Cargando…
Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association of cryptogenic stroke and embolism with patent foramen ovale (PFO), but the question how to prevent further events in such patients is unresolved. Options include antithrombotic treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet agents or surgical or endova...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-56 |
_version_ | 1782200324070572032 |
---|---|
author | Khattab, Ahmed A Windecker, Stephan Jüni, Peter Hildick-Smith, David Dudek, Dariusz Andersen, Henning R Ibrahim, Reda Schuler, Gerhard Walton, Antony S Wahl, Andreas Mattle, Heinrich P Meier, Bernhard |
author_facet | Khattab, Ahmed A Windecker, Stephan Jüni, Peter Hildick-Smith, David Dudek, Dariusz Andersen, Henning R Ibrahim, Reda Schuler, Gerhard Walton, Antony S Wahl, Andreas Mattle, Heinrich P Meier, Bernhard |
author_sort | Khattab, Ahmed A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association of cryptogenic stroke and embolism with patent foramen ovale (PFO), but the question how to prevent further events in such patients is unresolved. Options include antithrombotic treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet agents or surgical or endovascular closure of the PFO. The PC-Trial was set up to compare endovascular closure and best medical treatment for prevention of recurrent events. METHODS: The PC-Trial is a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of percutaneous closure of the PFO using the Amplatzer PFO occluder with best medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism, i.e. mostly cryptogenic stroke. Warfarin for 6 months followed by antiplatelet agents is recommended as medical treatment. Randomization is stratified according to patients age (<45 versus ≥45 years), presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA yes or no) and number of embolic events before randomization (one versus more than one event). Primary endpoints are death, nonfatal stroke and peripheral embolism. DISCUSSION: patients were randomized in 29 centers of Europe, Canada, and Australia. Randomization started February 2000. Enrollment of 414 patients was completed in February 2009. All patients will be followed-up longitudinally. Follow-up is maintained until the last enrolled patient is beyond 2.5 years of follow-up (expected in 2011). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial listed in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00166257 and sponsored by AGA Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3058012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30580122011-03-16 Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design Khattab, Ahmed A Windecker, Stephan Jüni, Peter Hildick-Smith, David Dudek, Dariusz Andersen, Henning R Ibrahim, Reda Schuler, Gerhard Walton, Antony S Wahl, Andreas Mattle, Heinrich P Meier, Bernhard Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown an association of cryptogenic stroke and embolism with patent foramen ovale (PFO), but the question how to prevent further events in such patients is unresolved. Options include antithrombotic treatment with warfarin or antiplatelet agents or surgical or endovascular closure of the PFO. The PC-Trial was set up to compare endovascular closure and best medical treatment for prevention of recurrent events. METHODS: The PC-Trial is a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of percutaneous closure of the PFO using the Amplatzer PFO occluder with best medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism, i.e. mostly cryptogenic stroke. Warfarin for 6 months followed by antiplatelet agents is recommended as medical treatment. Randomization is stratified according to patients age (<45 versus ≥45 years), presence of atrial septal aneurysm (ASA yes or no) and number of embolic events before randomization (one versus more than one event). Primary endpoints are death, nonfatal stroke and peripheral embolism. DISCUSSION: patients were randomized in 29 centers of Europe, Canada, and Australia. Randomization started February 2000. Enrollment of 414 patients was completed in February 2009. All patients will be followed-up longitudinally. Follow-up is maintained until the last enrolled patient is beyond 2.5 years of follow-up (expected in 2011). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial listed in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00166257 and sponsored by AGA Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA BioMed Central 2011-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3058012/ /pubmed/21356042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-56 Text en Copyright ©2011 Khattab et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Khattab, Ahmed A Windecker, Stephan Jüni, Peter Hildick-Smith, David Dudek, Dariusz Andersen, Henning R Ibrahim, Reda Schuler, Gerhard Walton, Antony S Wahl, Andreas Mattle, Heinrich P Meier, Bernhard Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design |
title | Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design |
title_full | Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design |
title_fullStr | Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design |
title_short | Randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (PC-Trial): rationale and design |
title_sort | randomized clinical trial comparing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (pfo) using the amplatzer pfo occluder with medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic embolism (pc-trial): rationale and design |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21356042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-56 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khattabahmeda randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT windeckerstephan randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT junipeter randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT hildicksmithdavid randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT dudekdariusz randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT andersenhenningr randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT ibrahimreda randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT schulergerhard randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT waltonantonys randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT wahlandreas randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT mattleheinrichp randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign AT meierbernhard randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingpercutaneousclosureofpatentforamenovalepfousingtheamplatzerpfooccluderwithmedicaltreatmentinpatientswithcryptogenicembolismpctrialrationaleanddesign |