Cargando…

Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study

In the study of neural circuits, it becomes essential to discern the different neuronal cell types that build the circuit. Traditionally, neuronal cell types have been classified using qualitative descriptors. More recently, several attempts have been made to classify neurons quantitatively, using u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guerra, Luis, McGarry, Laura M, Robles, Víctor, Bielza, Concha, Larrañaga, Pedro, Yuste, Rafael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21154911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20809
_version_ 1782200385316847616
author Guerra, Luis
McGarry, Laura M
Robles, Víctor
Bielza, Concha
Larrañaga, Pedro
Yuste, Rafael
author_facet Guerra, Luis
McGarry, Laura M
Robles, Víctor
Bielza, Concha
Larrañaga, Pedro
Yuste, Rafael
author_sort Guerra, Luis
collection PubMed
description In the study of neural circuits, it becomes essential to discern the different neuronal cell types that build the circuit. Traditionally, neuronal cell types have been classified using qualitative descriptors. More recently, several attempts have been made to classify neurons quantitatively, using unsupervised clustering methods. While useful, these algorithms do not take advantage of previous information known to the investigator, which could improve the classification task. For neocortical GABAergic interneurons, the problem to discern among different cell types is particularly difficult and better methods are needed to perform objective classifications. Here we explore the use of supervised classification algorithms to classify neurons based on their morphological features, using a database of 128 pyramidal cells and 199 interneurons from mouse neocortex. To evaluate the performance of different algorithms we used, as a “benchmark,” the test to automatically distinguish between pyramidal cells and interneurons, defining “ground truth” by the presence or absence of an apical dendrite. We compared hierarchical clustering with a battery of different supervised classification algorithms, finding that supervised classifications outperformed hierarchical clustering. In addition, the selection of subsets of distinguishing features enhanced the classification accuracy for both sets of algorithms. The analysis of selected variables indicates that dendritic features were most useful to distinguish pyramidal cells from interneurons when compared with somatic and axonal morphological variables. We conclude that supervised classification algorithms are better matched to the general problem of distinguishing neuronal cell types when some information on these cell groups, in our case being pyramidal or interneuron, is known a priori. As a spin-off of this methodological study, we provide several methods to automatically distinguish neocortical pyramidal cells from interneurons, based on their morphologies. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 71: 71–82, 2011
format Text
id pubmed-3058840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30588402011-07-01 Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study Guerra, Luis McGarry, Laura M Robles, Víctor Bielza, Concha Larrañaga, Pedro Yuste, Rafael Dev Neurobiol Diversity In the study of neural circuits, it becomes essential to discern the different neuronal cell types that build the circuit. Traditionally, neuronal cell types have been classified using qualitative descriptors. More recently, several attempts have been made to classify neurons quantitatively, using unsupervised clustering methods. While useful, these algorithms do not take advantage of previous information known to the investigator, which could improve the classification task. For neocortical GABAergic interneurons, the problem to discern among different cell types is particularly difficult and better methods are needed to perform objective classifications. Here we explore the use of supervised classification algorithms to classify neurons based on their morphological features, using a database of 128 pyramidal cells and 199 interneurons from mouse neocortex. To evaluate the performance of different algorithms we used, as a “benchmark,” the test to automatically distinguish between pyramidal cells and interneurons, defining “ground truth” by the presence or absence of an apical dendrite. We compared hierarchical clustering with a battery of different supervised classification algorithms, finding that supervised classifications outperformed hierarchical clustering. In addition, the selection of subsets of distinguishing features enhanced the classification accuracy for both sets of algorithms. The analysis of selected variables indicates that dendritic features were most useful to distinguish pyramidal cells from interneurons when compared with somatic and axonal morphological variables. We conclude that supervised classification algorithms are better matched to the general problem of distinguishing neuronal cell types when some information on these cell groups, in our case being pyramidal or interneuron, is known a priori. As a spin-off of this methodological study, we provide several methods to automatically distinguish neocortical pyramidal cells from interneurons, based on their morphologies. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 71: 71–82, 2011 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 2011-01-01 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3058840/ /pubmed/21154911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20809 Text en Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Diversity
Guerra, Luis
McGarry, Laura M
Robles, Víctor
Bielza, Concha
Larrañaga, Pedro
Yuste, Rafael
Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study
title Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study
title_full Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study
title_fullStr Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study
title_short Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study
title_sort comparison between supervised and unsupervised classifications of neuronal cell types: a case study
topic Diversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3058840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21154911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20809
work_keys_str_mv AT guerraluis comparisonbetweensupervisedandunsupervisedclassificationsofneuronalcelltypesacasestudy
AT mcgarrylauram comparisonbetweensupervisedandunsupervisedclassificationsofneuronalcelltypesacasestudy
AT roblesvictor comparisonbetweensupervisedandunsupervisedclassificationsofneuronalcelltypesacasestudy
AT bielzaconcha comparisonbetweensupervisedandunsupervisedclassificationsofneuronalcelltypesacasestudy
AT larranagapedro comparisonbetweensupervisedandunsupervisedclassificationsofneuronalcelltypesacasestudy
AT yusterafael comparisonbetweensupervisedandunsupervisedclassificationsofneuronalcelltypesacasestudy