Cargando…
A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies
The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies is accompanied with the development of many whole-genome sequence assembly methods and software, especially for de novo fragment assembly. Due to the poor knowledge about the applicability and performance of these software tools, choosing a befit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017915 |
_version_ | 1782200227150692352 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Wenyu Chen, Jiajia Yang, Yang Tang, Yifei Shang, Jing Shen, Bairong |
author_facet | Zhang, Wenyu Chen, Jiajia Yang, Yang Tang, Yifei Shang, Jing Shen, Bairong |
author_sort | Zhang, Wenyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies is accompanied with the development of many whole-genome sequence assembly methods and software, especially for de novo fragment assembly. Due to the poor knowledge about the applicability and performance of these software tools, choosing a befitting assembler becomes a tough task. Here, we provide the information of adaptivity for each program, then above all, compare the performance of eight distinct tools against eight groups of simulated datasets from Solexa sequencing platform. Considering the computational time, maximum random access memory (RAM) occupancy, assembly accuracy and integrity, our study indicate that string-based assemblers, overlap-layout-consensus (OLC) assemblers are well-suited for very short reads and longer reads of small genomes respectively. For large datasets of more than hundred millions of short reads, De Bruijn graph-based assemblers would be more appropriate. In terms of software implementation, string-based assemblers are superior to graph-based ones, of which SOAPdenovo is complex for the creation of configuration file. Our comparison study will assist researchers in selecting a well-suited assembler and offer essential information for the improvement of existing assemblers or the developing of novel assemblers. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3056720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30567202011-03-18 A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies Zhang, Wenyu Chen, Jiajia Yang, Yang Tang, Yifei Shang, Jing Shen, Bairong PLoS One Research Article The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies is accompanied with the development of many whole-genome sequence assembly methods and software, especially for de novo fragment assembly. Due to the poor knowledge about the applicability and performance of these software tools, choosing a befitting assembler becomes a tough task. Here, we provide the information of adaptivity for each program, then above all, compare the performance of eight distinct tools against eight groups of simulated datasets from Solexa sequencing platform. Considering the computational time, maximum random access memory (RAM) occupancy, assembly accuracy and integrity, our study indicate that string-based assemblers, overlap-layout-consensus (OLC) assemblers are well-suited for very short reads and longer reads of small genomes respectively. For large datasets of more than hundred millions of short reads, De Bruijn graph-based assemblers would be more appropriate. In terms of software implementation, string-based assemblers are superior to graph-based ones, of which SOAPdenovo is complex for the creation of configuration file. Our comparison study will assist researchers in selecting a well-suited assembler and offer essential information for the improvement of existing assemblers or the developing of novel assemblers. Public Library of Science 2011-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3056720/ /pubmed/21423806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017915 Text en Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Wenyu Chen, Jiajia Yang, Yang Tang, Yifei Shang, Jing Shen, Bairong A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies |
title | A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies |
title_full | A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies |
title_fullStr | A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies |
title_short | A Practical Comparison of De Novo Genome Assembly Software Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies |
title_sort | practical comparison of de novo genome assembly software tools for next-generation sequencing technologies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017915 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangwenyu apracticalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT chenjiajia apracticalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT yangyang apracticalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT tangyifei apracticalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT shangjing apracticalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT shenbairong apracticalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT zhangwenyu practicalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT chenjiajia practicalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT yangyang practicalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT tangyifei practicalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT shangjing practicalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies AT shenbairong practicalcomparisonofdenovogenomeassemblysoftwaretoolsfornextgenerationsequencingtechnologies |