Cargando…

A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences

The fixed concentration procedure (FCP) has been proposed as an alternative to the median lethal concentration (LC(50)) test (organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) test guideline [TG] 403) for the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity. The FCP tests animals of a single gend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stallard, Nigel, Price, Charlotte, Creton, Stuart, Indans, Ian, Guest, Robert, Griffiths, David, Edwards, Philippa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3057438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20488847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327110370983
_version_ 1782200284175400960
author Stallard, Nigel
Price, Charlotte
Creton, Stuart
Indans, Ian
Guest, Robert
Griffiths, David
Edwards, Philippa
author_facet Stallard, Nigel
Price, Charlotte
Creton, Stuart
Indans, Ian
Guest, Robert
Griffiths, David
Edwards, Philippa
author_sort Stallard, Nigel
collection PubMed
description The fixed concentration procedure (FCP) has been proposed as an alternative to the median lethal concentration (LC(50)) test (organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) test guideline [TG] 403) for the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity. The FCP tests animals of a single gender (usually females) at a number of fixed concentration levels in a sequential fashion. It begins with a sighting study that precedes the main FCP study and is used to determine the main study starting concentration. In this paper, we propose a modification to the sighting study and suggest that it should be conducted using both male and female animals, rather than just animals of a single gender. Statistical analysis demonstrates that, when females are more sensitive, the new procedure is likely to give the same classification as the original FCP, whereas, if males are more sensitive, the new procedure is much less likely to lead to incorrect classification into a less toxic category. If there is no difference in the LC(50) for females and males, the new procedure is slightly more likely to classify into a more stringent class than the original FCP. Overall, these results show that the revised sighting study ensures gender differences in sensitivity do not significantly impact on the performance of the FCP, supporting its use as an alternative test method for assessing acute inhalation toxicity.
format Text
id pubmed-3057438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30574382011-05-10 A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences Stallard, Nigel Price, Charlotte Creton, Stuart Indans, Ian Guest, Robert Griffiths, David Edwards, Philippa Hum Exp Toxicol Article The fixed concentration procedure (FCP) has been proposed as an alternative to the median lethal concentration (LC(50)) test (organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) test guideline [TG] 403) for the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity. The FCP tests animals of a single gender (usually females) at a number of fixed concentration levels in a sequential fashion. It begins with a sighting study that precedes the main FCP study and is used to determine the main study starting concentration. In this paper, we propose a modification to the sighting study and suggest that it should be conducted using both male and female animals, rather than just animals of a single gender. Statistical analysis demonstrates that, when females are more sensitive, the new procedure is likely to give the same classification as the original FCP, whereas, if males are more sensitive, the new procedure is much less likely to lead to incorrect classification into a less toxic category. If there is no difference in the LC(50) for females and males, the new procedure is slightly more likely to classify into a more stringent class than the original FCP. Overall, these results show that the revised sighting study ensures gender differences in sensitivity do not significantly impact on the performance of the FCP, supporting its use as an alternative test method for assessing acute inhalation toxicity. SAGE Publications 2010-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3057438/ /pubmed/20488847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327110370983 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Stallard, Nigel
Price, Charlotte
Creton, Stuart
Indans, Ian
Guest, Robert
Griffiths, David
Edwards, Philippa
A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
title A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
title_full A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
title_fullStr A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
title_full_unstemmed A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
title_short A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
title_sort new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3057438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20488847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327110370983
work_keys_str_mv AT stallardnigel anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT pricecharlotte anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT cretonstuart anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT indansian anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT guestrobert anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT griffithsdavid anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT edwardsphilippa anewsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT stallardnigel newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT pricecharlotte newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT cretonstuart newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT indansian newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT guestrobert newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT griffithsdavid newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences
AT edwardsphilippa newsightingstudyforthefixedconcentrationproceduretoallowforgenderdifferences