Cargando…

Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis

Objective To compare the volume and quality of original research in primary care published by researchers from primary care in the United Kingdom against five countries with well established academic primary care. Design Bibliometric analysis. Setting United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glanville, Julie, Kendrick, Tony, McNally, Rosalind, Campbell, John, Hobbs, FD Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21385804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1028
_version_ 1782199362650112000
author Glanville, Julie
Kendrick, Tony
McNally, Rosalind
Campbell, John
Hobbs, FD Richard
author_facet Glanville, Julie
Kendrick, Tony
McNally, Rosalind
Campbell, John
Hobbs, FD Richard
author_sort Glanville, Julie
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare the volume and quality of original research in primary care published by researchers from primary care in the United Kingdom against five countries with well established academic primary care. Design Bibliometric analysis. Setting United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands. Studies reviewed Research publications relevant to comprehensive primary care and authored by researchers from primary care, recorded in Medline and Embase, with publication dates 2001-7 inclusive. Main outcome measures Volume of published activity of generalist primary care researchers and the quality of the research output by those publishing the most using citation metrics: numbers of cited papers, proportion of cited papers, and mean citation scores. Results 82 169 papers published between 2001 and 2007 in the six countries were classified as research on primary care. In a 15% pragmatic random sample of these records, 40% of research on primary care from the United Kingdom and 46% from the Netherlands was authored by researchers employed in a primary care setting or employed in academic departments of primary care. The 141 researchers with the highest volume of publications reporting research findings published between 2001 and 2007 (inclusive) authored or part authored 8.3% of the total sample of papers. For authors with the highest proportion of publications cited at least five times, the best performers came from the United States (n=5), United Kingdom (n=4), and the Netherlands (n=2). In the top 10 of authors with the highest proportions of publications achieving 20 or more citations, six were from the United Kingdom and four from the United States. The mean Hirsch index (measure of a researcher’s productivity and impact of the published work) was 14 for the Netherlands, 13 for the United Kingdom, 12 for the United States, 7 for Canada, 4 for Australia, and 3 for Germany. Conclusion This international comparison of the volume and citation rates of papers by researchers from primary care consistently placed UK researchers among the best performers internationally.
format Text
id pubmed-3050436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30504362011-03-22 Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis Glanville, Julie Kendrick, Tony McNally, Rosalind Campbell, John Hobbs, FD Richard BMJ Research Objective To compare the volume and quality of original research in primary care published by researchers from primary care in the United Kingdom against five countries with well established academic primary care. Design Bibliometric analysis. Setting United Kingdom, United States, Australia, Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands. Studies reviewed Research publications relevant to comprehensive primary care and authored by researchers from primary care, recorded in Medline and Embase, with publication dates 2001-7 inclusive. Main outcome measures Volume of published activity of generalist primary care researchers and the quality of the research output by those publishing the most using citation metrics: numbers of cited papers, proportion of cited papers, and mean citation scores. Results 82 169 papers published between 2001 and 2007 in the six countries were classified as research on primary care. In a 15% pragmatic random sample of these records, 40% of research on primary care from the United Kingdom and 46% from the Netherlands was authored by researchers employed in a primary care setting or employed in academic departments of primary care. The 141 researchers with the highest volume of publications reporting research findings published between 2001 and 2007 (inclusive) authored or part authored 8.3% of the total sample of papers. For authors with the highest proportion of publications cited at least five times, the best performers came from the United States (n=5), United Kingdom (n=4), and the Netherlands (n=2). In the top 10 of authors with the highest proportions of publications achieving 20 or more citations, six were from the United Kingdom and four from the United States. The mean Hirsch index (measure of a researcher’s productivity and impact of the published work) was 14 for the Netherlands, 13 for the United Kingdom, 12 for the United States, 7 for Canada, 4 for Australia, and 3 for Germany. Conclusion This international comparison of the volume and citation rates of papers by researchers from primary care consistently placed UK researchers among the best performers internationally. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3050436/ /pubmed/21385804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1028 Text en © Glanville et al 2011 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Glanville, Julie
Kendrick, Tony
McNally, Rosalind
Campbell, John
Hobbs, FD Richard
Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
title Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
title_full Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
title_short Research output on primary care in Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States: bibliometric analysis
title_sort research output on primary care in australia, canada, germany, the netherlands, the united kingdom, and the united states: bibliometric analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21385804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1028
work_keys_str_mv AT glanvillejulie researchoutputonprimarycareinaustraliacanadagermanythenetherlandstheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesbibliometricanalysis
AT kendricktony researchoutputonprimarycareinaustraliacanadagermanythenetherlandstheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesbibliometricanalysis
AT mcnallyrosalind researchoutputonprimarycareinaustraliacanadagermanythenetherlandstheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesbibliometricanalysis
AT campbelljohn researchoutputonprimarycareinaustraliacanadagermanythenetherlandstheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesbibliometricanalysis
AT hobbsfdrichard researchoutputonprimarycareinaustraliacanadagermanythenetherlandstheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesbibliometricanalysis