Cargando…
The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
BACKGROUND: Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-7 |
_version_ | 1782199368802107392 |
---|---|
author | Bakr, Wafaa MK El Attar, Laila A Ashour, Medhat S El Toukhy, Ayman M |
author_facet | Bakr, Wafaa MK El Attar, Laila A Ashour, Medhat S El Toukhy, Ayman M |
author_sort | Bakr, Wafaa MK |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why the aim of this study was to: (i) Compare the diagnostic accuracy of four different commercial kits used to perform Widal test (Remel, BioSystems, Dialab and Biotec). (ii) Compare the sensitivity and specificity of both anti-O and anti-H antibodies. (iii) Compare the validity of single versus paired serum samples with a rising titer for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. METHODS: Duplicate serum samples were obtained from150 patients clinically diagnosed as typhoid fever patients. Moreover, single serum samples were obtained from 25 patients with febrile diseases other than typhoid fever. All samples were tested using the four different Widal brands and Salmonella Typhi IgM anti-LPS ELISA RESULTS: -The results of Widal tests differed markedly using the four Widal brands in terms of sensitivity and specificity at three cut-off values of 1/80, 1/160 and 1/320. Remel brand gave the highest sensitivities and the lowest specificities and Dialab brand gave the highest specificities and the lowest sensitivities for both anti-O and anti-H antibodies at the three cut-off values. -Four fold rise in the antibodies titer was not demonstrable among clinically diagnosed typhoid fever patients -H agglutinins were less sensitive and less specific than O agglutinins CONCLUSIONS: -Widal test results showed marked discrepancies using different Widal brands. None of the serum samples of the typhoid fever patients showed four fold rise in the antibody titers. Raised O agglutinins were of slightly greater diagnostic value than raised H agglutinins. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Widal test done sequentially using two brands could be of value in typhoid fever diagnosis. Single serum sample could be used for typhoid fever diagnosis relying on anti O titer. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3050682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30506822011-03-09 The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study Bakr, Wafaa MK El Attar, Laila A Ashour, Medhat S El Toukhy, Ayman M Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why the aim of this study was to: (i) Compare the diagnostic accuracy of four different commercial kits used to perform Widal test (Remel, BioSystems, Dialab and Biotec). (ii) Compare the sensitivity and specificity of both anti-O and anti-H antibodies. (iii) Compare the validity of single versus paired serum samples with a rising titer for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. METHODS: Duplicate serum samples were obtained from150 patients clinically diagnosed as typhoid fever patients. Moreover, single serum samples were obtained from 25 patients with febrile diseases other than typhoid fever. All samples were tested using the four different Widal brands and Salmonella Typhi IgM anti-LPS ELISA RESULTS: -The results of Widal tests differed markedly using the four Widal brands in terms of sensitivity and specificity at three cut-off values of 1/80, 1/160 and 1/320. Remel brand gave the highest sensitivities and the lowest specificities and Dialab brand gave the highest specificities and the lowest sensitivities for both anti-O and anti-H antibodies at the three cut-off values. -Four fold rise in the antibodies titer was not demonstrable among clinically diagnosed typhoid fever patients -H agglutinins were less sensitive and less specific than O agglutinins CONCLUSIONS: -Widal test results showed marked discrepancies using different Widal brands. None of the serum samples of the typhoid fever patients showed four fold rise in the antibody titers. Raised O agglutinins were of slightly greater diagnostic value than raised H agglutinins. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Widal test done sequentially using two brands could be of value in typhoid fever diagnosis. Single serum sample could be used for typhoid fever diagnosis relying on anti O titer. BioMed Central 2011-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3050682/ /pubmed/21303511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bakr et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bakr, Wafaa MK El Attar, Laila A Ashour, Medhat S El Toukhy, Ayman M The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
title | The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
title_full | The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
title_fullStr | The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
title_short | The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
title_sort | dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakrwafaamk thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT elattarlailaa thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT ashourmedhats thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT eltoukhyaymanm thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT bakrwafaamk dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT elattarlailaa dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT ashourmedhats dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy AT eltoukhyaymanm dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy |