Cargando…

Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture

Oral posture is considered to have a major influence on the development and reoccurrence of malocclusion. A biofunctional model was tested with the null hypotheses that (1) there are no significant differences between pressures during different oral functions and (2) between pressure measurements in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engelke, Wilfried, Jung, Klaus, Knösel, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20127264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0367-0
_version_ 1782200168622325760
author Engelke, Wilfried
Jung, Klaus
Knösel, Michael
author_facet Engelke, Wilfried
Jung, Klaus
Knösel, Michael
author_sort Engelke, Wilfried
collection PubMed
description Oral posture is considered to have a major influence on the development and reoccurrence of malocclusion. A biofunctional model was tested with the null hypotheses that (1) there are no significant differences between pressures during different oral functions and (2) between pressure measurements in different oral compartments in order to substantiate various postural conditions at rest by intra-oral pressure dynamics. Atmospheric pressure monitoring was simultaneously carried out with a digital manometer in the vestibular inter-occlusal space (IOS) and at the palatal vault (sub-palatal space, SPS). Twenty subjects with normal occlusion were evaluated during the open-mouth condition (OC), gently closed lips (semi-open compartment condition, SC), with closed compartments after the generation of a negative pressure (CCN) and swallowing (SW). Pressure curve characteristics were compared between the different measurement phases (OC, SC, CCN, SW) as well as between the two compartments (IOS, SPS) using analysis of variance and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests adopting a significance level of α = 0.05. Both null hypotheses were rejected. Average pressures (IOS, SPS) in the experimental phases were 0.0, −0.08 (OC); −0.16, −1.0 (SC); −48.79, −81.86 (CCN); and −29.25, −62.51 (SW) mbar. CCN plateau and peak characteristics significantly differed between the two compartments SPS and IOS. These results indicate the formation of two different intra-oral functional anatomical compartments which provide a deeper understanding of orofacial biofunctions and explain previous observations of negative intra-oral pressures at rest.
format Text
id pubmed-3056003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30560032011-04-05 Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture Engelke, Wilfried Jung, Klaus Knösel, Michael Clin Oral Investig Original Article Oral posture is considered to have a major influence on the development and reoccurrence of malocclusion. A biofunctional model was tested with the null hypotheses that (1) there are no significant differences between pressures during different oral functions and (2) between pressure measurements in different oral compartments in order to substantiate various postural conditions at rest by intra-oral pressure dynamics. Atmospheric pressure monitoring was simultaneously carried out with a digital manometer in the vestibular inter-occlusal space (IOS) and at the palatal vault (sub-palatal space, SPS). Twenty subjects with normal occlusion were evaluated during the open-mouth condition (OC), gently closed lips (semi-open compartment condition, SC), with closed compartments after the generation of a negative pressure (CCN) and swallowing (SW). Pressure curve characteristics were compared between the different measurement phases (OC, SC, CCN, SW) as well as between the two compartments (IOS, SPS) using analysis of variance and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests adopting a significance level of α = 0.05. Both null hypotheses were rejected. Average pressures (IOS, SPS) in the experimental phases were 0.0, −0.08 (OC); −0.16, −1.0 (SC); −48.79, −81.86 (CCN); and −29.25, −62.51 (SW) mbar. CCN plateau and peak characteristics significantly differed between the two compartments SPS and IOS. These results indicate the formation of two different intra-oral functional anatomical compartments which provide a deeper understanding of orofacial biofunctions and explain previous observations of negative intra-oral pressures at rest. Springer-Verlag 2010-02-02 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3056003/ /pubmed/20127264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0367-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Engelke, Wilfried
Jung, Klaus
Knösel, Michael
Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
title Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
title_full Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
title_fullStr Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
title_full_unstemmed Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
title_short Intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
title_sort intra-oral compartment pressures: a biofunctional model and experimental measurements under different conditions of posture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20127264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0367-0
work_keys_str_mv AT engelkewilfried intraoralcompartmentpressuresabiofunctionalmodelandexperimentalmeasurementsunderdifferentconditionsofposture
AT jungklaus intraoralcompartmentpressuresabiofunctionalmodelandexperimentalmeasurementsunderdifferentconditionsofposture
AT knoselmichael intraoralcompartmentpressuresabiofunctionalmodelandexperimentalmeasurementsunderdifferentconditionsofposture