Cargando…

Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, have shown antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer as single agents in phase I/II studies. The combination of irinotecan and S-1 (IRI-S) is also active against advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narahara, Hiroyuki, Iishi, Hiroyasu, Imamura, Hiroshi, Tsuburaya, Akira, Chin, Keisho, Imamoto, Haruhiko, Esaki, Taito, Furukawa, Hiroshi, Hamada, Chikuma, Sakata, Yuh
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21340666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0009-5
_version_ 1782200258895282176
author Narahara, Hiroyuki
Iishi, Hiroyasu
Imamura, Hiroshi
Tsuburaya, Akira
Chin, Keisho
Imamoto, Haruhiko
Esaki, Taito
Furukawa, Hiroshi
Hamada, Chikuma
Sakata, Yuh
author_facet Narahara, Hiroyuki
Iishi, Hiroyasu
Imamura, Hiroshi
Tsuburaya, Akira
Chin, Keisho
Imamoto, Haruhiko
Esaki, Taito
Furukawa, Hiroshi
Hamada, Chikuma
Sakata, Yuh
author_sort Narahara, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, have shown antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer as single agents in phase I/II studies. The combination of irinotecan and S-1 (IRI-S) is also active against advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 28 days every 6 weeks) or oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 21 days every 5 weeks) plus irinotecan (80 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 every 5 weeks) (IRI-S). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included the time to treatment failure, 1- and 2-year survival rates, response rate, and safety. RESULTS: The median survival time with IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy was 12.8 versus 10.5 months (P = 0.233), time to treatment failure was 4.5 versus 3.6 months (P = 0.157), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.0 versus 44.9%, respectively. The response rate was significantly higher for IRI-S than for S-1 monotherapy (41.5 vs. 26.9%, P = 0.035). Neutropenia and diarrhea occurred more frequently with IRI-S, but were manageable. Patients treated with IRI-S received more courses of therapy at a relative dose intensity similar to that of S-1 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although IRI-S achieved longer median survival than S-1 monotherapy and was well tolerated, it did not show significant superiority in this study.
format Text
id pubmed-3056989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30569892011-04-05 Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002) Narahara, Hiroyuki Iishi, Hiroyasu Imamura, Hiroshi Tsuburaya, Akira Chin, Keisho Imamoto, Haruhiko Esaki, Taito Furukawa, Hiroshi Hamada, Chikuma Sakata, Yuh Gastric Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Irinotecan hydrochloride and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, have shown antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer as single agents in phase I/II studies. The combination of irinotecan and S-1 (IRI-S) is also active against advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 28 days every 6 weeks) or oral S-1 (80 mg/m(2) daily for 21 days every 5 weeks) plus irinotecan (80 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 every 5 weeks) (IRI-S). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included the time to treatment failure, 1- and 2-year survival rates, response rate, and safety. RESULTS: The median survival time with IRI-S versus S-1 monotherapy was 12.8 versus 10.5 months (P = 0.233), time to treatment failure was 4.5 versus 3.6 months (P = 0.157), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.0 versus 44.9%, respectively. The response rate was significantly higher for IRI-S than for S-1 monotherapy (41.5 vs. 26.9%, P = 0.035). Neutropenia and diarrhea occurred more frequently with IRI-S, but were manageable. Patients treated with IRI-S received more courses of therapy at a relative dose intensity similar to that of S-1 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although IRI-S achieved longer median survival than S-1 monotherapy and was well tolerated, it did not show significant superiority in this study. Springer Japan 2011-02-23 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3056989/ /pubmed/21340666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0009-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Narahara, Hiroyuki
Iishi, Hiroyasu
Imamura, Hiroshi
Tsuburaya, Akira
Chin, Keisho
Imamoto, Haruhiko
Esaki, Taito
Furukawa, Hiroshi
Hamada, Chikuma
Sakata, Yuh
Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
title Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
title_full Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
title_fullStr Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
title_full_unstemmed Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
title_short Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002)
title_sort randomized phase iii study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus s-1 with s-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study gc0301/top-002)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21340666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0009-5
work_keys_str_mv AT naraharahiroyuki randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT iishihiroyasu randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT imamurahiroshi randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT tsuburayaakira randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT chinkeisho randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT imamotoharuhiko randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT esakitaito randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT furukawahiroshi randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT hamadachikuma randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002
AT sakatayuh randomizedphaseiiistudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofirinotecanpluss1withs1aloneasfirstlinetreatmentforadvancedgastriccancerstudygc0301top002