Cargando…

Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathology laboratories increasingly use complex instruments that incorporate chromatographic separation, e.g. liquid chromatography, with mass detection for rapid identification and quantification of biochemicals, biomolecules, or pharmaceuticals. Electronic data management for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blank, Gary E., Virji, Mohamed A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.77176
_version_ 1782199221714157568
author Blank, Gary E.
Virji, Mohamed A.
author_facet Blank, Gary E.
Virji, Mohamed A.
author_sort Blank, Gary E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical pathology laboratories increasingly use complex instruments that incorporate chromatographic separation, e.g. liquid chromatography, with mass detection for rapid identification and quantification of biochemicals, biomolecules, or pharmaceuticals. Electronic data management for these instruments through interfaces with laboratory information systems (LIS) is not generally available from the instrument manufacturers or LIS vendors. Unavailability of a data management interface is a limiting factor in the use of these instruments in clinical laboratories where there is a demand for high-throughput assays with turn-around times that meet patient care needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Professional society guidelines for design and transfer of data between instruments and LIS were used in the development and implementation of the interface. File transfer protocols and support utilities were written to facilitate transfer of information between the instruments and the LIS. An interface was created for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy instruments to manage data in the Sunquest(®) LIS. RESULTS: Interface validation, implementation and data transfer fidelity as well as training of technologists for use of the interface was performed by the LIS group. The technologists were familiarized with the data verification process as a part of the data management protocol. The total time for the technologists for patient/control sample data entry, assay results data transfer, and results verification was reduced from approximately 20 s per sample to <1 s per sample. Sample identification, results data entry errors, and omissions were eliminated. There was electronic record of the technologist performing the assay runs and data management. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a data management interface for complex, chromatography instruments in clinical laboratories has resulted in rapid, accurate, verifiable information transfers between instruments and LIS. This has eliminated manual data entry that is prone to errors and enabled technologists to focus on analytical applications on the instruments.
format Text
id pubmed-3049252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30492522011-03-07 Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface Blank, Gary E. Virji, Mohamed A. J Pathol Inform Original Article BACKGROUND: Clinical pathology laboratories increasingly use complex instruments that incorporate chromatographic separation, e.g. liquid chromatography, with mass detection for rapid identification and quantification of biochemicals, biomolecules, or pharmaceuticals. Electronic data management for these instruments through interfaces with laboratory information systems (LIS) is not generally available from the instrument manufacturers or LIS vendors. Unavailability of a data management interface is a limiting factor in the use of these instruments in clinical laboratories where there is a demand for high-throughput assays with turn-around times that meet patient care needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Professional society guidelines for design and transfer of data between instruments and LIS were used in the development and implementation of the interface. File transfer protocols and support utilities were written to facilitate transfer of information between the instruments and the LIS. An interface was created for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy instruments to manage data in the Sunquest(®) LIS. RESULTS: Interface validation, implementation and data transfer fidelity as well as training of technologists for use of the interface was performed by the LIS group. The technologists were familiarized with the data verification process as a part of the data management protocol. The total time for the technologists for patient/control sample data entry, assay results data transfer, and results verification was reduced from approximately 20 s per sample to <1 s per sample. Sample identification, results data entry errors, and omissions were eliminated. There was electronic record of the technologist performing the assay runs and data management. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a data management interface for complex, chromatography instruments in clinical laboratories has resulted in rapid, accurate, verifiable information transfers between instruments and LIS. This has eliminated manual data entry that is prone to errors and enabled technologists to focus on analytical applications on the instruments. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3049252/ /pubmed/21383937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.77176 Text en © 2011 Blank GE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Blank, Gary E.
Virji, Mohamed A.
Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
title Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
title_full Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
title_fullStr Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
title_full_unstemmed Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
title_short Development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
title_sort development and implementation of an electronic interface for complex clinical laboratory instruments without a vendor-provided data transfer interface
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21383937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.77176
work_keys_str_mv AT blankgarye developmentandimplementationofanelectronicinterfaceforcomplexclinicallaboratoryinstrumentswithoutavendorprovideddatatransferinterface
AT virjimohameda developmentandimplementationofanelectronicinterfaceforcomplexclinicallaboratoryinstrumentswithoutavendorprovideddatatransferinterface