Cargando…

The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study

BACKGROUND: Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakr, Wafaa MK, El Attar, Laila A, Ashour, Medhat S, El Toukhy, Ayman M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-7
_version_ 1782199368802107392
author Bakr, Wafaa MK
El Attar, Laila A
Ashour, Medhat S
El Toukhy, Ayman M
author_facet Bakr, Wafaa MK
El Attar, Laila A
Ashour, Medhat S
El Toukhy, Ayman M
author_sort Bakr, Wafaa MK
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why the aim of this study was to: (i) Compare the diagnostic accuracy of four different commercial kits used to perform Widal test (Remel, BioSystems, Dialab and Biotec). (ii) Compare the sensitivity and specificity of both anti-O and anti-H antibodies. (iii) Compare the validity of single versus paired serum samples with a rising titer for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. METHODS: Duplicate serum samples were obtained from150 patients clinically diagnosed as typhoid fever patients. Moreover, single serum samples were obtained from 25 patients with febrile diseases other than typhoid fever. All samples were tested using the four different Widal brands and Salmonella Typhi IgM anti-LPS ELISA RESULTS: -The results of Widal tests differed markedly using the four Widal brands in terms of sensitivity and specificity at three cut-off values of 1/80, 1/160 and 1/320. Remel brand gave the highest sensitivities and the lowest specificities and Dialab brand gave the highest specificities and the lowest sensitivities for both anti-O and anti-H antibodies at the three cut-off values. -Four fold rise in the antibodies titer was not demonstrable among clinically diagnosed typhoid fever patients -H agglutinins were less sensitive and less specific than O agglutinins CONCLUSIONS: -Widal test results showed marked discrepancies using different Widal brands. None of the serum samples of the typhoid fever patients showed four fold rise in the antibody titers. Raised O agglutinins were of slightly greater diagnostic value than raised H agglutinins. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Widal test done sequentially using two brands could be of value in typhoid fever diagnosis. Single serum sample could be used for typhoid fever diagnosis relying on anti O titer.
format Text
id pubmed-3050682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30506822011-03-09 The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study Bakr, Wafaa MK El Attar, Laila A Ashour, Medhat S El Toukhy, Ayman M Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research BACKGROUND: Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why the aim of this study was to: (i) Compare the diagnostic accuracy of four different commercial kits used to perform Widal test (Remel, BioSystems, Dialab and Biotec). (ii) Compare the sensitivity and specificity of both anti-O and anti-H antibodies. (iii) Compare the validity of single versus paired serum samples with a rising titer for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. METHODS: Duplicate serum samples were obtained from150 patients clinically diagnosed as typhoid fever patients. Moreover, single serum samples were obtained from 25 patients with febrile diseases other than typhoid fever. All samples were tested using the four different Widal brands and Salmonella Typhi IgM anti-LPS ELISA RESULTS: -The results of Widal tests differed markedly using the four Widal brands in terms of sensitivity and specificity at three cut-off values of 1/80, 1/160 and 1/320. Remel brand gave the highest sensitivities and the lowest specificities and Dialab brand gave the highest specificities and the lowest sensitivities for both anti-O and anti-H antibodies at the three cut-off values. -Four fold rise in the antibodies titer was not demonstrable among clinically diagnosed typhoid fever patients -H agglutinins were less sensitive and less specific than O agglutinins CONCLUSIONS: -Widal test results showed marked discrepancies using different Widal brands. None of the serum samples of the typhoid fever patients showed four fold rise in the antibody titers. Raised O agglutinins were of slightly greater diagnostic value than raised H agglutinins. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Widal test done sequentially using two brands could be of value in typhoid fever diagnosis. Single serum sample could be used for typhoid fever diagnosis relying on anti O titer. BioMed Central 2011-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3050682/ /pubmed/21303511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Bakr et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bakr, Wafaa MK
El Attar, Laila A
Ashour, Medhat S
El Toukhy, Ayman M
The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
title The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
title_full The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
title_fullStr The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
title_full_unstemmed The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
title_short The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
title_sort dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bakrwafaamk thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT elattarlailaa thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT ashourmedhats thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT eltoukhyaymanm thedilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT bakrwafaamk dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT elattarlailaa dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT ashourmedhats dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy
AT eltoukhyaymanm dilemmaofwidaltestwhichbrandtouseastudyoffourdifferentwidalbrandsacrosssectionalcomparativestudy