Cargando…
Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses is often tricky, and there is only limited advice for authors on what to do. We investigated how authors addressed different degrees of heterogeneity, in particular whether they used a fixed effect model, which assumes that all the included stu...
Autores principales: | Schroll, Jeppe B, Moustgaard, Rasmus, Gøtzsche, Peter C |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21349195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study
por: Bindslev, Julie Bolette Brix, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Challenges in Coding Adverse Events in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Assessment of Adverse Events in Protocols, Clinical Study Reports, and Published Papers of Trials of Orlistat: A Document Analysis
por: Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou, et al.
Publicado: (2016)