Cargando…

Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization

Sodium channel blockers are associated with arrhythmic sudden death, although they are considered antiarrhythmic agents. The mechanism of these opposing effects is unknown. We used a model of induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) based on selective perfusion of the vascular beds of isolated por...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coronel, Ruben, Wilms-Schopman, Francien J. G., Janse, Michiel J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2010.00010
_version_ 1782200462286520320
author Coronel, Ruben
Wilms-Schopman, Francien J. G.
Janse, Michiel J.
author_facet Coronel, Ruben
Wilms-Schopman, Francien J. G.
Janse, Michiel J.
author_sort Coronel, Ruben
collection PubMed
description Sodium channel blockers are associated with arrhythmic sudden death, although they are considered antiarrhythmic agents. The mechanism of these opposing effects is unknown. We used a model of induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) based on selective perfusion of the vascular beds of isolated porcine hearts (n = 8). One bed was perfused with sotalol (220 μM), the adjacent bed with pinacidil (80 μM), leading to repolarization heterogeneity (late repolarization in the sotalol-, early in the pinacidil-area). Premature stimulation from the area with the short action potential was performed. Epicardial activation/repolarization mapping was done. In three of the eight hearts VF was inducible prior to infusion of flecainide. In those hearts the Fibrillation Factor (FF), the interval between the earliest repolarization of the premature beat (S2) in the early repolarizing (pinacidil) domain, and the last S2-activation in the late repolarizing (sotalol) domain, was significantly shorter than in the hearts without VF (33 ± 22 vs 93 ± 11 ms, m ± SEM, p < 0.05). In the three hearts with VF flecainide was infused in the pinacidil domain after defibrillation. This led to shortening of the line of block, local delay of S2 activation and repolarization, an increase in FF and failure to induce VF. In the five hearts without VF, flecainide was subsequently infused in the sotalol domain. This led to a local delay of S2 activation, a shortening of FF (by 47 ± 3 ms) and successful induction of VF in three hearts. In the two remaining hearts FF did not decrease enough (maximally 13 ms) to allow re-entry. Sodium channel blockade applied to myocardium with a short refractory period is antifibrillatory whereas sodium channel blockade of myocardium with a long refractory period is profibrillatory. Our study provides a mechanistic basis for pro- and antiarrhythmic effects of sodium channel blockers in the absence of structural heart disease.
format Text
id pubmed-3059930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30599302011-03-21 Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization Coronel, Ruben Wilms-Schopman, Francien J. G. Janse, Michiel J. Front Physiol Physiology Sodium channel blockers are associated with arrhythmic sudden death, although they are considered antiarrhythmic agents. The mechanism of these opposing effects is unknown. We used a model of induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) based on selective perfusion of the vascular beds of isolated porcine hearts (n = 8). One bed was perfused with sotalol (220 μM), the adjacent bed with pinacidil (80 μM), leading to repolarization heterogeneity (late repolarization in the sotalol-, early in the pinacidil-area). Premature stimulation from the area with the short action potential was performed. Epicardial activation/repolarization mapping was done. In three of the eight hearts VF was inducible prior to infusion of flecainide. In those hearts the Fibrillation Factor (FF), the interval between the earliest repolarization of the premature beat (S2) in the early repolarizing (pinacidil) domain, and the last S2-activation in the late repolarizing (sotalol) domain, was significantly shorter than in the hearts without VF (33 ± 22 vs 93 ± 11 ms, m ± SEM, p < 0.05). In the three hearts with VF flecainide was infused in the pinacidil domain after defibrillation. This led to shortening of the line of block, local delay of S2 activation and repolarization, an increase in FF and failure to induce VF. In the five hearts without VF, flecainide was subsequently infused in the sotalol domain. This led to a local delay of S2 activation, a shortening of FF (by 47 ± 3 ms) and successful induction of VF in three hearts. In the two remaining hearts FF did not decrease enough (maximally 13 ms) to allow re-entry. Sodium channel blockade applied to myocardium with a short refractory period is antifibrillatory whereas sodium channel blockade of myocardium with a long refractory period is profibrillatory. Our study provides a mechanistic basis for pro- and antiarrhythmic effects of sodium channel blockers in the absence of structural heart disease. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3059930/ /pubmed/21423353 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2010.00010 Text en Copyright © 2010 Coronel, Wilms-Schopman and Janse. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Physiology
Coronel, Ruben
Wilms-Schopman, Francien J. G.
Janse, Michiel J.
Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
title Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
title_full Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
title_fullStr Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
title_full_unstemmed Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
title_short Anti- or Profibrillatory Effects of Na(+) Channel Blockade Depend on the Site of Application Relative to Gradients in Repolarization
title_sort anti- or profibrillatory effects of na(+) channel blockade depend on the site of application relative to gradients in repolarization
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21423353
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2010.00010
work_keys_str_mv AT coronelruben antiorprofibrillatoryeffectsofnachannelblockadedependonthesiteofapplicationrelativetogradientsinrepolarization
AT wilmsschopmanfrancienjg antiorprofibrillatoryeffectsofnachannelblockadedependonthesiteofapplicationrelativetogradientsinrepolarization
AT jansemichielj antiorprofibrillatoryeffectsofnachannelblockadedependonthesiteofapplicationrelativetogradientsinrepolarization