Cargando…
"Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have identified a range of brief interventions which increase physical activity in previously sedentary people. A randomised controlled trial is needed to assess whether providing motivational interviewing, three months after giving initial advice, sustains physical ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-129 |
_version_ | 1782199383442325504 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Emma J Dimairo, Munyaradzi Hind, Daniel Goyder, Elizabeth Copeland, Robert J Breckon, Jeff D Crank, Helen Walters, Stephen J Loban, Amanda Cooper, Cindy L |
author_facet | Scott, Emma J Dimairo, Munyaradzi Hind, Daniel Goyder, Elizabeth Copeland, Robert J Breckon, Jeff D Crank, Helen Walters, Stephen J Loban, Amanda Cooper, Cindy L |
author_sort | Scott, Emma J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have identified a range of brief interventions which increase physical activity in previously sedentary people. A randomised controlled trial is needed to assess whether providing motivational interviewing, three months after giving initial advice, sustains physical activity levels in those who recently became physically active. This paper reports the results of an internal pilot study designed to test the feasibility of the study in terms of recruitment, per protocol delivery of the intervention and retention at three months. METHODS: Participants were: aged 40-64 years; resident in deprived areas of Sheffield, UK; and, had recently become physically active as a result of using a brief intervention following an invitation from a mass mailout. Interventions: Motivational Interviewing 'boosters' aimed at sustaining change in physical activity status delivered face-to-face or over the telephone compared with no further intervention. Outcomes of the feasibility study: recruitment of 60 participants from mailout of 3,300; retention of 45 participants with 3-month follow-up accelerometry measurements; 70% of those randomised to boosters receiving intervention per protocol. Sample size and power were recalculated using the accelerometry data collected. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were randomised (78% of the feasibility target); 37 participants were retained at three months, 29 with at least four days of accelerometry data (64% of the feasibility target); 79% of those allocated boosters received them per protocol (surpassing the feasibility target). The proposed sample size of 600 was confirmed as appropriate and power is expected to be sufficient to detect a difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The main study will continue with the original recruitment target of 600 participants but to ensure feasibility, it is necessary to increase recruitment and improve the numbers of those followed-up who have evaluable data. Strategies will include increasing the number of initial invitations sent out and improving the training of research assistants and participants in the positioning of the accelerometer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN56495859, ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00836459 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3050753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30507532011-03-09 "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study Scott, Emma J Dimairo, Munyaradzi Hind, Daniel Goyder, Elizabeth Copeland, Robert J Breckon, Jeff D Crank, Helen Walters, Stephen J Loban, Amanda Cooper, Cindy L BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have identified a range of brief interventions which increase physical activity in previously sedentary people. A randomised controlled trial is needed to assess whether providing motivational interviewing, three months after giving initial advice, sustains physical activity levels in those who recently became physically active. This paper reports the results of an internal pilot study designed to test the feasibility of the study in terms of recruitment, per protocol delivery of the intervention and retention at three months. METHODS: Participants were: aged 40-64 years; resident in deprived areas of Sheffield, UK; and, had recently become physically active as a result of using a brief intervention following an invitation from a mass mailout. Interventions: Motivational Interviewing 'boosters' aimed at sustaining change in physical activity status delivered face-to-face or over the telephone compared with no further intervention. Outcomes of the feasibility study: recruitment of 60 participants from mailout of 3,300; retention of 45 participants with 3-month follow-up accelerometry measurements; 70% of those randomised to boosters receiving intervention per protocol. Sample size and power were recalculated using the accelerometry data collected. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were randomised (78% of the feasibility target); 37 participants were retained at three months, 29 with at least four days of accelerometry data (64% of the feasibility target); 79% of those allocated boosters received them per protocol (surpassing the feasibility target). The proposed sample size of 600 was confirmed as appropriate and power is expected to be sufficient to detect a difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The main study will continue with the original recruitment target of 600 participants but to ensure feasibility, it is necessary to increase recruitment and improve the numbers of those followed-up who have evaluable data. Strategies will include increasing the number of initial invitations sent out and improving the training of research assistants and participants in the positioning of the accelerometer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN56495859, ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00836459 BioMed Central 2011-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3050753/ /pubmed/21345182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-129 Text en Copyright ©2011 Scott et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Scott, Emma J Dimairo, Munyaradzi Hind, Daniel Goyder, Elizabeth Copeland, Robert J Breckon, Jeff D Crank, Helen Walters, Stephen J Loban, Amanda Cooper, Cindy L "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
title | "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
title_full | "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
title_fullStr | "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
title_short | "Booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
title_sort | "booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods: internal pilot and feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottemmaj boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT dimairomunyaradzi boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT hinddaniel boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT goyderelizabeth boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT copelandrobertj boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT breckonjeffd boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT crankhelen boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT waltersstephenj boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT lobanamanda boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy AT coopercindyl boosterinterventionstosustainincreasesinphysicalactivityinmiddleagedadultsindeprivedurbanneighbourhoodsinternalpilotandfeasibilitystudy |