Cargando…
Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57 |
_version_ | 1782200145504370688 |
---|---|
author | Longo, Umile Giuseppe Banerjee, Sughran Barber, Julie Chambler, Andrew Cobiella, Carlos Corbett, Steven Crowther, Mark Drew, Steven Francis, Andrea Lee, Marcus Garlick, Nicholas Packham, Iain Pearse, Yemi Richards, Andrew Roberts, Chris Tennent, Duncan Tims, Emily Ahrens, Philip Michael |
author_facet | Longo, Umile Giuseppe Banerjee, Sughran Barber, Julie Chambler, Andrew Cobiella, Carlos Corbett, Steven Crowther, Mark Drew, Steven Francis, Andrea Lee, Marcus Garlick, Nicholas Packham, Iain Pearse, Yemi Richards, Andrew Roberts, Chris Tennent, Duncan Tims, Emily Ahrens, Philip Michael |
author_sort | Longo, Umile Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome can be unsatisfactory. In particular it is not clear whether surgery produces better outcomes than non-surgical management. Currently there is much variation in the use of surgery and a lack of good quality evidence to inform our decision. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to undertake a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Surgical treatment will be performed using the Acumed clavicle fixation system. Conservative management will consist of immobilisation in a sling at the side in internal rotation for 6 weeks or until clinical or radiological union. We aim to recruit 300 patients. These patients will be followed-up for at least 9 months. The primary endpoint will be the rate of non-union at 3 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints will be limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 9 months post-operatively. DISCUSSION: This article presents the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. It gives extensive details of, and the basis for, the chosen methods, and describes the key measures taken to avoid bias and to ensure validity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United Kingdom Clinical Research Network ID: 8665. The date of registration of the trial is 07/09/2006. The date the first patient was recruited is 18/12/2007. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3055830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30558302011-03-12 Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial Longo, Umile Giuseppe Banerjee, Sughran Barber, Julie Chambler, Andrew Cobiella, Carlos Corbett, Steven Crowther, Mark Drew, Steven Francis, Andrea Lee, Marcus Garlick, Nicholas Packham, Iain Pearse, Yemi Richards, Andrew Roberts, Chris Tennent, Duncan Tims, Emily Ahrens, Philip Michael Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures account for around 4% of all fractures and up to 44% of fractures of the shoulder girdle. Fractures of the middle third (or mid-shaft) account for approximately 80% of all clavicle fractures. Management of this group of fractures is often challenging and the outcome can be unsatisfactory. In particular it is not clear whether surgery produces better outcomes than non-surgical management. Currently there is much variation in the use of surgery and a lack of good quality evidence to inform our decision. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to undertake a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults. Surgical treatment will be performed using the Acumed clavicle fixation system. Conservative management will consist of immobilisation in a sling at the side in internal rotation for 6 weeks or until clinical or radiological union. We aim to recruit 300 patients. These patients will be followed-up for at least 9 months. The primary endpoint will be the rate of non-union at 3 months following treatment. Secondary endpoints will be limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 9 months post-operatively. DISCUSSION: This article presents the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. It gives extensive details of, and the basis for, the chosen methods, and describes the key measures taken to avoid bias and to ensure validity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United Kingdom Clinical Research Network ID: 8665. The date of registration of the trial is 07/09/2006. The date the first patient was recruited is 18/12/2007. BioMed Central 2011-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3055830/ /pubmed/21356050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57 Text en Copyright ©2011 Longo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Longo, Umile Giuseppe Banerjee, Sughran Barber, Julie Chambler, Andrew Cobiella, Carlos Corbett, Steven Crowther, Mark Drew, Steven Francis, Andrea Lee, Marcus Garlick, Nicholas Packham, Iain Pearse, Yemi Richards, Andrew Roberts, Chris Tennent, Duncan Tims, Emily Ahrens, Philip Michael Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title | Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - The Clavicle Trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | conservative management versus open reduction and internal fixation for mid-shaft clavicle fractures in adults - the clavicle trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-57 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longoumilegiuseppe conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT banerjeesughran conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT barberjulie conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chamblerandrew conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cobiellacarlos conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT corbettsteven conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT crowthermark conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT drewsteven conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT francisandrea conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leemarcus conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT garlicknicholas conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT packhamiain conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pearseyemi conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT richardsandrew conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT robertschris conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tennentduncan conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT timsemily conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ahrensphilipmichael conservativemanagementversusopenreductionandinternalfixationformidshaftclaviclefracturesinadultstheclavicletrialstudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomizedcontrolledtrial |