Cargando…

The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands

BACKGROUND: In genetics it is customary to refer to double-stranded DNA as containing a "Watson strand" and a "Crick strand." However, there seems to be no consensus in the literature on the exact meaning of these two terms, and the many usages contradict one another as well as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cartwright, Reed A, Graur, Dan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-7
_version_ 1782200121104007168
author Cartwright, Reed A
Graur, Dan
author_facet Cartwright, Reed A
Graur, Dan
author_sort Cartwright, Reed A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In genetics it is customary to refer to double-stranded DNA as containing a "Watson strand" and a "Crick strand." However, there seems to be no consensus in the literature on the exact meaning of these two terms, and the many usages contradict one another as well as the original definition. Here, we review the history of the terminology and suggest retaining a single sense that is currently the most useful and consistent. PROPOSAL: The Saccharomyces Genome Database defines the Watson strand as the strand which has its 5'-end at the short-arm telomere and the Crick strand as its complement. The Watson strand is always used as the reference strand in their database. Using this as the basis of our standard, we recommend that Watson and Crick strand terminology only be used in the context of genomics. When possible, the centromere or other genomic feature should be used as a reference point, dividing the chromosome into two arms of unequal lengths. Under our proposal, the Watson strand is standardized as the strand whose 5'-end is on the short arm of the chromosome, and the Crick strand as the one whose 5'-end is on the long arm. Furthermore, the Watson strand should be retained as the reference (plus) strand in a genomic database. This usage not only makes the determination of Watson and Crick unambiguous, but also allows unambiguous selection of reference stands for genomics. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by John M. Logsdon, Igor B. Rogozin (nominated by Andrey Rzhetsky), and William Martin.
format Text
id pubmed-3055211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30552112011-03-12 The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands Cartwright, Reed A Graur, Dan Biol Direct Opinion BACKGROUND: In genetics it is customary to refer to double-stranded DNA as containing a "Watson strand" and a "Crick strand." However, there seems to be no consensus in the literature on the exact meaning of these two terms, and the many usages contradict one another as well as the original definition. Here, we review the history of the terminology and suggest retaining a single sense that is currently the most useful and consistent. PROPOSAL: The Saccharomyces Genome Database defines the Watson strand as the strand which has its 5'-end at the short-arm telomere and the Crick strand as its complement. The Watson strand is always used as the reference strand in their database. Using this as the basis of our standard, we recommend that Watson and Crick strand terminology only be used in the context of genomics. When possible, the centromere or other genomic feature should be used as a reference point, dividing the chromosome into two arms of unequal lengths. Under our proposal, the Watson strand is standardized as the strand whose 5'-end is on the short arm of the chromosome, and the Crick strand as the one whose 5'-end is on the long arm. Furthermore, the Watson strand should be retained as the reference (plus) strand in a genomic database. This usage not only makes the determination of Watson and Crick unambiguous, but also allows unambiguous selection of reference stands for genomics. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by John M. Logsdon, Igor B. Rogozin (nominated by Andrey Rzhetsky), and William Martin. BioMed Central 2011-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3055211/ /pubmed/21303550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-7 Text en Copyright ©2011 Cartwright and Graur; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Opinion
Cartwright, Reed A
Graur, Dan
The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands
title The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands
title_full The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands
title_fullStr The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands
title_full_unstemmed The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands
title_short The multiple personalities of Watson and Crick strands
title_sort multiple personalities of watson and crick strands
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21303550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-6-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cartwrightreeda themultiplepersonalitiesofwatsonandcrickstrands
AT graurdan themultiplepersonalitiesofwatsonandcrickstrands
AT cartwrightreeda multiplepersonalitiesofwatsonandcrickstrands
AT graurdan multiplepersonalitiesofwatsonandcrickstrands