Cargando…

Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma

PURPOSE: Treatment efficacy and toxicity are difficult to predict in lymphoma patients. In this study, the utility of circulating biomarkers in predicting and/or monitoring treatment efficacy/toxicity were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Circulating biomarkers of cell death (nucleosomal DNA (nDN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greystoke, A, O'Connor, J P B, Linton, K, Taylor, M B, Cummings, J, Ward, T, Maders, F, Hughes, A, Ranson, M, Illidge, T M, Radford, J, Dive, C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606082
_version_ 1782199245577650176
author Greystoke, A
O'Connor, J P B
Linton, K
Taylor, M B
Cummings, J
Ward, T
Maders, F
Hughes, A
Ranson, M
Illidge, T M
Radford, J
Dive, C
author_facet Greystoke, A
O'Connor, J P B
Linton, K
Taylor, M B
Cummings, J
Ward, T
Maders, F
Hughes, A
Ranson, M
Illidge, T M
Radford, J
Dive, C
author_sort Greystoke, A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment efficacy and toxicity are difficult to predict in lymphoma patients. In this study, the utility of circulating biomarkers in predicting and/or monitoring treatment efficacy/toxicity were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Circulating biomarkers of cell death (nucleosomal DNA (nDNA) and cytokeratin 18 (CK18)), and circulating FLT3 ligand, a potential biomarker of myelosuppression, were assessed before and serially after standard chemotherapy in 49 patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytokeratin 18 is not expressed in lymphoma cells so is a potential biomarker of epithelial toxicity in this setting. Tumour response was assessed before and after completion of chemotherapy by 2D and 3D computed tomography radiological response. RESULTS: Baseline nDNA level was significantly higher in all lymphoma subtypes compared with 61 healthy controls and was prognostic for progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Decreases in nDNA levels were observed in the first week after chemotherapy; in FL, early falls in nDNA predicted for long remission following therapy. In DLBCL, elevations in nDNA occurred in cases with progressive disease. Circulating CK18 increased within 48 h of chemotherapy and was significantly higher in patients experiencing epithelial toxicity graded >3 by Common Terminology for Classification of Adverse Events criteria. FLT3 ligand was elevated within 3–8 days of chemotherapy initiation and predicted those patients who subsequently developed neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest circulating biomarkers contribute useful information regarding tumour response and toxicity in patients receiving standard chemotherapy and have potential utility in the development of individualised treatment approaches in lymphoma. These biomarkers are now being tested within multicentre phase III trials to progress their qualification.
format Text
id pubmed-3049589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30495892012-02-15 Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma Greystoke, A O'Connor, J P B Linton, K Taylor, M B Cummings, J Ward, T Maders, F Hughes, A Ranson, M Illidge, T M Radford, J Dive, C Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics PURPOSE: Treatment efficacy and toxicity are difficult to predict in lymphoma patients. In this study, the utility of circulating biomarkers in predicting and/or monitoring treatment efficacy/toxicity were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Circulating biomarkers of cell death (nucleosomal DNA (nDNA) and cytokeratin 18 (CK18)), and circulating FLT3 ligand, a potential biomarker of myelosuppression, were assessed before and serially after standard chemotherapy in 49 patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytokeratin 18 is not expressed in lymphoma cells so is a potential biomarker of epithelial toxicity in this setting. Tumour response was assessed before and after completion of chemotherapy by 2D and 3D computed tomography radiological response. RESULTS: Baseline nDNA level was significantly higher in all lymphoma subtypes compared with 61 healthy controls and was prognostic for progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Decreases in nDNA levels were observed in the first week after chemotherapy; in FL, early falls in nDNA predicted for long remission following therapy. In DLBCL, elevations in nDNA occurred in cases with progressive disease. Circulating CK18 increased within 48 h of chemotherapy and was significantly higher in patients experiencing epithelial toxicity graded >3 by Common Terminology for Classification of Adverse Events criteria. FLT3 ligand was elevated within 3–8 days of chemotherapy initiation and predicted those patients who subsequently developed neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest circulating biomarkers contribute useful information regarding tumour response and toxicity in patients receiving standard chemotherapy and have potential utility in the development of individualised treatment approaches in lymphoma. These biomarkers are now being tested within multicentre phase III trials to progress their qualification. Nature Publishing Group 2011-02-15 2011-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3049589/ /pubmed/21245866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606082 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Greystoke, A
O'Connor, J P B
Linton, K
Taylor, M B
Cummings, J
Ward, T
Maders, F
Hughes, A
Ranson, M
Illidge, T M
Radford, J
Dive, C
Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
title Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
title_full Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
title_fullStr Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
title_short Assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
title_sort assessment of circulating biomarkers for potential pharmacodynamic utility in patients with lymphoma
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606082
work_keys_str_mv AT greystokea assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT oconnorjpb assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT lintonk assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT taylormb assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT cummingsj assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT wardt assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT madersf assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT hughesa assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT ransonm assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT illidgetm assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT radfordj assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma
AT divec assessmentofcirculatingbiomarkersforpotentialpharmacodynamicutilityinpatientswithlymphoma