in increasing knowledge, while also a fair amount of users perceived the intervention effective in gaining right expectations or being able to communicate better with their physician. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of the intervention http://www.wiagesprek.nl was disappointing. Specifically, the poor reach and compliance of the intervention resulted in a small proportion of the target population using the intervention as intended. Improvements in the implementation process are desirable to increase the reach and compliance and, thereby possibly, the impact of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR-1414
format Text
id pubmed-3048479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30484792011-03-05 Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants Samoocha, David Snels, Ingrid AK Bruinvels, David J Anema, Johannes R Kowalczyk, Wojtek van der Beek, Allard J BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this process evaluation study was to gain insight into the reach, compliance, appreciation, usage barriers, and users' perceived effectiveness of a web-based intervention http://www.wiagesprek.nl. This intervention was aimed at empowerment of disability claimants, prior to the assessment of disability by an insurance physician. METHODS: Reach was determined by registering claimants exposed to the study's invitation brochures, and by comparing trial participant characteristics with non-participants and nationwide claimant data. Compliance was registered by analyzing weblogs, which were automatically collected during the period of the trial. This made it possible to analyze individual use of the intervention. Appreciation, usage barriers, and users' perceived effectiveness were assessed using an online questionnaire that was sent to participants from the intervention group, 6 weeks after enrolment. RESULTS: Only 9% of the target population enrolled in the internet program. Because of selective enrolment, more females, higher educated claimants, and less ethnical minorities were reached. Compliance was ambiguous: out of the 123 participants randomized into the intervention group, a significant proportion (33%) did not use the intervention at all, while, at the same time, many participants (32%) used the intervention for more than two hours (i.e. in approximately two weeks). Overall satisfaction with the intervention was good. Claimants perceived the intervention most effective in increasing knowledge, while also a fair amount of users perceived the intervention effective in gaining right expectations or being able to communicate better with their physician. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of the intervention http://www.wiagesprek.nl was disappointing. Specifically, the poor reach and compliance of the intervention resulted in a small proportion of the target population using the intervention as intended. Improvements in the implementation process are desirable to increase the reach and compliance and, thereby possibly, the impact of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR-1414 BioMed Central 2011-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3048479/ /pubmed/21324172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-10 Text en Copyright ©2011 Samoocha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Samoocha, David
Snels, Ingrid AK
Bruinvels, David J
Anema, Johannes R
Kowalczyk, Wojtek
van der Beek, Allard J
Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
title Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
title_full Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
title_fullStr Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
title_short Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
title_sort process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21324172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-10
work_keys_str_mv AT samoochadavid processevaluationofawebbasedinterventionaimedatempowermentofdisabilitybenefitclaimants
AT snelsingridak processevaluationofawebbasedinterventionaimedatempowermentofdisabilitybenefitclaimants
AT bruinvelsdavidj processevaluationofawebbasedinterventionaimedatempowermentofdisabilitybenefitclaimants
AT anemajohannesr processevaluationofawebbasedinterventionaimedatempowermentofdisabilitybenefitclaimants
AT kowalczykwojtek processevaluationofawebbasedinterventionaimedatempowermentofdisabilitybenefitclaimants
AT vanderbeekallardj processevaluationofawebbasedinterventionaimedatempowermentofdisabilitybenefitclaimants