Cargando…

Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Longo, Umile Giuseppe, Banerjee, Sughran, Barber, Julie, Chambler, Andrew, Cobiella, Carlos, Corbett, Steven, Crowther, Mark, Drew, Steven, Francis, Andrea, Lee, Marcus, Garlick, Nicholas, Packham, Iain, Pearse, Yemi, Richards, Andrew, Roberts, Chris, Tennent, Duncan, Tims, Emily, Ahrens, Philip Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57
_version_ 1782200145504370688
author Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Banerjee, Sughran
Barber, Julie
Chambler, Andrew
Cobiella, Carlos
Corbett, Steven
Crowther, Mark
Drew, Steven
Francis, Andrea
Lee, Marcus
Garlick, Nicholas
Packham, Iain
Pearse, Yemi
Richards, Andrew
Roberts, Chris
Tennent, Duncan
Tims, Emily
Ahrens, Philip Michael
author_facet Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Banerjee, Sughran
Barber, Julie
Chambler, Andrew
Cobiella, Carlos
Corbett, Steven
Crowther, Mark
Drew, Steven
Francis, Andrea
Lee, Marcus
Garlick, Nicholas
Packham, Iain
Pearse, Yemi
Richards, Andrew
Roberts, Chris
Tennent, Duncan
Tims, Emily
Ahrens, Philip Michael
author_sort Longo, Umile Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome can be unsatisfactory. In particular it is not clear whether surgery produces better outcomes than non-surgical management. Currently there is much variation in the use of surgery and a lack of good quality evidence to inform our decision. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to undertake a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Surgical treatment will be performed using the Acumed clavicle fixation system. Conservative management will consist of immobilisation in a sling at the side in internal rotation for 6 weeks or until clinical or radiological union. We aim to recruit 300 patients. These patients will be followed-up for at least 9 months. The primary endpoint will be the rate of non-union at 3 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints will be limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 9 months post-operatively. DISCUSSION: This article presents the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. It gives extensive details of, and the basis for, the chosen methods, and describes the key measures taken to avoid bias and to ensure validity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United Kingdom Clinical Research Network ID: 8665. The date of registration of the trial is 07/09/2006. The date the first patient was recruited is 18/12/2007.
format Text
id pubmed-3055830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30558302011-03-12 Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial Longo, Umile Giuseppe Banerjee, Sughran Barber, Julie Chambler, Andrew Cobiella, Carlos Corbett, Steven Crowther, Mark Drew, Steven Francis, Andrea Lee, Marcus Garlick, Nicholas Packham, Iain Pearse, Yemi Richards, Andrew Roberts, Chris Tennent, Duncan Tims, Emily Ahrens, Philip Michael Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome can be unsatisfactory. In particular it is not clear whether surgery produces better outcomes than non-surgical management. Currently there is much variation in the use of surgery and a lack of good quality evidence to inform our decision. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to undertake a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Surgical treatment will be performed using the Acumed clavicle fixation system. Conservative management will consist of immobilisation in a sling at the side in internal rotation for 6 weeks or until clinical or radiological union. We aim to recruit 300 patients. These patients will be followed-up for at least 9 months. The primary endpoint will be the rate of non-union at 3 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints will be limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 9 months post-operatively. DISCUSSION: This article presents the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. It gives extensive details of, and the basis for, the chosen methods, and describes the key measures taken to avoid bias and to ensure validity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United Kingdom Clinical Research Network ID: 8665. The date of registration of the trial is 07/09/2006. The date the first patient was recruited is 18/12/2007. BioMed Central 2011-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3055830/ /pubmed/21356050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57 Text en Copyright ©2011 Longo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
Banerjee, Sughran
Barber, Julie
Chambler, Andrew
Cobiella, Carlos
Corbett, Steven
Crowther, Mark
Drew, Steven
Francis, Andrea
Lee, Marcus
Garlick, Nicholas
Packham, Iain
Pearse, Yemi
Richards, Andrew
Roberts, Chris
Tennent, Duncan
Tims, Emily
Ahrens, Philip Michael
Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_short Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
title_sort conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - the clavicle trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57
work_keys_str_mv AT longoumilegiuseppe conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT banerjeesughran conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT barberjulie conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chamblerandrew conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cobiellacarlos conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT corbettsteven conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT crowthermark conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT drewsteven conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT francisandrea conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leemarcus conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT garlicknicholas conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT packhamiain conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pearseyemi conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT richardsandrew conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT robertschris conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tennentduncan conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT timsemily conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahrensphilipmichael conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial