Cargando…

Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association of cryptogenic stroke and embolism with patent foramen ovale (PFO), but the question how to prevent further events in such patients is unresolved. Options include antithrombotic treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet agents or surgical or endova...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khattab, Ahmed A, Windecker, Stephan, Jüni, Peter, Hildick-Smith, David, Dudek, Dariusz, Andersen, Henning R, Ibrahim, Reda, Schuler, Gerhard, Walton, Antony S, Wahl, Andreas, Mattle, Heinrich P, Meier, Bernhard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-56
_version_ 1782200324070572032
author Khattab, Ahmed A
Windecker, Stephan
Jüni, Peter
Hildick-Smith, David
Dudek, Dariusz
Andersen, Henning R
Ibrahim, Reda
Schuler, Gerhard
Walton, Antony S
Wahl, Andreas
Mattle, Heinrich P
Meier, Bernhard
author_facet Khattab, Ahmed A
Windecker, Stephan
Jüni, Peter
Hildick-Smith, David
Dudek, Dariusz
Andersen, Henning R
Ibrahim, Reda
Schuler, Gerhard
Walton, Antony S
Wahl, Andreas
Mattle, Heinrich P
Meier, Bernhard
author_sort Khattab, Ahmed A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association of cryptogenic stroke and embolism with patent foramen ovale (PFO), but the question how to prevent further events in such patients is unresolved. Options include antithrombotic treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet agents or surgical or endovascular closure of the PFO. The PC-Trial was set up to compare endovascular closure and best medical treatment for prevention of recurrent events. METHODS: The PC-Trial is a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of percutaneous closure of the PFO using the Amplatzer PFO occluder with best medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism, i.e. mostly cryptogenic stroke. Warfarin for 6 months followed by antiplatelet agents is recommended as medical treatment. Randomization is stratified according to patients age (<45 versus ≥45 years), presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA yes or no) and number of embolic events before randomization (one versus more than one event). Primary endpoints are death, nonfatal stroke and peripheral embolism. DISCUSSION: patients were randomized in 29 centers of Europe, Canada, and Australia. Randomization started February 2000. Enrollment of 414 patients was completed in February 2009. All patients will be followed-up longitudinally. Follow-up is maintained until the last enrolled patient is beyond 2.5 years of follow-up (expected in 2011). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial listed in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00166257 and sponsored by AGA Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA
format Text
id pubmed-3058012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30580122011-03-16 Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design Khattab, Ahmed A Windecker, Stephan Jüni, Peter Hildick-Smith, David Dudek, Dariusz Andersen, Henning R Ibrahim, Reda Schuler, Gerhard Walton, Antony S Wahl, Andreas Mattle, Heinrich P Meier, Bernhard Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association of cryptogenic stroke and embolism with patent foramen ovale (PFO), but the question how to prevent further events in such patients is unresolved. Options include antithrombotic treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet agents or surgical or endovascular closure of the PFO. The PC-Trial was set up to compare endovascular closure and best medical treatment for prevention of recurrent events. METHODS: The PC-Trial is a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of percutaneous closure of the PFO using the Amplatzer PFO occluder with best medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism, i.e. mostly cryptogenic stroke. Warfarin for 6 months followed by antiplatelet agents is recommended as medical treatment. Randomization is stratified according to patients age (<45 versus ≥45 years), presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA yes or no) and number of embolic events before randomization (one versus more than one event). Primary endpoints are death, nonfatal stroke and peripheral embolism. DISCUSSION: patients were randomized in 29 centers of Europe, Canada, and Australia. Randomization started February 2000. Enrollment of 414 patients was completed in February 2009. All patients will be followed-up longitudinally. Follow-up is maintained until the last enrolled patient is beyond 2.5 years of follow-up (expected in 2011). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial listed in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00166257 and sponsored by AGA Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA BioMed Central 2011-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3058012/ /pubmed/21356042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-56 Text en Copyright ©2011 Khattab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Khattab, Ahmed A
Windecker, Stephan
Jüni, Peter
Hildick-Smith, David
Dudek, Dariusz
Andersen, Henning R
Ibrahim, Reda
Schuler, Gerhard
Walton, Antony S
Wahl, Andreas
Mattle, Heinrich P
Meier, Bernhard
Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
title Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
title_full Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
title_fullStr Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
title_full_unstemmed Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
title_short Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
title_sort randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (pfo) using the amplatzer pfo occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (pc-trial): rationale and design
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-56
work_keys_str_mv AT khattabahmeda randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT windeckerstephan randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT junipeter randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT hildicksmithdavid randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT dudekdariusz randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT andersenhenningr randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT ibrahimreda randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT schulergerhard randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT waltonantonys randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT wahlandreas randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT mattleheinrichp randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign
AT meierbernhard randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign