Cargando…

Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, various measures of entropy have been used to examine the complexity of human postural control. In general, entropy measures provide information regarding the health, stability and adaptability of the postural system that is not captured when using more traditi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhea, Christopher K., Silver, Tobin A., Hong, S. Lee, Ryu, Joong Hyun, Studenka, Breanna E., Hughes, Charmayne M. L., Haddad, Jeffrey M.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017696
_version_ 1782200490448125952
author Rhea, Christopher K.
Silver, Tobin A.
Hong, S. Lee
Ryu, Joong Hyun
Studenka, Breanna E.
Hughes, Charmayne M. L.
Haddad, Jeffrey M.
author_facet Rhea, Christopher K.
Silver, Tobin A.
Hong, S. Lee
Ryu, Joong Hyun
Studenka, Breanna E.
Hughes, Charmayne M. L.
Haddad, Jeffrey M.
author_sort Rhea, Christopher K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, various measures of entropy have been used to examine the complexity of human postural control. In general, entropy measures provide information regarding the health, stability and adaptability of the postural system that is not captured when using more traditional analytical techniques. The purpose of this study was to examine how noise, sampling frequency and time series length influence various measures of entropy when applied to human center of pressure (CoP) data, as well as in synthetic signals with known properties. Such a comparison is necessary to interpret data between and within studies that use different entropy measures, equipment, sampling frequencies or data collection durations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The complexity of synthetic signals with known properties and standing CoP data was calculated using Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Sample Entropy (SampEn) and Recurrence Quantification Analysis Entropy (RQAEn). All signals were examined at varying sampling frequencies and with varying amounts of added noise. Additionally, an increment time series of the original CoP data was examined to remove long-range correlations. Of the three measures examined, ApEn was the least robust to sampling frequency and noise manipulations. Additionally, increased noise led to an increase in SampEn, but a decrease in RQAEn. Thus, noise can yield inconsistent results between the various entropy measures. Finally, the differences between the entropy measures were minimized in the increment CoP data, suggesting that long-range correlations should be removed from CoP data prior to calculating entropy. CONCLUSIONS: The various algorithms typically used to quantify the complexity (entropy) of CoP may yield very different results, particularly when sampling frequency and noise are different. The results of this study are discussed within the context of the neural noise and loss of complexity hypotheses.
format Text
id pubmed-3060087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30600872011-03-23 Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy Rhea, Christopher K. Silver, Tobin A. Hong, S. Lee Ryu, Joong Hyun Studenka, Breanna E. Hughes, Charmayne M. L. Haddad, Jeffrey M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, various measures of entropy have been used to examine the complexity of human postural control. In general, entropy measures provide information regarding the health, stability and adaptability of the postural system that is not captured when using more traditional analytical techniques. The purpose of this study was to examine how noise, sampling frequency and time series length influence various measures of entropy when applied to human center of pressure (CoP) data, as well as in synthetic signals with known properties. Such a comparison is necessary to interpret data between and within studies that use different entropy measures, equipment, sampling frequencies or data collection durations. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The complexity of synthetic signals with known properties and standing CoP data was calculated using Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Sample Entropy (SampEn) and Recurrence Quantification Analysis Entropy (RQAEn). All signals were examined at varying sampling frequencies and with varying amounts of added noise. Additionally, an increment time series of the original CoP data was examined to remove long-range correlations. Of the three measures examined, ApEn was the least robust to sampling frequency and noise manipulations. Additionally, increased noise led to an increase in SampEn, but a decrease in RQAEn. Thus, noise can yield inconsistent results between the various entropy measures. Finally, the differences between the entropy measures were minimized in the increment CoP data, suggesting that long-range correlations should be removed from CoP data prior to calculating entropy. CONCLUSIONS: The various algorithms typically used to quantify the complexity (entropy) of CoP may yield very different results, particularly when sampling frequency and noise are different. The results of this study are discussed within the context of the neural noise and loss of complexity hypotheses. Public Library of Science 2011-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3060087/ /pubmed/21437281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017696 Text en Rhea et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rhea, Christopher K.
Silver, Tobin A.
Hong, S. Lee
Ryu, Joong Hyun
Studenka, Breanna E.
Hughes, Charmayne M. L.
Haddad, Jeffrey M.
Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy
title Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy
title_full Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy
title_fullStr Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy
title_full_unstemmed Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy
title_short Noise and Complexity in Human Postural Control: Interpreting the Different Estimations of Entropy
title_sort noise and complexity in human postural control: interpreting the different estimations of entropy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017696
work_keys_str_mv AT rheachristopherk noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy
AT silvertobina noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy
AT hongslee noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy
AT ryujoonghyun noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy
AT studenkabreannae noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy
AT hughescharmayneml noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy
AT haddadjeffreym noiseandcomplexityinhumanposturalcontrolinterpretingthedifferentestimationsofentropy