Cargando…
Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study
BACKGROUND: As part of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Screening (MARIBS), Study women with a family history of breast cancer were assessed psychologically to determine the relative psychological impact and acceptability of annual screening using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conven...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21326245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.1 |
_version_ | 1782199247523807232 |
---|---|
author | Hutton, J Walker, L G Gilbert, F J Evans, D G Eeles, R Kwan-Lim, G E Thompson, D Pointon, L J Sharp, D M Leach, M O |
author_facet | Hutton, J Walker, L G Gilbert, F J Evans, D G Eeles, R Kwan-Lim, G E Thompson, D Pointon, L J Sharp, D M Leach, M O |
author_sort | Hutton, J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As part of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Screening (MARIBS), Study women with a family history of breast cancer were assessed psychologically to determine the relative psychological impact and acceptability of annual screening using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional X-ray mammography (XRM). METHODS: Women were assessed psychologically at baseline (4 weeks before MRI and XRM), immediately before, and immediately after, both MRI and XRM, and at follow-up (6 weeks after the scans). RESULTS: Overall, both procedures were found to be acceptable with high levels of satisfaction (MRI, 96.3% and XRM, 97.7% NS) and low levels of psychological morbidity throughout, particularly at 6-week follow-up. Low levels of self-reported distress were reported for both procedures (MRI, 13.5% and XRM, 7.8%), although MRI was more distressing (P=0.005). Similarly, higher anticipatory anxiety was reported before MRI than before XRM (P=0.003). Relative to XRM, MRI-related distress was more likely to persist at 6 weeks after the scans in the form of intrusive MRI-related thoughts (P=0.006) and total MRI-related distress (P=0.014). More women stated that they intended to return for XRM (96.3%) than for MRI (88% P<0.0005). These effects were most marked for the first year of screening, although they were also statistically significant in subsequent years. CONCLUSION: Given the proven benefits of MRI in screening for breast cancer in this population, these data point to the urgent need to provide timely information and support to women undergoing MRI. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3049597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30495972012-02-15 Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study Hutton, J Walker, L G Gilbert, F J Evans, D G Eeles, R Kwan-Lim, G E Thompson, D Pointon, L J Sharp, D M Leach, M O Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: As part of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Screening (MARIBS), Study women with a family history of breast cancer were assessed psychologically to determine the relative psychological impact and acceptability of annual screening using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional X-ray mammography (XRM). METHODS: Women were assessed psychologically at baseline (4 weeks before MRI and XRM), immediately before, and immediately after, both MRI and XRM, and at follow-up (6 weeks after the scans). RESULTS: Overall, both procedures were found to be acceptable with high levels of satisfaction (MRI, 96.3% and XRM, 97.7% NS) and low levels of psychological morbidity throughout, particularly at 6-week follow-up. Low levels of self-reported distress were reported for both procedures (MRI, 13.5% and XRM, 7.8%), although MRI was more distressing (P=0.005). Similarly, higher anticipatory anxiety was reported before MRI than before XRM (P=0.003). Relative to XRM, MRI-related distress was more likely to persist at 6 weeks after the scans in the form of intrusive MRI-related thoughts (P=0.006) and total MRI-related distress (P=0.014). More women stated that they intended to return for XRM (96.3%) than for MRI (88% P<0.0005). These effects were most marked for the first year of screening, although they were also statistically significant in subsequent years. CONCLUSION: Given the proven benefits of MRI in screening for breast cancer in this population, these data point to the urgent need to provide timely information and support to women undergoing MRI. Nature Publishing Group 2011-02-15 2011-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3049597/ /pubmed/21326245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.1 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Hutton, J Walker, L G Gilbert, F J Evans, D G Eeles, R Kwan-Lim, G E Thompson, D Pointon, L J Sharp, D M Leach, M O Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study |
title | Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study |
title_full | Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study |
title_fullStr | Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study |
title_short | Psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography: the MARIBS Study |
title_sort | psychological impact and acceptability of magnetic resonance imaging and x-ray mammography: the maribs study |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3049597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21326245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huttonj psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT walkerlg psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT gilbertfj psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT evansdg psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT eelesr psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT kwanlimge psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT thompsond psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT pointonlj psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT sharpdm psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy AT leachmo psychologicalimpactandacceptabilityofmagneticresonanceimagingandxraymammographythemaribsstudy |