Cargando…

Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives

BACKGROUND: More than 30% of the pregnancies in women aged 35 and over are unintended. This paper compares perceptions about contraceptive methods and use among women with and without an unintended pregnancy after turning age 35. METHODS: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godfrey, Emily M, Chin, Nancy P, Fielding, Stephen L, Fiscella, Kevin, Dozier, Ann
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21324194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-5
_version_ 1782199402671112192
author Godfrey, Emily M
Chin, Nancy P
Fielding, Stephen L
Fiscella, Kevin
Dozier, Ann
author_facet Godfrey, Emily M
Chin, Nancy P
Fielding, Stephen L
Fiscella, Kevin
Dozier, Ann
author_sort Godfrey, Emily M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More than 30% of the pregnancies in women aged 35 and over are unintended. This paper compares perceptions about contraceptive methods and use among women with and without an unintended pregnancy after turning age 35. METHODS: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 women. They were all 35 to 49 years old, regularly menstruating, sexually active, not sterilized, not desiring a pregnancy in the near future, and at least 3 months postpartum. We purposely sampled for women who had had at least one unintended pregnancy after age 35 (n = 9) and women who did not (n = 8). We assessed partnership, views of pregnancy and motherhood, desired lifestyle, perceived advantages and disadvantages of using and obtaining currently available well-known reversible contraceptives in the U.S. ''We also assessed contraceptive methods used at any time during their reproductive years, including current method use and, if appropriate, circumstances surrounding an unintended pregnancy after age 35.'' Each interview was taped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using Grounded Theory. Analysis focused on partnership, views of pregnancy, motherhood, desired lifestyle and perceived advantages and disadvantages of various reversible contraceptive methods. RESULTS: The women without an unintended pregnancy after age 35 were more likely to (1) use contraceptive methods that helped treat a medical condition, (2) consider pregnancy as dangerous, or (3) express concerns about the responsibilities of motherhood. The women who experienced an unintended pregnancy after age 35 were more likely to (1) report unstable partnerships, (2) perceive themselves at lower risk of pregnancy, or (3) report past experiences with unwanted contraceptive side effects. There was a greater likelihood a woman would choose a contraceptive method if it was perceived as easy to use, accessible, affordable and had minimal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Women's perspective on contraceptive use after age 35 varies. Public health messages and health providers' care can help women in this age group by reviewing their fertility risks, as well as all contraceptive methods and their associated side effects. The impact of such interventions on unintended pregnancy rates in this age group should be tested in other areas of evidence-based medicine.
format Text
id pubmed-3050835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30508352011-03-09 Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives Godfrey, Emily M Chin, Nancy P Fielding, Stephen L Fiscella, Kevin Dozier, Ann BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: More than 30% of the pregnancies in women aged 35 and over are unintended. This paper compares perceptions about contraceptive methods and use among women with and without an unintended pregnancy after turning age 35. METHODS: Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 17 women. They were all 35 to 49 years old, regularly menstruating, sexually active, not sterilized, not desiring a pregnancy in the near future, and at least 3 months postpartum. We purposely sampled for women who had had at least one unintended pregnancy after age 35 (n = 9) and women who did not (n = 8). We assessed partnership, views of pregnancy and motherhood, desired lifestyle, perceived advantages and disadvantages of using and obtaining currently available well-known reversible contraceptives in the U.S. ''We also assessed contraceptive methods used at any time during their reproductive years, including current method use and, if appropriate, circumstances surrounding an unintended pregnancy after age 35.'' Each interview was taped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using Grounded Theory. Analysis focused on partnership, views of pregnancy, motherhood, desired lifestyle and perceived advantages and disadvantages of various reversible contraceptive methods. RESULTS: The women without an unintended pregnancy after age 35 were more likely to (1) use contraceptive methods that helped treat a medical condition, (2) consider pregnancy as dangerous, or (3) express concerns about the responsibilities of motherhood. The women who experienced an unintended pregnancy after age 35 were more likely to (1) report unstable partnerships, (2) perceive themselves at lower risk of pregnancy, or (3) report past experiences with unwanted contraceptive side effects. There was a greater likelihood a woman would choose a contraceptive method if it was perceived as easy to use, accessible, affordable and had minimal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Women's perspective on contraceptive use after age 35 varies. Public health messages and health providers' care can help women in this age group by reviewing their fertility risks, as well as all contraceptive methods and their associated side effects. The impact of such interventions on unintended pregnancy rates in this age group should be tested in other areas of evidence-based medicine. BioMed Central 2011-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3050835/ /pubmed/21324194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-5 Text en Copyright ©2011 Godfrey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Godfrey, Emily M
Chin, Nancy P
Fielding, Stephen L
Fiscella, Kevin
Dozier, Ann
Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
title Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
title_full Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
title_fullStr Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
title_short Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
title_sort contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: a qualitative study of perspectives
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21324194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-5
work_keys_str_mv AT godfreyemilym contraceptivemethodsandusebywomenaged35andoveraqualitativestudyofperspectives
AT chinnancyp contraceptivemethodsandusebywomenaged35andoveraqualitativestudyofperspectives
AT fieldingstephenl contraceptivemethodsandusebywomenaged35andoveraqualitativestudyofperspectives
AT fiscellakevin contraceptivemethodsandusebywomenaged35andoveraqualitativestudyofperspectives
AT dozierann contraceptivemethodsandusebywomenaged35andoveraqualitativestudyofperspectives