Cargando…

Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses

BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) sampling has been considered an inventive and novel method for the isolation of respiratory viruses. METHODS: In our study, 102 volunteers experiencing upper airway infection were recruited over the winter and early spring of 2008/2009 and the first half o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houspie, Lieselot, De Coster, Sarah, Keyaerts, Els, Narongsack, Phouthalack, De Roy, Rikka, Talboom, Ive, Sisk, Maura, Maes, Piet, Verbeeck, Jannick, Van Ranst, Marc
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21375748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-98
_version_ 1782200399935045632
author Houspie, Lieselot
De Coster, Sarah
Keyaerts, Els
Narongsack, Phouthalack
De Roy, Rikka
Talboom, Ive
Sisk, Maura
Maes, Piet
Verbeeck, Jannick
Van Ranst, Marc
author_facet Houspie, Lieselot
De Coster, Sarah
Keyaerts, Els
Narongsack, Phouthalack
De Roy, Rikka
Talboom, Ive
Sisk, Maura
Maes, Piet
Verbeeck, Jannick
Van Ranst, Marc
author_sort Houspie, Lieselot
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) sampling has been considered an inventive and novel method for the isolation of respiratory viruses. METHODS: In our study, 102 volunteers experiencing upper airway infection were recruited over the winter and early spring of 2008/2009 and the first half of the winter of 2009/2010. Ninety-nine EBCs were successfully obtained and screened for 14 commonly circulating respiratory viruses. To investigate the efficiency of virus isolation from EBC, a nasal swab was taken in parallel from a subset of volunteers. The combined use of the ECoVent device with the RTube™ allowed the registration of the exhaled volume and breathing frequency during collection. In this way, the number of exhaled viral particles per liter air or per minute can theoretically be estimated. RESULTS: Viral screening resulted in the detection of 4 different viruses in EBC and/or nasal swabs: Rhinovirus, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus B, Influenza A and Influenza B. Rhinovirus was detected in 6 EBCs and 1 EBC was Influenza B positive. We report a viral detection rate of 7% for the EBCs, which is much lower than the detection rate of 46.8% observed using nasal swabs. CONCLUSION: Although very promising, EBC collection using the RTube™ is not reliable for diagnosis of respiratory infections.
format Text
id pubmed-3059288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30592882011-03-17 Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses Houspie, Lieselot De Coster, Sarah Keyaerts, Els Narongsack, Phouthalack De Roy, Rikka Talboom, Ive Sisk, Maura Maes, Piet Verbeeck, Jannick Van Ranst, Marc Virol J Research BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) sampling has been considered an inventive and novel method for the isolation of respiratory viruses. METHODS: In our study, 102 volunteers experiencing upper airway infection were recruited over the winter and early spring of 2008/2009 and the first half of the winter of 2009/2010. Ninety-nine EBCs were successfully obtained and screened for 14 commonly circulating respiratory viruses. To investigate the efficiency of virus isolation from EBC, a nasal swab was taken in parallel from a subset of volunteers. The combined use of the ECoVent device with the RTube™ allowed the registration of the exhaled volume and breathing frequency during collection. In this way, the number of exhaled viral particles per liter air or per minute can theoretically be estimated. RESULTS: Viral screening resulted in the detection of 4 different viruses in EBC and/or nasal swabs: Rhinovirus, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus B, Influenza A and Influenza B. Rhinovirus was detected in 6 EBCs and 1 EBC was Influenza B positive. We report a viral detection rate of 7% for the EBCs, which is much lower than the detection rate of 46.8% observed using nasal swabs. CONCLUSION: Although very promising, EBC collection using the RTube™ is not reliable for diagnosis of respiratory infections. BioMed Central 2011-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3059288/ /pubmed/21375748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-98 Text en Copyright ©2011 Houspie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Houspie, Lieselot
De Coster, Sarah
Keyaerts, Els
Narongsack, Phouthalack
De Roy, Rikka
Talboom, Ive
Sisk, Maura
Maes, Piet
Verbeeck, Jannick
Van Ranst, Marc
Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
title Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
title_full Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
title_fullStr Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
title_full_unstemmed Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
title_short Exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
title_sort exhaled breath condensate sampling is not a new method for detection of respiratory viruses
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21375748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-98
work_keys_str_mv AT houspielieselot exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT decostersarah exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT keyaertsels exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT narongsackphouthalack exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT deroyrikka exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT talboomive exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT siskmaura exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT maespiet exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT verbeeckjannick exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses
AT vanranstmarc exhaledbreathcondensatesamplingisnotanewmethodfordetectionofrespiratoryviruses