Cargando…

Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies

BACKGROUND: Headaches are more frequent in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) than healthy control (HC) subjects. The 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to define CFS headache phenotypes. METHODS: Subjects in Cohort 1 (HC = 368; CFS = 203) completed questionnaires about many di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ravindran, Murugan K, Zheng, Yin, Timbol, Christian, Merck, Samantha J, Baraniuk, James N
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21375763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-30
_version_ 1782200327797211136
author Ravindran, Murugan K
Zheng, Yin
Timbol, Christian
Merck, Samantha J
Baraniuk, James N
author_facet Ravindran, Murugan K
Zheng, Yin
Timbol, Christian
Merck, Samantha J
Baraniuk, James N
author_sort Ravindran, Murugan K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Headaches are more frequent in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) than healthy control (HC) subjects. The 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to define CFS headache phenotypes. METHODS: Subjects in Cohort 1 (HC = 368; CFS = 203) completed questionnaires about many diverse symptoms by giving nominal (yes/no) answers. Cohort 2 (HC = 21; CFS = 67) had more focused evaluations. They scored symptom severities on 0 to 4 anchored ordinal scales, and had structured headache evaluations. All subjects had history and physical examinations; assessments for exclusion criteria; questionnaires about CFS related symptoms (0 to 4 scale), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 (MOS SF-36). RESULTS: Demographics, trends for the number of diffuse "functional" symptoms present, and severity of CFS case designation criteria symptoms were equivalent between CFS subjects in Cohorts 1 and 2. HC had significantly fewer symptoms, lower MFI and higher SF-36 domain scores than CFS in both cohorts. Migraine headaches were found in 84%, and tension-type headaches in 81% of Cohort 2 CFS. This compared to 5% and 45%, respectively, in HC. The CFS group had migraine without aura (60%; MO; CFS+MO), with aura (24%; CFS+MA), tension headaches only (12%), or no headaches (4%). Co-morbid tension and migraine headaches were found in 67% of CFS. CFS+MA had higher severity scores than CFS+MO for the sum of scores for poor memory, dizziness, balance, and numbness ("Neuro-construct", p = 0.002) and perceived heart rhythm disturbances, palpitations and noncardiac chest pain ("Cardio-construct"; p = 0.045, t-tests after Bonferroni corrections). CFS+MO subjects had lower pressure-induced pain thresholds (2.36 kg [1.95-2.78; 95% C.I.] n = 40) and a higher prevalence of fibromyalgia (47%; 1990 criteria) compared to HC (5.23 kg [3.95-6.52] n = 20; and 0%, respectively). Sumatriptan was beneficial for 13 out of 14 newly diagnosed CFS migraine subjects. CONCLUSIONS: CFS subjects had higher prevalences of MO and MA than HC, suggesting that mechanisms of migraine pathogenesis such as central sensitization may contribute to CFS pathophysiology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Georgetown University IRB # 2006-481 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00810329
format Text
id pubmed-3058027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30580272011-03-16 Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies Ravindran, Murugan K Zheng, Yin Timbol, Christian Merck, Samantha J Baraniuk, James N BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Headaches are more frequent in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) than healthy control (HC) subjects. The 2004 International Headache Society (IHS) criteria were used to define CFS headache phenotypes. METHODS: Subjects in Cohort 1 (HC = 368; CFS = 203) completed questionnaires about many diverse symptoms by giving nominal (yes/no) answers. Cohort 2 (HC = 21; CFS = 67) had more focused evaluations. They scored symptom severities on 0 to 4 anchored ordinal scales, and had structured headache evaluations. All subjects had history and physical examinations; assessments for exclusion criteria; questionnaires about CFS related symptoms (0 to 4 scale), Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 (MOS SF-36). RESULTS: Demographics, trends for the number of diffuse "functional" symptoms present, and severity of CFS case designation criteria symptoms were equivalent between CFS subjects in Cohorts 1 and 2. HC had significantly fewer symptoms, lower MFI and higher SF-36 domain scores than CFS in both cohorts. Migraine headaches were found in 84%, and tension-type headaches in 81% of Cohort 2 CFS. This compared to 5% and 45%, respectively, in HC. The CFS group had migraine without aura (60%; MO; CFS+MO), with aura (24%; CFS+MA), tension headaches only (12%), or no headaches (4%). Co-morbid tension and migraine headaches were found in 67% of CFS. CFS+MA had higher severity scores than CFS+MO for the sum of scores for poor memory, dizziness, balance, and numbness ("Neuro-construct", p = 0.002) and perceived heart rhythm disturbances, palpitations and noncardiac chest pain ("Cardio-construct"; p = 0.045, t-tests after Bonferroni corrections). CFS+MO subjects had lower pressure-induced pain thresholds (2.36 kg [1.95-2.78; 95% C.I.] n = 40) and a higher prevalence of fibromyalgia (47%; 1990 criteria) compared to HC (5.23 kg [3.95-6.52] n = 20; and 0%, respectively). Sumatriptan was beneficial for 13 out of 14 newly diagnosed CFS migraine subjects. CONCLUSIONS: CFS subjects had higher prevalences of MO and MA than HC, suggesting that mechanisms of migraine pathogenesis such as central sensitization may contribute to CFS pathophysiology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Georgetown University IRB # 2006-481 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00810329 BioMed Central 2011-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3058027/ /pubmed/21375763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-30 Text en Copyright ©2011 Ravindran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ravindran, Murugan K
Zheng, Yin
Timbol, Christian
Merck, Samantha J
Baraniuk, James N
Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
title Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
title_full Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
title_fullStr Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
title_full_unstemmed Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
title_short Migraine headaches in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS): Comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
title_sort migraine headaches in chronic fatigue syndrome (cfs): comparison of two prospective cross-sectional studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21375763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-30
work_keys_str_mv AT ravindranmurugank migraineheadachesinchronicfatiguesyndromecfscomparisonoftwoprospectivecrosssectionalstudies
AT zhengyin migraineheadachesinchronicfatiguesyndromecfscomparisonoftwoprospectivecrosssectionalstudies
AT timbolchristian migraineheadachesinchronicfatiguesyndromecfscomparisonoftwoprospectivecrosssectionalstudies
AT mercksamanthaj migraineheadachesinchronicfatiguesyndromecfscomparisonoftwoprospectivecrosssectionalstudies
AT baraniukjamesn migraineheadachesinchronicfatiguesyndromecfscomparisonoftwoprospectivecrosssectionalstudies