Cargando…

A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo

Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is considered as an ubiquitous rule for associative plasticity in cortical networks in vitro. However, limited supporting evidence for its functional role has been provided in vivo. In particular, there are very few studies demonstrating the co-occurrence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frégnac, Yves, Pananceau, Marc, René, Alice, Huguet, Nazyed, Marre, Olivier, Levy, Manuel, Shulz, Daniel E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147
_version_ 1782200434962726912
author Frégnac, Yves
Pananceau, Marc
René, Alice
Huguet, Nazyed
Marre, Olivier
Levy, Manuel
Shulz, Daniel E.
author_facet Frégnac, Yves
Pananceau, Marc
René, Alice
Huguet, Nazyed
Marre, Olivier
Levy, Manuel
Shulz, Daniel E.
author_sort Frégnac, Yves
collection PubMed
description Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is considered as an ubiquitous rule for associative plasticity in cortical networks in vitro. However, limited supporting evidence for its functional role has been provided in vivo. In particular, there are very few studies demonstrating the co-occurrence of synaptic efficiency changes and alteration of sensory responses in adult cortex during Hebbian or STDP protocols. We addressed this issue by reviewing and comparing the functional effects of two types of cellular conditioning in cat visual cortex. The first one, referred to as the “covariance” protocol, obeys a generalized Hebbian framework, by imposing, for different stimuli, supervised positive and negative changes in covariance between postsynaptic and presynaptic activity rates. The second protocol, based on intracellular recordings, replicated in vivo variants of the theta-burst paradigm (TBS), proven successful in inducing long-term potentiation in vitro. Since it was shown to impose a precise correlation delay between the electrically activated thalamic input and the TBS-induced postsynaptic spike, this protocol can be seen as a probe of causal (“pre-before-post”) STDP. By choosing a thalamic region where the visual field representation was in retinotopic overlap with the intracellularly recorded cortical receptive field as the afferent site for supervised electrical stimulation, this protocol allowed to look for possible correlates between STDP and functional reorganization of the conditioned cortical receptive field. The rate-based “covariance protocol” induced significant and large amplitude changes in receptive field properties, in both kitten and adult V1 cortex. The TBS STDP-like protocol produced in the adult significant changes in the synaptic gain of the electrically activated thalamic pathway, but the statistical significance of the functional correlates was detectable mostly at the population level. Comparison of our observations with the literature leads us to re-examine the experimental status of spike timing-dependent potentiation in adult cortex. We propose the existence of a correlation-based threshold in vivo, limiting the expression of STDP-induced changes outside the critical period, and which accounts for the stability of synaptic weights during sensory cortical processing in the absence of attention or reward-gated supervision.
format Text
id pubmed-3059677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30596772011-03-21 A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo Frégnac, Yves Pananceau, Marc René, Alice Huguet, Nazyed Marre, Olivier Levy, Manuel Shulz, Daniel E. Front Synaptic Neurosci Neuroscience Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is considered as an ubiquitous rule for associative plasticity in cortical networks in vitro. However, limited supporting evidence for its functional role has been provided in vivo. In particular, there are very few studies demonstrating the co-occurrence of synaptic efficiency changes and alteration of sensory responses in adult cortex during Hebbian or STDP protocols. We addressed this issue by reviewing and comparing the functional effects of two types of cellular conditioning in cat visual cortex. The first one, referred to as the “covariance” protocol, obeys a generalized Hebbian framework, by imposing, for different stimuli, supervised positive and negative changes in covariance between postsynaptic and presynaptic activity rates. The second protocol, based on intracellular recordings, replicated in vivo variants of the theta-burst paradigm (TBS), proven successful in inducing long-term potentiation in vitro. Since it was shown to impose a precise correlation delay between the electrically activated thalamic input and the TBS-induced postsynaptic spike, this protocol can be seen as a probe of causal (“pre-before-post”) STDP. By choosing a thalamic region where the visual field representation was in retinotopic overlap with the intracellularly recorded cortical receptive field as the afferent site for supervised electrical stimulation, this protocol allowed to look for possible correlates between STDP and functional reorganization of the conditioned cortical receptive field. The rate-based “covariance protocol” induced significant and large amplitude changes in receptive field properties, in both kitten and adult V1 cortex. The TBS STDP-like protocol produced in the adult significant changes in the synaptic gain of the electrically activated thalamic pathway, but the statistical significance of the functional correlates was detectable mostly at the population level. Comparison of our observations with the literature leads us to re-examine the experimental status of spike timing-dependent potentiation in adult cortex. We propose the existence of a correlation-based threshold in vivo, limiting the expression of STDP-induced changes outside the critical period, and which accounts for the stability of synaptic weights during sensory cortical processing in the absence of attention or reward-gated supervision. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3059677/ /pubmed/21423533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147 Text en Copyright © 2010 Frégnac, Pananceau, René, Huguet, Marre, Levy and Shulz. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Frégnac, Yves
Pananceau, Marc
René, Alice
Huguet, Nazyed
Marre, Olivier
Levy, Manuel
Shulz, Daniel E.
A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
title A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
title_full A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
title_fullStr A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
title_full_unstemmed A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
title_short A Re-Examination of Hebbian-Covariance Rules and Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cat Visual Cortex in vivo
title_sort re-examination of hebbian-covariance rules and spike timing-dependent plasticity in cat visual cortex in vivo
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423533
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2010.00147
work_keys_str_mv AT fregnacyves areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT pananceaumarc areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT renealice areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT huguetnazyed areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT marreolivier areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT levymanuel areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT shulzdaniele areexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT fregnacyves reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT pananceaumarc reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT renealice reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT huguetnazyed reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT marreolivier reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT levymanuel reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo
AT shulzdaniele reexaminationofhebbiancovariancerulesandspiketimingdependentplasticityincatvisualcortexinvivo