Cargando…

Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives

BACKGROUND: Available evidence suggests that improvements in genetics education are needed to prepare primary care providers for the impact of ongoing rapid advances in genomics. Postgraduate (physician training) and master (midwifery training) programmes in primary care and public health are failin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houwink, Elisa JF, van Luijk, Scheltus J, Henneman, Lidewij, van der Vleuten, Cees, Jan Dinant, Geert, Cornel, Martina C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3053218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21329524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-5
_version_ 1782199711084576768
author Houwink, Elisa JF
van Luijk, Scheltus J
Henneman, Lidewij
van der Vleuten, Cees
Jan Dinant, Geert
Cornel, Martina C
author_facet Houwink, Elisa JF
van Luijk, Scheltus J
Henneman, Lidewij
van der Vleuten, Cees
Jan Dinant, Geert
Cornel, Martina C
author_sort Houwink, Elisa JF
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Available evidence suggests that improvements in genetics education are needed to prepare primary care providers for the impact of ongoing rapid advances in genomics. Postgraduate (physician training) and master (midwifery training) programmes in primary care and public health are failing to meet these perceived educational needs. The aim of this study was to explore the role of genetics in primary care (i.e. family medicine and midwifery care) and the need for education in this area as perceived by primary care providers, patient advocacy groups and clinical genetics professionals. METHODS: Forty-four participants took part in three types of focus groups: mono-disciplinary groups of general practitioners and midwives, respectively and multidisciplinary groups composed of a diverse set of experts. The focus group sessions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis. Recurrent themes were identified. RESULTS: Four themes emerged regarding the educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: (1) genetics knowledge, (2) family history, (3) ethical dilemmas and psychosocial effects in relation to genetics and (4) insight into the organisation and role of clinical genetics services. These themes reflect a shift in the role of genetics in primary care with implications for education. Although all focus group participants acknowledged the importance of genetics education, general practitioners felt this need more urgently than midwives and more strongly emphasized their perceived knowledge deficiencies. CONCLUSION: The responsibilities of primary care providers with regard to genetics require further study. The results of this study will help to develop effective genetics education strategies to improve primary care providers' competencies in this area. More research into the educational priorities in genetics is needed to design courses that are suitable for postgraduate and master programmes for general practitioners and midwives.
format Text
id pubmed-3053218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30532182011-03-11 Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives Houwink, Elisa JF van Luijk, Scheltus J Henneman, Lidewij van der Vleuten, Cees Jan Dinant, Geert Cornel, Martina C BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Available evidence suggests that improvements in genetics education are needed to prepare primary care providers for the impact of ongoing rapid advances in genomics. Postgraduate (physician training) and master (midwifery training) programmes in primary care and public health are failing to meet these perceived educational needs. The aim of this study was to explore the role of genetics in primary care (i.e. family medicine and midwifery care) and the need for education in this area as perceived by primary care providers, patient advocacy groups and clinical genetics professionals. METHODS: Forty-four participants took part in three types of focus groups: mono-disciplinary groups of general practitioners and midwives, respectively and multidisciplinary groups composed of a diverse set of experts. The focus group sessions were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis. Recurrent themes were identified. RESULTS: Four themes emerged regarding the educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: (1) genetics knowledge, (2) family history, (3) ethical dilemmas and psychosocial effects in relation to genetics and (4) insight into the organisation and role of clinical genetics services. These themes reflect a shift in the role of genetics in primary care with implications for education. Although all focus group participants acknowledged the importance of genetics education, general practitioners felt this need more urgently than midwives and more strongly emphasized their perceived knowledge deficiencies. CONCLUSION: The responsibilities of primary care providers with regard to genetics require further study. The results of this study will help to develop effective genetics education strategies to improve primary care providers' competencies in this area. More research into the educational priorities in genetics is needed to design courses that are suitable for postgraduate and master programmes for general practitioners and midwives. BioMed Central 2011-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3053218/ /pubmed/21329524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-5 Text en Copyright ©2011 Houwink et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Houwink, Elisa JF
van Luijk, Scheltus J
Henneman, Lidewij
van der Vleuten, Cees
Jan Dinant, Geert
Cornel, Martina C
Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
title Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
title_full Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
title_fullStr Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
title_short Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
title_sort genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3053218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21329524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-5
work_keys_str_mv AT houwinkelisajf geneticeducationalneedsandtheroleofgeneticsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudywithmultipleperspectives
AT vanluijkscheltusj geneticeducationalneedsandtheroleofgeneticsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudywithmultipleperspectives
AT hennemanlidewij geneticeducationalneedsandtheroleofgeneticsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudywithmultipleperspectives
AT vandervleutencees geneticeducationalneedsandtheroleofgeneticsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudywithmultipleperspectives
AT jandinantgeert geneticeducationalneedsandtheroleofgeneticsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudywithmultipleperspectives
AT cornelmartinac geneticeducationalneedsandtheroleofgeneticsinprimarycareafocusgroupstudywithmultipleperspectives