Cargando…

Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: RNA quality and quantity are important factors for ensuring the accuracy of gene expression analysis and other RNA-based downstream applications. Extraction of high quality nucleic acids is difficult from neuronal cells and brain tissues as they are particularly rich in lipids. In additi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavares, Lucélia, Alves, Paula M, Ferreira, Ricardo B, Santos, Claudia N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21211020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-3
_version_ 1782199373077151744
author Tavares, Lucélia
Alves, Paula M
Ferreira, Ricardo B
Santos, Claudia N
author_facet Tavares, Lucélia
Alves, Paula M
Ferreira, Ricardo B
Santos, Claudia N
author_sort Tavares, Lucélia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RNA quality and quantity are important factors for ensuring the accuracy of gene expression analysis and other RNA-based downstream applications. Extraction of high quality nucleic acids is difficult from neuronal cells and brain tissues as they are particularly rich in lipids. In addition, most common RNA extraction methods are phenol-based, resulting in RNA that may be incompatible with downstream applications such as gene expression. FINDINGS: In this work, a comparative analysis of the RNA quality obtained from SK-N-MC cells was performed using six commonly used RNA isolation kits: two phenol-based kits and four non-phenol based kits. The non-phenol based kits tested AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep, RNeasy(® )Mini, EasySpin and Ilustra RNAspin Mini RNA Isolation, all performed well and resulted in the isolation of high quality RNA, as evaluated by A(260)/A(280). The RNA extracted with AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep, RNeasy(® )Mini and EasySpin provided the highest RNA yields. In particular, the RNA isolated by AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep Kit did not show any detectable genomic DNA contamination even without previous DNase treatment or after RNA direct PCR amplification using universal 18S primers. CONCLUSIONS: The RNA extracted from SK-N-MC cells with AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep Kit was superior with respect to the RNA quality and concentration. This kit does not use aggressive organic solvents and RNA free of genomic DNA was isolated without the need for DNase treatment.
format Text
id pubmed-3050700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30507002011-03-09 Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma Tavares, Lucélia Alves, Paula M Ferreira, Ricardo B Santos, Claudia N BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: RNA quality and quantity are important factors for ensuring the accuracy of gene expression analysis and other RNA-based downstream applications. Extraction of high quality nucleic acids is difficult from neuronal cells and brain tissues as they are particularly rich in lipids. In addition, most common RNA extraction methods are phenol-based, resulting in RNA that may be incompatible with downstream applications such as gene expression. FINDINGS: In this work, a comparative analysis of the RNA quality obtained from SK-N-MC cells was performed using six commonly used RNA isolation kits: two phenol-based kits and four non-phenol based kits. The non-phenol based kits tested AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep, RNeasy(® )Mini, EasySpin and Ilustra RNAspin Mini RNA Isolation, all performed well and resulted in the isolation of high quality RNA, as evaluated by A(260)/A(280). The RNA extracted with AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep, RNeasy(® )Mini and EasySpin provided the highest RNA yields. In particular, the RNA isolated by AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep Kit did not show any detectable genomic DNA contamination even without previous DNase treatment or after RNA direct PCR amplification using universal 18S primers. CONCLUSIONS: The RNA extracted from SK-N-MC cells with AxyPrep Multisource Total RNA Miniprep Kit was superior with respect to the RNA quality and concentration. This kit does not use aggressive organic solvents and RNA free of genomic DNA was isolated without the need for DNase treatment. BioMed Central 2011-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3050700/ /pubmed/21211020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-3 Text en Copyright ©2011 Santos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Technical Note
Tavares, Lucélia
Alves, Paula M
Ferreira, Ricardo B
Santos, Claudia N
Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma
title Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma
title_full Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma
title_short Comparison of different methods for DNA-free RNA isolation from SK-N-MC neuroblastoma
title_sort comparison of different methods for dna-free rna isolation from sk-n-mc neuroblastoma
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21211020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tavareslucelia comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordnafreernaisolationfromsknmcneuroblastoma
AT alvespaulam comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordnafreernaisolationfromsknmcneuroblastoma
AT ferreiraricardob comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordnafreernaisolationfromsknmcneuroblastoma
AT santosclaudian comparisonofdifferentmethodsfordnafreernaisolationfromsknmcneuroblastoma