Cargando…

Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the interobserver variability in chest computed tomography (CT) and whole body 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) screening for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. PROCEDURE: C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senft, Asaf, de Bree, Remco, Golding, Richard P., Comans, Emile F. I., Van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M., Kuik, J. Dirk, Hoekstra, Otto S., Leemans, C. René
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3051106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20533092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0354-5
_version_ 1782199442335596544
author Senft, Asaf
de Bree, Remco
Golding, Richard P.
Comans, Emile F. I.
Van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M.
Kuik, J. Dirk
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Leemans, C. René
author_facet Senft, Asaf
de Bree, Remco
Golding, Richard P.
Comans, Emile F. I.
Van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M.
Kuik, J. Dirk
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Leemans, C. René
author_sort Senft, Asaf
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the interobserver variability in chest computed tomography (CT) and whole body 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) screening for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. PROCEDURE: Chest CT and whole body FDG-PET of 69 HNSCC patients with high-risk factors who underwent screening for distant metastases were analyzed. All scans were independently read by two experienced radiologists or nuclear physicians who were blinded to the other examinations and follow-up results. RESULTS: A kappa of 0.516 was found for assessment of size on CT. Kappa values for origin and susceptibility of 0.406 and 0.512 for CT and 0.834 and 0.939 for PET were found, respectively. The overall conclusions had a kappa of 0.517–0.634 for CT and 0.820–1.000 for PET. CONCLUSIONS: In screening for distant metastases in HNSCC patients with high-risk factors, chest CT readings had a reasonable to substantial agreement, while PET readings showed an almost perfect agreement. These findings suggest that for optimal assessment in clinical practice, PET most often can be scored by one observer, but CT should probably more often be scored by different observers in consensus or combined with PET.
format Text
id pubmed-3051106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30511062011-04-05 Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Senft, Asaf de Bree, Remco Golding, Richard P. Comans, Emile F. I. Van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M. Kuik, J. Dirk Hoekstra, Otto S. Leemans, C. René Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the interobserver variability in chest computed tomography (CT) and whole body 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) screening for distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. PROCEDURE: Chest CT and whole body FDG-PET of 69 HNSCC patients with high-risk factors who underwent screening for distant metastases were analyzed. All scans were independently read by two experienced radiologists or nuclear physicians who were blinded to the other examinations and follow-up results. RESULTS: A kappa of 0.516 was found for assessment of size on CT. Kappa values for origin and susceptibility of 0.406 and 0.512 for CT and 0.834 and 0.939 for PET were found, respectively. The overall conclusions had a kappa of 0.517–0.634 for CT and 0.820–1.000 for PET. CONCLUSIONS: In screening for distant metastases in HNSCC patients with high-risk factors, chest CT readings had a reasonable to substantial agreement, while PET readings showed an almost perfect agreement. These findings suggest that for optimal assessment in clinical practice, PET most often can be scored by one observer, but CT should probably more often be scored by different observers in consensus or combined with PET. Springer-Verlag 2010-06-09 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3051106/ /pubmed/20533092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0354-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Senft, Asaf
de Bree, Remco
Golding, Richard P.
Comans, Emile F. I.
Van Waesberghe, Jan-Hein T. M.
Kuik, J. Dirk
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Leemans, C. René
Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_full Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_short Interobserver Variability in Chest CT and Whole Body FDG-PET Screening for Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
title_sort interobserver variability in chest ct and whole body fdg-pet screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3051106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20533092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0354-5
work_keys_str_mv AT senftasaf interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT debreeremco interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT goldingrichardp interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT comansemilefi interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT vanwaesberghejanheintm interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT kuikjdirk interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT hoekstraottos interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients
AT leemanscrene interobservervariabilityinchestctandwholebodyfdgpetscreeningfordistantmetastasesinheadandneckcancerpatients