Cargando…
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat
BACKGROUND: Clinically proven over-the-counter (OTC) treatment options are becoming increasingly important in the self-management of acute sore throat. The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic and sensorial benefits of two different amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol (AMC/DCBA) th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21332976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-6 |
_version_ | 1782199373383335936 |
---|---|
author | Wade, Alan G Morris, Christopher Shephard, Adrian Crawford, Gordon M Goulder, Michael A |
author_facet | Wade, Alan G Morris, Christopher Shephard, Adrian Crawford, Gordon M Goulder, Michael A |
author_sort | Wade, Alan G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinically proven over-the-counter (OTC) treatment options are becoming increasingly important in the self-management of acute sore throat. The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic and sensorial benefits of two different amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol (AMC/DCBA) throat lozenge formulation variants, AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge, compared with an unflavoured, non-medicated placebo lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infections. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study, 225 adult patients with acute sore throat were randomly assigned to receive either one AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge (n = 77), one AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge (n = 74) or one unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge (matched for size, shape and demulcency; n = 74). After baseline assessments, patients received their assigned lozenge and completed four rating assessments at 11 timepoints from 1 to 120 minutes post dose. Analgesic properties were assessed by comparing severity of throat soreness and sore throat relief ratings. Difficulty in swallowing, throat numbness, functional, sensorial and emotional benefits were also assessed. RESULTS: Both the AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge induced significant analgesic, functional, sensorial and emotional effects compared with the unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge. Sore throat relief, improvements in throat soreness and difficulty in swallowing, and throat numbness were observed as early as 1-5 minutes, and lasted up to 2 hours post dose. Sensorial benefits of warming and cooling associated with the AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge, respectively, were experienced soon after first dose, and in the case of the latter, it lasted long after the lozenge had dissolved. Emotional benefits of feeling better, happier, less distracted and less frustrated were reported in those taking either of the AMC/DCBA throat lozenge variants, with no differences in adverse events compared with the unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge. CONCLUSIONS: AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenges are well-tolerated and effective OTC treatment options, offering functional, sensorial and emotional benefits to patients with acute sore throat, over and above that of the rapid efficacy effects provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN00003567 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3050701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30507012011-03-09 A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat Wade, Alan G Morris, Christopher Shephard, Adrian Crawford, Gordon M Goulder, Michael A BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinically proven over-the-counter (OTC) treatment options are becoming increasingly important in the self-management of acute sore throat. The aim of this study was to determine the analgesic and sensorial benefits of two different amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol (AMC/DCBA) throat lozenge formulation variants, AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge, compared with an unflavoured, non-medicated placebo lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat due to upper respiratory tract infections. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study, 225 adult patients with acute sore throat were randomly assigned to receive either one AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge (n = 77), one AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge (n = 74) or one unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge (matched for size, shape and demulcency; n = 74). After baseline assessments, patients received their assigned lozenge and completed four rating assessments at 11 timepoints from 1 to 120 minutes post dose. Analgesic properties were assessed by comparing severity of throat soreness and sore throat relief ratings. Difficulty in swallowing, throat numbness, functional, sensorial and emotional benefits were also assessed. RESULTS: Both the AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge induced significant analgesic, functional, sensorial and emotional effects compared with the unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge. Sore throat relief, improvements in throat soreness and difficulty in swallowing, and throat numbness were observed as early as 1-5 minutes, and lasted up to 2 hours post dose. Sensorial benefits of warming and cooling associated with the AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge, respectively, were experienced soon after first dose, and in the case of the latter, it lasted long after the lozenge had dissolved. Emotional benefits of feeling better, happier, less distracted and less frustrated were reported in those taking either of the AMC/DCBA throat lozenge variants, with no differences in adverse events compared with the unflavoured, non-medicated lozenge. CONCLUSIONS: AMC/DCBA Warm and AMC/DCBA Cool lozenges are well-tolerated and effective OTC treatment options, offering functional, sensorial and emotional benefits to patients with acute sore throat, over and above that of the rapid efficacy effects provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN00003567 BioMed Central 2011-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3050701/ /pubmed/21332976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-6 Text en Copyright ©2011 Wade et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wade, Alan G Morris, Christopher Shephard, Adrian Crawford, Gordon M Goulder, Michael A A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
title | A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
title_full | A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
title_fullStr | A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
title_short | A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of AMC/DCBA Warm lozenge or AMC/DCBA Cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
title_sort | multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose study assessing the efficacy of amc/dcba warm lozenge or amc/dcba cool lozenge in the relief of acute sore throat |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21332976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadealang amulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT morrischristopher amulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT shephardadrian amulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT crawfordgordonm amulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT gouldermichaela amulticentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT wadealang multicentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT morrischristopher multicentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT shephardadrian multicentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT crawfordgordonm multicentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat AT gouldermichaela multicentrerandomiseddoubleblindsingledosestudyassessingtheefficacyofamcdcbawarmlozengeoramcdcbacoollozengeinthereliefofacutesorethroat |