Cargando…
Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: Are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that use the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) approach are increasingly being published. Such trials have a preponderance of post-randomization exclusions, industry sponsorship, and favourable findings, and little is known whether in terms of these i...
Autores principales: | Montedori, Alessandro, Bonacini, Maria Isabella, Casazza, Giovanni, Luchetta, Maria Laura, Duca, Piergiorgio, Cozzolino, Francesco, Abraha, Iosief |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3055831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-58 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
por: Abraha, Iosief, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Validity of peptic ulcer disease and upper gastrointestinal bleeding diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review protocol
por: Montedori, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Abraha, Iosief, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol
por: Rimland, Joseph M, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project
por: Cozzolino, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2017)