Cargando…

Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Although it is accepted that metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) that carry activating mutations in KRAS are unresponsive to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, a significant fraction of KRAS wild-type (wt) mCRCs are also unresponsive to anti-EGFR therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, J B, Dutta, D, Watson, D, Maddala, T, Munneke, B M, Shak, S, Rowinsky, E K, Xu, L-A, Harbison, C T, Clark, E A, Mauro, D J, Khambata-Ford, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606054
_version_ 1782199238099206144
author Baker, J B
Dutta, D
Watson, D
Maddala, T
Munneke, B M
Shak, S
Rowinsky, E K
Xu, L-A
Harbison, C T
Clark, E A
Mauro, D J
Khambata-Ford, S
author_facet Baker, J B
Dutta, D
Watson, D
Maddala, T
Munneke, B M
Shak, S
Rowinsky, E K
Xu, L-A
Harbison, C T
Clark, E A
Mauro, D J
Khambata-Ford, S
author_sort Baker, J B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although it is accepted that metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) that carry activating mutations in KRAS are unresponsive to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, a significant fraction of KRAS wild-type (wt) mCRCs are also unresponsive to anti-EGFR therapy. Genes encoding EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are promising gene expression-based markers but have not been incorporated into a test to dichotomise KRAS wt mCRC patients with respect to sensitivity to anti-EGFR treatment. METHODS: We used RT–PCR to test 110 candidate gene expression markers in primary tumours from 144 KRAS wt mCRC patients who received monotherapy with the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. Results were correlated with multiple clinical endpoints: disease control, objective response, and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Expression of many of the tested candidate genes, including EREG and AREG, strongly associate with all clinical endpoints. Using multivariate analysis with two-layer five-fold cross-validation, we constructed a four-gene predictive classifier. Strikingly, patients below the classifier cutpoint had PFS and disease control rates similar to those of patients with KRAS mutant mCRC. CONCLUSION: Gene expression appears to identify KRAS wt mCRC patients who receive little benefit from cetuximab. It will be important to test this model in an independent validation study.
format Text
id pubmed-3049558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30495582011-03-15 Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer Baker, J B Dutta, D Watson, D Maddala, T Munneke, B M Shak, S Rowinsky, E K Xu, L-A Harbison, C T Clark, E A Mauro, D J Khambata-Ford, S Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Although it is accepted that metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) that carry activating mutations in KRAS are unresponsive to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, a significant fraction of KRAS wild-type (wt) mCRCs are also unresponsive to anti-EGFR therapy. Genes encoding EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are promising gene expression-based markers but have not been incorporated into a test to dichotomise KRAS wt mCRC patients with respect to sensitivity to anti-EGFR treatment. METHODS: We used RT–PCR to test 110 candidate gene expression markers in primary tumours from 144 KRAS wt mCRC patients who received monotherapy with the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. Results were correlated with multiple clinical endpoints: disease control, objective response, and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Expression of many of the tested candidate genes, including EREG and AREG, strongly associate with all clinical endpoints. Using multivariate analysis with two-layer five-fold cross-validation, we constructed a four-gene predictive classifier. Strikingly, patients below the classifier cutpoint had PFS and disease control rates similar to those of patients with KRAS mutant mCRC. CONCLUSION: Gene expression appears to identify KRAS wt mCRC patients who receive little benefit from cetuximab. It will be important to test this model in an independent validation study. Nature Publishing Group 2011-02-01 2011-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3049558/ /pubmed/21206494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606054 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Baker, J B
Dutta, D
Watson, D
Maddala, T
Munneke, B M
Shak, S
Rowinsky, E K
Xu, L-A
Harbison, C T
Clark, E A
Mauro, D J
Khambata-Ford, S
Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
title Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort tumour gene expression predicts response to cetuximab in patients with kras wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606054
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerjb tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT duttad tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT watsond tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT maddalat tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT munnekebm tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT shaks tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT rowinskyek tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT xula tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT harbisonct tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT clarkea tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT maurodj tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT khambatafords tumourgeneexpressionpredictsresponsetocetuximabinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancer