Cargando…

Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.

The authors analyzed the difference between two surgical procedures, stereotactic endoscopic removal (SER) and stereotactic catheter drainage (SCD), in 18 patients of ganglionic intracerebral hematoma (ICH). Ten patients underwent SCD and eight SER within 24 hours of insult. The mean age was 53.3 (3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, M. H., Kim, E. Y., Song, J. H., Shin, K. M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3054516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9811185
_version_ 1782199964308340736
author Kim, M. H.
Kim, E. Y.
Song, J. H.
Shin, K. M.
author_facet Kim, M. H.
Kim, E. Y.
Song, J. H.
Shin, K. M.
author_sort Kim, M. H.
collection PubMed
description The authors analyzed the difference between two surgical procedures, stereotactic endoscopic removal (SER) and stereotactic catheter drainage (SCD), in 18 patients of ganglionic intracerebral hematoma (ICH). Ten patients underwent SCD and eight SER within 24 hours of insult. The mean age was 53.3 (33-81) years and male to female ratio was 11:7. The mean volume of hematoma was 34.4 (23-105) ml. All patients had major neurological deficits without signs of transtentorial herniation. Mean follow-up was 8 (6-10) months. Under local anesthesia, Otzuki's cannula was placed through a burr hole. ICH was removed with suction and forceps under endoscopic guidance. Hemostasis was performed with Nd-YAG laser. For SCD, we used silicone catheter and urokinase. The hematoma was drained in 3-5 days in SER, whereas 7-10 days in SCD. Postoperative rebleeding occurred in one case of SER. Mortality rate was 13% in SER, 10% in SCD. The patients who gained most from these treatments were those who had been admitted with an impaired level of consciousness. The whole procedure can be done under direct vision in SER, so SER might replace SCD with similar mortality.
format Text
id pubmed-3054516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
publisher Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30545162011-03-15 Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage. Kim, M. H. Kim, E. Y. Song, J. H. Shin, K. M. J Korean Med Sci Research Article The authors analyzed the difference between two surgical procedures, stereotactic endoscopic removal (SER) and stereotactic catheter drainage (SCD), in 18 patients of ganglionic intracerebral hematoma (ICH). Ten patients underwent SCD and eight SER within 24 hours of insult. The mean age was 53.3 (33-81) years and male to female ratio was 11:7. The mean volume of hematoma was 34.4 (23-105) ml. All patients had major neurological deficits without signs of transtentorial herniation. Mean follow-up was 8 (6-10) months. Under local anesthesia, Otzuki's cannula was placed through a burr hole. ICH was removed with suction and forceps under endoscopic guidance. Hemostasis was performed with Nd-YAG laser. For SCD, we used silicone catheter and urokinase. The hematoma was drained in 3-5 days in SER, whereas 7-10 days in SCD. Postoperative rebleeding occurred in one case of SER. Mortality rate was 13% in SER, 10% in SCD. The patients who gained most from these treatments were those who had been admitted with an impaired level of consciousness. The whole procedure can be done under direct vision in SER, so SER might replace SCD with similar mortality. Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 1998-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3054516/ /pubmed/9811185 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, M. H.
Kim, E. Y.
Song, J. H.
Shin, K. M.
Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
title Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
title_full Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
title_fullStr Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
title_full_unstemmed Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
title_short Surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
title_sort surgical options of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma: stereotactic endoscopic removal versus stereotactic catheter drainage.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3054516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9811185
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmh surgicaloptionsofhypertensiveintracerebralhematomastereotacticendoscopicremovalversusstereotacticcatheterdrainage
AT kimey surgicaloptionsofhypertensiveintracerebralhematomastereotacticendoscopicremovalversusstereotacticcatheterdrainage
AT songjh surgicaloptionsofhypertensiveintracerebralhematomastereotacticendoscopicremovalversusstereotacticcatheterdrainage
AT shinkm surgicaloptionsofhypertensiveintracerebralhematomastereotacticendoscopicremovalversusstereotacticcatheterdrainage