Cargando…
Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, have shown antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer as single agents in phase I/II studies. The combination of irinotecan and S-1 (IRI-S) is also active against advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21340666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0009-5 |
_version_ | 1782200258895282176 |
---|---|
author | Narahara, Hiroyuki Iishi, Hiroyasu Imamura, Hiroshi Tsuburaya, Akira Chin, Keisho Imamoto, Haruhiko Esaki, Taito Furukawa, Hiroshi Hamada, Chikuma Sakata, Yuh |
author_facet | Narahara, Hiroyuki Iishi, Hiroyasu Imamura, Hiroshi Tsuburaya, Akira Chin, Keisho Imamoto, Haruhiko Esaki, Taito Furukawa, Hiroshi Hamada, Chikuma Sakata, Yuh |
author_sort | Narahara, Hiroyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, have shown antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer as single agents in phase I/II studies. The combination of irinotecan and S-1 (IRI-S) is also active against advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 28 days every 6 weeks) or oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 21 days every 5 weeks) plus irinotecan (80 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 every 5 weeks) (IRI-S). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included the time to treatment failure, 1- and 2-year survival rates, response rate, and safety. RESULTS: The median survival time with IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy was 12.8 versus 10.5 months (P = 0.233), time to treatment failure was 4.5 versus 3.6 months (P = 0.157), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.0 versus 44.9%, respectively. The response rate was significantly higher for IRI-S than for S-1 monotherapy (41.5 vs. 26.9%, P = 0.035). Neutropenia and diarrhea occurred more frequently with IRI-S, but were manageable. Patients treated with IRI-S received more courses of therapy at a relative dose intensity similar to that of S-1 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although IRI-S achieved longer median survival than S-1 monotherapy and was well tolerated, it did not show significant superiority in this study. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3056989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30569892011-04-05 Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) Narahara, Hiroyuki Iishi, Hiroyasu Imamura, Hiroshi Tsuburaya, Akira Chin, Keisho Imamoto, Haruhiko Esaki, Taito Furukawa, Hiroshi Hamada, Chikuma Sakata, Yuh Gastric Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, have shown antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer as single agents in phase I/II studies. The combination of irinotecan and S-1 (IRI-S) is also active against advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 28 days every 6 weeks) or oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 21 days every 5 weeks) plus irinotecan (80 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 every 5 weeks) (IRI-S). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included the time to treatment failure, 1- and 2-year survival rates, response rate, and safety. RESULTS: The median survival time with IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy was 12.8 versus 10.5 months (P = 0.233), time to treatment failure was 4.5 versus 3.6 months (P = 0.157), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.0 versus 44.9%, respectively. The response rate was significantly higher for IRI-S than for S-1 monotherapy (41.5 vs. 26.9%, P = 0.035). Neutropenia and diarrhea occurred more frequently with IRI-S, but were manageable. Patients treated with IRI-S received more courses of therapy at a relative dose intensity similar to that of S-1 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although IRI-S achieved longer median survival than S-1 monotherapy and was well tolerated, it did not show significant superiority in this study. Springer Japan 2011-02-23 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3056989/ /pubmed/21340666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0009-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Narahara, Hiroyuki Iishi, Hiroyasu Imamura, Hiroshi Tsuburaya, Akira Chin, Keisho Imamoto, Haruhiko Esaki, Taito Furukawa, Hiroshi Hamada, Chikuma Sakata, Yuh Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) |
title | Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) |
title_full | Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) |
title_fullStr | Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) |
title_short | Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) |
title_sort | randomized phase iii study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus s-1 with s-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study gc0301/top-002) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21340666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0009-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naraharahiroyuki randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT iishihiroyasu randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT imamurahiroshi randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT tsuburayaakira randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT chinkeisho randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT imamotoharuhiko randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT esakitaito randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT furukawahiroshi randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT hamadachikuma randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 AT sakatayuh randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002 |