Cargando…
Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
PURPOSE: Treatment efficacy and toxicity are difficult to predict in lymphoma patients. In this study, the utility of circulating biomarkers in predicting and/or monitoring treatment efficacy/toxicity were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Circulating biomarkers of cell death (nucleosomal DNA (nDN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606082 |
_version_ | 1782199245577650176 |
---|---|
author | Greystoke, A O'Connor, J P B Linton, K Taylor, M B Cummings, J Ward, T Maders, F Hughes, A Ranson, M Illidge, T M Radford, J Dive, C |
author_facet | Greystoke, A O'Connor, J P B Linton, K Taylor, M B Cummings, J Ward, T Maders, F Hughes, A Ranson, M Illidge, T M Radford, J Dive, C |
author_sort | Greystoke, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Treatment efficacy and toxicity are difficult to predict in lymphoma patients. In this study, the utility of circulating biomarkers in predicting and/or monitoring treatment efficacy/toxicity were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Circulating biomarkers of cell death (nucleosomal DNA (nDNA) and cytokeratin 18 (CK18)), and circulating FLT3 ligand, a potential biomarker of myelosuppression, were assessed before and serially after standard chemotherapy in 49 patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytokeratin 18 is not expressed in lymphoma cells so is a potential biomarker of epithelial toxicity in this setting. Tumour response was assessed before and after completion of chemotherapy by 2D and 3D computed tomography radiological response. RESULTS: Baseline nDNA level was significantly higher in all lymphoma subtypes compared with 61 healthy controls and was prognostic for progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Decreases in nDNA levels were observed in the first week after chemotherapy; in FL, early falls in nDNA predicted for long remission following therapy. In DLBCL, elevations in nDNA occurred in cases with progressive disease. Circulating CK18 increased within 48 h of chemotherapy and was significantly higher in patients experiencing epithelial toxicity graded >3 by Common Terminology for Classification of Adverse Events criteria. FLT3 ligand was elevated within 3–8 days of chemotherapy initiation and predicted those patients who subsequently developed neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest circulating biomarkers contribute useful information regarding tumour response and toxicity in patients receiving standard chemotherapy and have potential utility in the development of individualised treatment approaches in lymphoma. These biomarkers are now being tested within multicentre phase III trials to progress their qualification. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3049589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30495892012-02-15 Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma Greystoke, A O'Connor, J P B Linton, K Taylor, M B Cummings, J Ward, T Maders, F Hughes, A Ranson, M Illidge, T M Radford, J Dive, C Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics PURPOSE: Treatment efficacy and toxicity are difficult to predict in lymphoma patients. In this study, the utility of circulating biomarkers in predicting and/or monitoring treatment efficacy/toxicity were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Circulating biomarkers of cell death (nucleosomal DNA (nDNA) and cytokeratin 18 (CK18)), and circulating FLT3 ligand, a potential biomarker of myelosuppression, were assessed before and serially after standard chemotherapy in 49 patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytokeratin 18 is not expressed in lymphoma cells so is a potential biomarker of epithelial toxicity in this setting. Tumour response was assessed before and after completion of chemotherapy by 2D and 3D computed tomography radiological response. RESULTS: Baseline nDNA level was significantly higher in all lymphoma subtypes compared with 61 healthy controls and was prognostic for progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Decreases in nDNA levels were observed in the first week after chemotherapy; in FL, early falls in nDNA predicted for long remission following therapy. In DLBCL, elevations in nDNA occurred in cases with progressive disease. Circulating CK18 increased within 48 h of chemotherapy and was significantly higher in patients experiencing epithelial toxicity graded >3 by Common Terminology for Classification of Adverse Events criteria. FLT3 ligand was elevated within 3–8 days of chemotherapy initiation and predicted those patients who subsequently developed neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest circulating biomarkers contribute useful information regarding tumour response and toxicity in patients receiving standard chemotherapy and have potential utility in the development of individualised treatment approaches in lymphoma. These biomarkers are now being tested within multicentre phase III trials to progress their qualification. Nature Publishing Group 2011-02-15 2011-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3049589/ /pubmed/21245866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606082 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics Greystoke, A O'Connor, J P B Linton, K Taylor, M B Cummings, J Ward, T Maders, F Hughes, A Ranson, M Illidge, T M Radford, J Dive, C Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
title | Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
title_full | Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
title_short | Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
title_sort | assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greystokea assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT oconnorjpb assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT lintonk assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT taylormb assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT cummingsj assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT wardt assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT madersf assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT hughesa assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT ransonm assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT illidgetm assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT radfordj assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma AT divec assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma |