Cargando…

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species

PURPOSE: PCR is widely used for rapidly and accurately detecting Mycobacterium Species. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of three real-time PCR kits and evaluate the concordance with two older PCR methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 128 samples, the five PCR metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Sun Young, Kim, Min Jin, Suh, Jin-Tae, Lee, Hee Joo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3051208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21319350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.301
_version_ 1782199454478106624
author Cho, Sun Young
Kim, Min Jin
Suh, Jin-Tae
Lee, Hee Joo
author_facet Cho, Sun Young
Kim, Min Jin
Suh, Jin-Tae
Lee, Hee Joo
author_sort Cho, Sun Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: PCR is widely used for rapidly and accurately detecting Mycobacterium Species. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of three real-time PCR kits and evaluate the concordance with two older PCR methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 128 samples, the five PCR methods were assessed, including an in-house PCR protocol, the COBAS Amplicor MTB, the COBAS TaqMan MTB, the AdvanSure TB/NTM real-time PCR, and the Real-Q M. tuberculosis kit. The discrepant results were further examined by DNA sequencing and using the AdvanSure Mycobacteria Genotyping Chip for complete analysis. RESULTS: For Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection, all five kits showed 100% matching results (positive; N = 11 and negative; N = 80). In non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) discrimination, the AdvanSure yielded two true-positive outcomes from M. intracellulare and one false positive outcome, while the Real-Q resulted in one true-positive outcome and one false negative outcome for each case and another false negative result using the provided DNA samples. CONCLUSION: Real-time PCR, yielded results that were comparable to those of the older PCR methods for detecting MTB. However, there were disagreements among the applied kits in regard to the sample test results for detecting NTM. Therefore, we recommend that additional confirmatory measures such as DNA sequencing should be implemented in such cases, and further research with using a larger numbers of samples is warranted to improve the detection of NTM.
format Text
id pubmed-3051208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30512082011-03-09 Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species Cho, Sun Young Kim, Min Jin Suh, Jin-Tae Lee, Hee Joo Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: PCR is widely used for rapidly and accurately detecting Mycobacterium Species. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of three real-time PCR kits and evaluate the concordance with two older PCR methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 128 samples, the five PCR methods were assessed, including an in-house PCR protocol, the COBAS Amplicor MTB, the COBAS TaqMan MTB, the AdvanSure TB/NTM real-time PCR, and the Real-Q M. tuberculosis kit. The discrepant results were further examined by DNA sequencing and using the AdvanSure Mycobacteria Genotyping Chip for complete analysis. RESULTS: For Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection, all five kits showed 100% matching results (positive; N = 11 and negative; N = 80). In non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) discrimination, the AdvanSure yielded two true-positive outcomes from M. intracellulare and one false positive outcome, while the Real-Q resulted in one true-positive outcome and one false negative outcome for each case and another false negative result using the provided DNA samples. CONCLUSION: Real-time PCR, yielded results that were comparable to those of the older PCR methods for detecting MTB. However, there were disagreements among the applied kits in regard to the sample test results for detecting NTM. Therefore, we recommend that additional confirmatory measures such as DNA sequencing should be implemented in such cases, and further research with using a larger numbers of samples is warranted to improve the detection of NTM. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011-03-01 2011-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3051208/ /pubmed/21319350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.301 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Sun Young
Kim, Min Jin
Suh, Jin-Tae
Lee, Hee Joo
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species
title Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species
title_full Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species
title_fullStr Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species
title_short Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Three Real-Time PCR Kits for Detecting Mycobacterium Species
title_sort comparison of diagnostic performance of three real-time pcr kits for detecting mycobacterium species
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3051208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21319350
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.2.301
work_keys_str_mv AT chosunyoung comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofthreerealtimepcrkitsfordetectingmycobacteriumspecies
AT kimminjin comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofthreerealtimepcrkitsfordetectingmycobacteriumspecies
AT suhjintae comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofthreerealtimepcrkitsfordetectingmycobacteriumspecies
AT leeheejoo comparisonofdiagnosticperformanceofthreerealtimepcrkitsfordetectingmycobacteriumspecies