Cargando…
Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic trees are an important tool for representing evolutionary relationships among organisms. In a phylogram or chronogram, the ordering of taxa is not considered meaningful, since complete topological information is given by the branching order and length of the branches, which...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-58 |
_version_ | 1782199378445860864 |
---|---|
author | Cerutti, Francesco Bertolotti, Luigi Goldberg, Tony L Giacobini, Mario |
author_facet | Cerutti, Francesco Bertolotti, Luigi Goldberg, Tony L Giacobini, Mario |
author_sort | Cerutti, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic trees are an important tool for representing evolutionary relationships among organisms. In a phylogram or chronogram, the ordering of taxa is not considered meaningful, since complete topological information is given by the branching order and length of the branches, which are represented in the root-to-node direction. We apply a novel method based on a (λ + μ)-Evolutionary Algorithm to give meaning to the order of taxa in a phylogeny. This method applies random swaps between two taxa connected to the same node, without changing the topology of the tree. The evaluation of a new tree is based on different distance matrices, representing non-phylogenetic information such as other types of genetic distance, geographic distance, or combinations of these. To test our method we use published trees of Vesicular stomatitis virus, West Nile virus and Rice yellow mottle virus. RESULTS: Best results were obtained when taxa were reordered using geographic information. Information supporting phylogeographic analysis was recovered in the optimized tree, as evidenced by clustering of geographically close samples. Improving the trees using a separate genetic distance matrix altered the ordering of taxa, but not topology, moving the longest branches to the extremities, as would be expected since they are the most divergent lineages. Improved representations of genetic and geographic relationships between samples were also obtained when merged matrices (genetic and geographic information in one matrix) were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative method makes phylogenetic trees easier to interpret, adding meaning to the taxon order and helping to prevent misinterpretations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3050728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30507282011-03-09 Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test Cerutti, Francesco Bertolotti, Luigi Goldberg, Tony L Giacobini, Mario BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic trees are an important tool for representing evolutionary relationships among organisms. In a phylogram or chronogram, the ordering of taxa is not considered meaningful, since complete topological information is given by the branching order and length of the branches, which are represented in the root-to-node direction. We apply a novel method based on a (λ + μ)-Evolutionary Algorithm to give meaning to the order of taxa in a phylogeny. This method applies random swaps between two taxa connected to the same node, without changing the topology of the tree. The evaluation of a new tree is based on different distance matrices, representing non-phylogenetic information such as other types of genetic distance, geographic distance, or combinations of these. To test our method we use published trees of Vesicular stomatitis virus, West Nile virus and Rice yellow mottle virus. RESULTS: Best results were obtained when taxa were reordered using geographic information. Information supporting phylogeographic analysis was recovered in the optimized tree, as evidenced by clustering of geographically close samples. Improving the trees using a separate genetic distance matrix altered the ordering of taxa, but not topology, moving the longest branches to the extremities, as would be expected since they are the most divergent lineages. Improved representations of genetic and geographic relationships between samples were also obtained when merged matrices (genetic and geographic information in one matrix) were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative method makes phylogenetic trees easier to interpret, adding meaning to the taxon order and helping to prevent misinterpretations. BioMed Central 2011-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3050728/ /pubmed/21352514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-58 Text en Copyright ©2011 Cerutti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cerutti, Francesco Bertolotti, Luigi Goldberg, Tony L Giacobini, Mario Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
title | Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
title_full | Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
title_fullStr | Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
title_full_unstemmed | Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
title_short | Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
title_sort | taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ceruttifrancesco taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest AT bertolottiluigi taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest AT goldbergtonyl taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest AT giacobinimario taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest |