Cargando…

Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test

BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic trees are an important tool for representing evolutionary relationships among organisms. In a phylogram or chronogram, the ordering of taxa is not considered meaningful, since complete topological information is given by the branching order and length of the branches, which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerutti, Francesco, Bertolotti, Luigi, Goldberg, Tony L, Giacobini, Mario
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-58
_version_ 1782199378445860864
author Cerutti, Francesco
Bertolotti, Luigi
Goldberg, Tony L
Giacobini, Mario
author_facet Cerutti, Francesco
Bertolotti, Luigi
Goldberg, Tony L
Giacobini, Mario
author_sort Cerutti, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic trees are an important tool for representing evolutionary relationships among organisms. In a phylogram or chronogram, the ordering of taxa is not considered meaningful, since complete topological information is given by the branching order and length of the branches, which are represented in the root-to-node direction. We apply a novel method based on a (λ + μ)-Evolutionary Algorithm to give meaning to the order of taxa in a phylogeny. This method applies random swaps between two taxa connected to the same node, without changing the topology of the tree. The evaluation of a new tree is based on different distance matrices, representing non-phylogenetic information such as other types of genetic distance, geographic distance, or combinations of these. To test our method we use published trees of Vesicular stomatitis virus, West Nile virus and Rice yellow mottle virus. RESULTS: Best results were obtained when taxa were reordered using geographic information. Information supporting phylogeographic analysis was recovered in the optimized tree, as evidenced by clustering of geographically close samples. Improving the trees using a separate genetic distance matrix altered the ordering of taxa, but not topology, moving the longest branches to the extremities, as would be expected since they are the most divergent lineages. Improved representations of genetic and geographic relationships between samples were also obtained when merged matrices (genetic and geographic information in one matrix) were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative method makes phylogenetic trees easier to interpret, adding meaning to the taxon order and helping to prevent misinterpretations.
format Text
id pubmed-3050728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30507282011-03-09 Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test Cerutti, Francesco Bertolotti, Luigi Goldberg, Tony L Giacobini, Mario BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: Phylogenetic trees are an important tool for representing evolutionary relationships among organisms. In a phylogram or chronogram, the ordering of taxa is not considered meaningful, since complete topological information is given by the branching order and length of the branches, which are represented in the root-to-node direction. We apply a novel method based on a (λ + μ)-Evolutionary Algorithm to give meaning to the order of taxa in a phylogeny. This method applies random swaps between two taxa connected to the same node, without changing the topology of the tree. The evaluation of a new tree is based on different distance matrices, representing non-phylogenetic information such as other types of genetic distance, geographic distance, or combinations of these. To test our method we use published trees of Vesicular stomatitis virus, West Nile virus and Rice yellow mottle virus. RESULTS: Best results were obtained when taxa were reordered using geographic information. Information supporting phylogeographic analysis was recovered in the optimized tree, as evidenced by clustering of geographically close samples. Improving the trees using a separate genetic distance matrix altered the ordering of taxa, but not topology, moving the longest branches to the extremities, as would be expected since they are the most divergent lineages. Improved representations of genetic and geographic relationships between samples were also obtained when merged matrices (genetic and geographic information in one matrix) were used. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative method makes phylogenetic trees easier to interpret, adding meaning to the taxon order and helping to prevent misinterpretations. BioMed Central 2011-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3050728/ /pubmed/21352514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-58 Text en Copyright ©2011 Cerutti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cerutti, Francesco
Bertolotti, Luigi
Goldberg, Tony L
Giacobini, Mario
Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
title Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
title_full Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
title_fullStr Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
title_full_unstemmed Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
title_short Taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
title_sort taxon ordering in phylogenetic trees: a workbench test
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21352514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-58
work_keys_str_mv AT ceruttifrancesco taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest
AT bertolottiluigi taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest
AT goldbergtonyl taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest
AT giacobinimario taxonorderinginphylogenetictreesaworkbenchtest