Cargando…
A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is considered as an ubiquitous rule for associative plasticity in cortical networks in vitro. However, limited supporting evidence for its functional role has been provided in vivo. In particular, there are very few studies demonstrating the co-occurrence of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147 |
_version_ | 1782200434962726912 |
---|---|
author | Frégnac, Yves Pananceau, Marc René, Alice Huguet, Nazyed Marre, Olivier Levy, Manuel Shulz, Daniel E. |
author_facet | Frégnac, Yves Pananceau, Marc René, Alice Huguet, Nazyed Marre, Olivier Levy, Manuel Shulz, Daniel E. |
author_sort | Frégnac, Yves |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is considered as an ubiquitous rule for associative plasticity in cortical networks in vitro. However, limited supporting evidence for its functional role has been provided in vivo. In particular, there are very few studies demonstrating the co-occurrence of synaptic efficiency changes and alteration of sensory responses in adult cortex during Hebbian or STDP protocols. We addressed this issue by reviewing and comparing the functional effects of two types of cellular conditioning in cat visual cortex. The first one, referred to as the “covariance” protocol, obeys a generalized Hebbian framework, by imposing, for different stimuli, supervised positive and negative changes in covariance between postsynaptic and presynaptic activity rates. The second protocol, based on intracellular recordings, replicated in vivo variants of the theta-burst paradigm (TBS), proven successful in inducing long-term potentiation in vitro. Since it was shown to impose a precise correlation delay between the electrically activated thalamic input and the TBS-induced postsynaptic spike, this protocol can be seen as a probe of causal (“pre-before-post”) STDP. By choosing a thalamic region where the visual field representation was in retinotopic overlap with the intracellularly recorded cortical receptive field as the afferent site for supervised electrical stimulation, this protocol allowed to look for possible correlates between STDP and functional reorganization of the conditioned cortical receptive field. The rate-based “covariance protocol” induced significant and large amplitude changes in receptive field properties, in both kitten and adult V1 cortex. The TBS STDP-like protocol produced in the adult significant changes in the synaptic gain of the electrically activated thalamic pathway, but the statistical significance of the functional correlates was detectable mostly at the population level. Comparison of our observations with the literature leads us to re-examine the experimental status of spike timing-dependent potentiation in adult cortex. We propose the existence of a correlation-based threshold in vivo, limiting the expression of STDP-induced changes outside the critical period, and which accounts for the stability of synaptic weights during sensory cortical processing in the absence of attention or reward-gated supervision. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3059677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30596772011-03-21 A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo Frégnac, Yves Pananceau, Marc René, Alice Huguet, Nazyed Marre, Olivier Levy, Manuel Shulz, Daniel E. Front Synaptic Neurosci Neuroscience Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is considered as an ubiquitous rule for associative plasticity in cortical networks in vitro. However, limited supporting evidence for its functional role has been provided in vivo. In particular, there are very few studies demonstrating the co-occurrence of synaptic efficiency changes and alteration of sensory responses in adult cortex during Hebbian or STDP protocols. We addressed this issue by reviewing and comparing the functional effects of two types of cellular conditioning in cat visual cortex. The first one, referred to as the “covariance” protocol, obeys a generalized Hebbian framework, by imposing, for different stimuli, supervised positive and negative changes in covariance between postsynaptic and presynaptic activity rates. The second protocol, based on intracellular recordings, replicated in vivo variants of the theta-burst paradigm (TBS), proven successful in inducing long-term potentiation in vitro. Since it was shown to impose a precise correlation delay between the electrically activated thalamic input and the TBS-induced postsynaptic spike, this protocol can be seen as a probe of causal (“pre-before-post”) STDP. By choosing a thalamic region where the visual field representation was in retinotopic overlap with the intracellularly recorded cortical receptive field as the afferent site for supervised electrical stimulation, this protocol allowed to look for possible correlates between STDP and functional reorganization of the conditioned cortical receptive field. The rate-based “covariance protocol” induced significant and large amplitude changes in receptive field properties, in both kitten and adult V1 cortex. The TBS STDP-like protocol produced in the adult significant changes in the synaptic gain of the electrically activated thalamic pathway, but the statistical significance of the functional correlates was detectable mostly at the population level. Comparison of our observations with the literature leads us to re-examine the experimental status of spike timing-dependent potentiation in adult cortex. We propose the existence of a correlation-based threshold in vivo, limiting the expression of STDP-induced changes outside the critical period, and which accounts for the stability of synaptic weights during sensory cortical processing in the absence of attention or reward-gated supervision. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3059677/ /pubmed/21423533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147 Text en Copyright © 2010 Frégnac, Pananceau, René, Huguet, Marre, Levy and Shulz. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Frégnac, Yves Pananceau, Marc René, Alice Huguet, Nazyed Marre, Olivier Levy, Manuel Shulz, Daniel E. A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo |
title | A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo |
title_full | A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo |
title_fullStr | A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo |
title_short | A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo |
title_sort | re-examination of hebbian-covariance rules and spike timing-dependent plasticity in cat visual cortex in vivo |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fregnacyves areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT pananceaumarc areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT renealice areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT huguetnazyed areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT marreolivier areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT levymanuel areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT shulzdaniele areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT fregnacyves reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT pananceaumarc reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT renealice reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT huguetnazyed reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT marreolivier reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT levymanuel reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo AT shulzdaniele reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo |